[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 7 KB, 410x231, pregnancy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10904217 No.10904217 [Reply] [Original]

There's this notion today that the ungodly amount of radiation were exposed to today is "harmless"

When having to go trough stuff like airport scanner they say thing like "it's less than an x-ray".

but pregnant women can't have x-rays so it has SOME effects.

1)Doesnt the fact that its forbidden for pregnant mean that all radiation sources in the world should be forbidden. Even if the risk increase is 0.00000000000001%, why would i support it for something that doesnt benefit me. In the case of an x-ray a doctor can determine if its worth it and you can decide, but if you live near a power plant you get the rads like it or not. How is this fair?

2)Wouldn't it make sense to have pregnant women locked away in basements in faraday cages in the middel of the country so that rad exposure to their sensible babies is minimal?

>> No.10904263

>>10904217
The solution is to grow babies in vats of baby juice in a lab somewhere instead of the hacky inefficient solution of growing them inside the body of another human whose health habits are probably not the greatest and who will probably be working at a job for most of the pregnancy due to the push for women in the workplace

>> No.10904269

She's absolutely glowing