[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 49 KB, 728x421, images(11).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922065 No.10922065 [Reply] [Original]

Would it be like this?

Riemann Hypothesis: Complex Analysis and Number Theory

P=NP: Algebraic Complexity

Navier-Stokes Equation: Fluid Mechanics

Yang-Mills and Mass Gap: Quantum Mechanics

Hodge Conjecture: Algebraic Topology

Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture: Elliptic Curves

I'm gonna prove them all.

>> No.10922076

>>10922065
good luck

>> No.10922078

>>10922076
Thanks, but I don't need it, I just need to study but I also need guidance on what to study so I don't waste time, that why I created this thread.

>> No.10922081

>>10922078
It's a waste of time. The only reason why you would do that in the first place is because you already get paid.

>> No.10922082

>>10922078
Why don't you need luck? Are you a once-in-an-era genius?
I'm pretty close to the Hodge conjecture and the navier-stokes equation, so don't bother with those.

>> No.10922087

>>10922082
Luck is for the unprepared. Those who dedicate their lives to the study of a subject and abandon all love, passions, desires and earthly pleasures don't need luck.

I'm not a genius, I wanna prove to the world that you don't need to be a genius in order to be the best, all you need is hard work.

>>10922081
I don't give a fuck about money, I'm doing it so I can prove myself to be the greatest mathematician alive.

>> No.10922089

>>10922087
This reads like you're 17.

>> No.10922096

>>10922089
I'm 23, half-way through my pure math degree. I thought I would get help here since this place was created for the socially akward, but you people are just like the professor and colleagues in my uni, laughing and ridicularizing me, but that's ok cause I'm gona prove all of you wrong, it may take long, but I will.

>> No.10922101

>>10922065
Just learn category theory and solve these problems at once bro

>> No.10922102

>>10922087


Look I wish you all the best but reality doesn't work like this. Do you know the amount of times brainlets say "oh if I just put the work in I would have gotten the same grades/been able to do that too" when in fact the smarter of society didn't put any work in to get those grades in the first place.

Then you have the likes of Dirac and more who are on the level of genius I am not sure you understand and they also have the obsession with mathematics and the non-stop hard work ethic who still don't solve these problems (though they have come up with incredible theory and more).

>> No.10922322

>>10922087
you sound like a fucking idiot. but so did i when i was like you.

prepare to be wrong for the rest of your life. and even if you're right, someone's already done it +100 years ago

>> No.10922327

>>10922102
I'm nothing like those people, I don't talk, I act, and I'll prove to all naysayers that I can do it even though I'm not a genius. I respect your opinion and advice but I'm set on that path, I'm gonna do it.

>> No.10922330

>>10922327
...do what? You don't even know.

>> No.10922334

>>10922322
No, the difference between us is that you gave up midway, it's 50% effort and 50% willpower, you lacked the latter probably.

And about your other argument, show me an average person who did things only a "genius" would do. Even if there is such a person, I believe each generation needs their own heros and I'll be the hero of the averages of this generation who don't believe in themselves, I'll show them anyone can do whatever they're set upon.

>> No.10922336

>>10922330
Prove the Millenium Problems.

>> No.10922337

>>10922327
Not the guy you're replying to but I'd be careful if I were you. I had much less lofty goals and thought I'd achieve them (I thought I'd build muscle) and years after trying my best I look the same, so before you even think about proving those, get a degree at a top school and see how you fare first for a reality check

>> No.10922361

>>10922330


don't be a prick. there are a lot of intelligent people out there who could do very well if they applied themselves. why quash a persons motivation?

>> No.10922382
File: 38 KB, 600x600, puffin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922382

>>10922065
Algebraic complexity is, at its core, philosophical simplicity.

>> No.10922385

>>10922337
>this was all an elaborate 'I can't build muscle' shit post

If I ever see you on the street, I am beating the shit out of you.

>> No.10922390

>>10922385
This is not fair.

>> No.10922399
File: 341 KB, 220x220, REPE.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922399

>>10922390
Why no-
...
FUCK
STOP
STOP BULLYING ME WITH YOUR BRAIN
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.10922403
File: 31 KB, 660x574, Pepe0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922403

>>10922399
Hey...

>> No.10922405

>>10922065
God speed anon I'm looking forward to the proofs

>> No.10922407
File: 7 KB, 259x194, Pepe1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922407

>>10922403
Hey!

>> No.10922410
File: 1.16 MB, 200x200, Pepe3.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922410

>>10922399
At least you can build muscle.

>> No.10922412
File: 80 KB, 1280x720, *internalree*.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10922412

>>10922410
I hate you so much...

>> No.10922749

Well if you were capable of solving this shit you would already have known the needed material.
With that attitude, you're proving that you're a retard brainlet and won't accomplish anything.

>> No.10922760

>>10922065
for P=NP and the riemann hypothesis u could also read into geometric complexity theory. there were some seminars talking about them too iirc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi2T_UH0bK8

>> No.10922791

>>10922065
Fluid mechanics, which is a branch of engineering, is definitely not the correct path to go down if you want to prove existence and uniqueness.
You would be better off going into PDEs and analysis.

The thing is OP, if and when these problems are solved they will almost certainly pull together techniques from parts of mathematics that curently seem disparate.

>> No.10922858

>>10922087
hahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahaha
*breathes in*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAHAH

>> No.10923042

>>10922101
Based this guy knows what he's talking about

>> No.10923117

>>10922065
>Best mathematician alive
What does that even mean? How can you be the best at something when it constantly evolves? Was Euler a better mathematician then Andrew Wiles? You can't evaluate that because mathematics is developing more and more. Wiles proved a very difficult problem while Euler set foundations for a lot of shit.

>> No.10923238

>>10922065
If we knew the domains needed to solve these problems, then they would have been solved by now.
You might be able to understand the statements if you study all these things though

>> No.10923416

>>10923117
he said alive which supposes a time period and thus a restriction in the change...

>> No.10923526

>>10923416
Still what does greatest alive mean? The best at proving difficult problems? The best at formulating conjectures? The best at innovating a field? You certainly can't do all of these unless you are methusulah (don't know how to spell his name) himself

>> No.10923534

If you have to ask this question on 4chan your IQ is too low to solve the millennium problems.

>> No.10923539

>>10922096
>ridicularizing
OP I don't know how to say this but you're... retarded.

>> No.10923542

>>10922065
what is she writing about

>> No.10923575

>>10922334
Oh, to be young and foolish...

Wait, you're 23?
You have 2 years before your brain is declining mathematically.

Oh, to be ... Foolish

>> No.10923596

Riemann's hypothesis has already been solved.

>> No.10923686

>>10923596
source?

>> No.10923908

>>10923575
>You have 2 years before your brain is declining mathematically.
That's false lad, might have been true several decades ago, but nowadays mathematicians peak in their thirties and start declining in their forties, it takes several years to even learn about some field in a deep level these days, Perelman himself only proved the Poincaré Conjecture in his thrities.

>> No.10923965

OPis based as fuck.

>> No.10923966

>>10923908
he's talking about fluid intelligence but the decline is decades long and probably wouldn't be noticeable until early 30's for an intelligent person, they tend to be more robust to cognitive declines than the rest of the population. more important is the ability to learn quickly and the creativity seen in younger people that is lost very soon after college rather than raw processing speed.

>> No.10924599

RH -> Complex Functional Analysis
P=NP -> A new field of logic
Navier-Stokes -> Complex Functional Stochastic Differential Equations
Yang-Mills -> A new field of physics
Hodge Conj. -> it's false, invent a counterexample
BSD Conj. -> Category Theory and Algebraic topology

>> No.10925177

>>10922065
Good luck OP

>> No.10925359

>>10922065
Shit thread but thanks for the cute image. I'm surprised that it's unedited.
I really like how it looks much more authentic than most "lol copypaste passages from a math textbook" drawings. I don't mean the content, but rather the style: aside from a few too-specific remarks (e.g. [0,1] (in R) looks really awkward), it looks like someone really is explaining some ideas to someone else on a whiteboard (off-the-cuff drawings, after-the-fact remarks to clarify questions that the other party had, etc.).

>> No.10925372
File: 109 KB, 850x449, firekeeper__.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10925372

>>10922065
If you're so dead on confident who needs no 50% luck , 5 % pleasure and 50%pain....
WHY
THE
FUCK
wasting time solving meme problems ?! Just so u can be called Le greatest Mathematician alive.
I suggest to you mr. wannabe GeNiuS to start solving whats CONSCIOUSNESS is instead!

>> No.10926091

>>10922096
nice post massulo

>> No.10926280

>>10922065
these problems are not going to be solved just by putting one's mind to it, they are going to be solved by someone who is very proficient in several different and very specific areas of mathematics and notices that these areas can be combined in a very specific way to attack the problem. you could be a walking encyclopedia of PDEs (which is just impossible to achieve in a single lifetime) and 90% you would still need to use tools from elsewhere to solve Navier-Stokes. but the thing is that nobody knows which tools until it's done. and since there is an upper bound on how much math one can absorb, literally the only thing you can do is just pick something, get good at it, and hope for the best.

you will not solve the millenium problems not because of lack of hard work or talent, but because you will not be lucky enough.

>> No.10926379

>>10922087
lol.
if you're young, you're naive.
if you're older than 20, you're just plain stupid.

>> No.10926388

>>10926379
>>10922096
nevermind, you're 23. plain stupid it is.

>> No.10926421
File: 55 KB, 500x325, 1558751676827.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10926421

>>10922065
Why do you want to solve problems Old Men couldn't resolve?

The problem isn't the mathematics, it is the story you distribute to the pundits/audience. Beyond the reference of self, there is nothing else in story.

I am KumKum, Story Man of the Rainbow Hive: Aboriginal Elder of his youngest, and one heck of a guy!

>> No.10926429

>>10922087
fuck off tooker

>> No.10926435
File: 116 KB, 500x520, 1535793653800.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10926435

>>10922087
So, you care about being the person everyone who doesn't understand yet utilizes your discovery goes to when they need their hand held? What is it with white people and needing to be the baby sitter of intellect for groups of stupid people?

>WISH GRANTED, MATHEMATICAL CURSE PLANTED! RECURSION PERVERSION IRRELEVANCE DISPERSION!

>> No.10926438
File: 23 KB, 400x267, 1543579865571.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10926438

>>10926429
Tooker is ma boi!

>He lives in EVERY neighborhood, because he's homeless. Get it?

>> No.10926599
File: 355 KB, 599x291, hags_kek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10926599

>>10922065
>>10922078
>>10922087
>>10924599

>> No.10927165

>>10922065
Riemann Hypothesis
> already proved by Sir Michael Atiyah

>> No.10927172

>>10922065
Before trying to study subjects to solve problems, you should study yourself to solve your own problems.
O
\No= =oM/
/ \
= |X__/

>> No.10927181

>>10922065
You can do it OP. But, there isn't a fast track to study up on any of these problems. You will probably need to invent new mathematics to solve big classes of problems which will include some of these problems. Some other anions mentioned category theory, that's probably your best shot.

>> No.10927188

>>10923534
>implying Grigori Perelman does not post daily on /sci

>> No.10927492

>>10922065
fuck these doubters, good luck

>> No.10927521

>>10922065
Hey OP, when you become famous, what sign will you give to indicate that you made this thread?

>> No.10927527

What does one need to know to even understand the Hodge Conjecture?

>> No.10927760

>>10922096
I am on your boat. Don't listen to weaklings. Glad to know some people have desires.

>> No.10927765

>>10922065
point is we don't know

>> No.10928483

>>10922065
Just follow the wiki in order and you'll be fine, its as simple as that

>> No.10928994

Laugh all you want, I already heard worse from my colleagues and professors, I even had an ugly fight with my own father because of my dreams, all your jesting is nothing to me, I'm set on achieving my dreams.

>>10927181
>>10927492
>>10927760
Thanks lads, glad to have some motivations.

>>10927521
I'll refuse the money for the solutions, just like Perelman.

>> No.10928997

>>10922065
I can't say much to the other things but I'm doing research in the field of fluid mechanics.
It might be interesting to look into transient relativistic dissipative fluid mechanics since the navier stokes equations are a rather brutal approximation to kinetic theory.

>> No.10929019

>>10922096
Life is not an anime. Usually, if someone is an underdog, then there is a good reason for that and they probably won’t make it. If everyone who spent their life on a problem solved it, all of these problems would be solved already.
You should save yourself some valuable time and work on something that you can understand.

>> No.10929412

>>10922065
>Fluid Mechanics
>Quantum Mechanics
Would studying physics help you prove mathematical theories?

>> No.10929426

>>10922337
go read Scrawny to Brawny.

>> No.10929428

>>10922089
Don't listen to this guy. I find your optimism in the face of likely failure inspiring. Study hard. Maybe you'll actually do it.

>> No.10929550

>>10927165
no mister, it was sir jonathon tooker that proved it

>> No.10929676

>>10929412
Depends on the math, but in many cases, yes

>> No.10929834

>>10922087
which anime is this from?

>> No.10930275

more important
what are you going to do after that?

>> No.10930625

>>10922065
>Hodge Conjecture: Algebraic Topology
Algebraic geometry.

>> No.10930810

>>10930275
Set a new precedent for future generations to rely upon when they think they can't make it because they aren't geniuses, they'll look behind and see me, an ordinary man who proved the Millenium Problems. I have no other desires in life.

>> No.10930815
File: 394 KB, 1360x2048, EF97701E-B200-47C0-9417-64F9C0F5A0D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10930815

>>10929834
Its pretty cute desu I hope they accomplish even some of their goals as would I assume any person with a good conscience.
>>10930810