[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 660x574, _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588717 No.10588717[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What's the evolutionary advantage of being a spic?

>> No.10588721

Epic burrito farts

>> No.10588725
File: 112 KB, 612x612, IMG_254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588725

>>10588717
l lifted my hardest for 4 fucking years, gave it my all. Blood, sweat, and tears. All for her. And then she chooses a spic instead of me (a tall Aryan male who is attractive). This makes no sense. White women will doom the West. They will be our fucking genocide.

>> No.10588728

>>10588717
bilingual to serve more mutts, brown enough for gibbs and grants but white enough to make use of them

>> No.10588730

>>10588728
This. Basically the best of all worlds

>> No.10588731

>>10588725
maybe you've just got a small, weird-looking dick

>> No.10588784

>>10588725
Personality is a main factor in relationships

>> No.10588813

>>10588725
Spic here i creep women out, its up to your personality im a self hating spic that hates everything about spics and spic countries, that personality comes out heavy with women and creeps them out, embrace the spic culture become one of them that's what chicks like nowdays

>> No.10588833

>>10588784
Yep many incels don't get it. They genuinely believe the advice from other social inepts from 4chan and other places.

The most important factor deciding the success of a relationship is the matching personalities. That's all there is to it.

>> No.10588872
File: 121 KB, 1000x696, blackpill+101+looks+personality+okcupid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588872

>>10588833
"Personality"

>> No.10588874

>>10588784
lmao

>> No.10588885

>>10588872
Using dumb internet dating websites that have a completely different dynamic than real life "play".

I hate it when incels do this. Of course over the internet your appearance is the determining factor since online communication lacks the personality aspect that occurs when you meet someone IRL.

Also please realize 99% of people never even touch a dating service. I personally have never used such a thing and I know no women that ever used such a thing. Hell most of my female friends even make fun of women using it as being losers.

>> No.10588894
File: 37 KB, 600x450, bagdad-bob.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588894

>>10588885
>I personally have never used such a thing and I know no women that ever used such a thing.
The COPE is strong with this one.

>> No.10588916
File: 178 KB, 975x650, Tinder-most-popular-dating-app-for-millennials.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588916

>>10588885
75% of people aged 18 to 24 use Tinder

>> No.10588937

>>10588894
>bagdad-bob
Okay you earned my respect by posting that, but it's not a cope it's a genuine observation as a relatively social person with lots of female friends
>>10588916
I fall within the 25-34 age group, I'm also European and genuinely only hang out with the more educated people so maybe It's different in the US but I doubt it.

Tinder is a desperate last-option kind of thing to use when you have no other choice. At least that's how it's viewed by my female friends. They gossip about loser girls using it and it's pretty frowned upon.

Honestly instead of sitting inside all day and conjuring up all kinds of hypotheses about the female mind and behavior. How about you actually go outside for once and try to find out yourself. You'd be surprised and maybe you will finally cure yourself of your virginity.

>> No.10588948

>>10588937
>I fall within the 25-34 age group
Ok, then 45% of people in that age group use Tinder.
>Honestly instead of sitting inside all day and conjuring up all kinds of hypotheses about the female mind and behavior. How about you actually go outside for once and try to find out yourself. You'd be surprised and maybe you will finally cure yourself of your virginity.
You probably think it's your personality or intelligence that's attracting those females, but it's actually just because you're attractive. You are unironically giving the "be yourself" advice. These hypotheses about female behaviour are well supported.

>> No.10588964

>>10588937
>Honestly instead of sitting inside all day and conjuring up all kinds of hypotheses about the female mind and behavior. How about you actually go outside for once and try to find out yourself. You'd be surprised and maybe you will finally cure yourself of your virginity.

What awful advice. Well people will grow up eventually after years and years pass.

>> No.10588995

>>10588937

You are unironically prettier than you think and/or live in an area where there are only mostly pretty white people.
If you live in areas with many coexisting ethnicities or if you are not a typically attractive person and have to "work for it" you quickly notice these patterns. It's painfully obvious to anyone that lives through it, but completely unbelievable to those who don't. I understand why you think it's just excuses.
It's sort of along the lines of white people saying white privilege doesn't exist, or stuff like this. "Just work more, non-white person, you'll achieve all the same as me! It's all about your personality!"

>> No.10588997

>>10588725
You're probably a major douchebag.

>> No.10589023

>>10588916
That doesn't mean 75% of people in that age group use Tinder. It's telling you that 75% of people who use dating apps use Tinder. Big difference.

>> No.10589027

>>10589023
That explains a lot. Almost no one uses tinder.

>> No.10589033

>>10589023
>>10589027
No it doesn't, retards. I know where that chart is from and that wouldn't make any sense based on the distribution. It that were the case, a majority of people aged 45+ are using apps not on the chart (why didn't they include those apps on the chart?)

>> No.10589041

>>10589033
You've not understood it. The older generation tend to use dating websites rather than apps which is why they aren't mentioned.

>> No.10589042

>>10588916
Read the title OP

Its a chart of what the age demographics are of each dating app.

>> No.10589049

>>10589041
>That doesn't mean 75% of people in that age group use Tinder. It's telling you that 75% of people who use dating apps use Tinder. Big difference.
So according to you, those percentages are only out of people in that age range and use dating apps.
>You've not understood it. The older generation tend to use dating websites rather than apps which is why they aren't mentioned.
Which means a large majority of those older generations are using dating apps not on the chart (why would they not put those apps on the chart?).

>> No.10589051

>>10589042
This is even more wrong than what the other guy thinks. It literally cannot be the age demographics of each dating app because if you add up the percentages for Tinder, it adds up to more than 100%.

>> No.10589058

>>10589051
Why would they add up to 100%?! Doing so makes sense. All it says is how many people in that age group using a dating app use Tinder.

>>10589049
By your logic 1 in 4 people 65 years or older are using Tinder or Bumble. That's a lot of grannies bed hopping.

>> No.10589059

>>10589041
>>10589042
Here's another survey confirming that the 75% figure is out of all people aged 18-24, not just those that use dating apps: https://lendedu.com/blog/tinder-match-millennials/
>For reference, 72 percent of millennial college students said they have used the location based app.

>> No.10589068

>>10589058
>All it says is how many people in that age group using a dating app use Tinder.
I misinterpreted what you said in >>10589042. So you're just saying the same thing as the other guy. And no, it's not how many people out of that age group using a dating app use Tinder, it's how many people out of that age group use Tinder. That chart is just ambiguously worded.
>By your logic 1 in 4 people 65 years or older are using Tinder or Bumble. That's a lot of grannies bed hopping.
Nope, at most 1 in 4 people 65 years or older are using Tinder or Bumble (which is the case when the set of people aged 65 years or older using Tinder and the set of people aged 65 years or older using Bumble are disjoint). It could be the case that only 14% of people 65 years or older use Tinder or Bumble (the case when the 2 sets have heavy overlap).

>> No.10589069

>>10589059
I'm sure that figure is correct. 72% of people in that demographic and location have at one time used Tinder. Seems reasonable. That doesn't mean they've kept using it or the same figure can be generalised to the whole population at large. You really think 72% of younger farmers for example or those in small towns or other low population density areas are using it?

>> No.10589073

>>10589068
> 2 sets have heavy overlap
Agreed that could be true and sets the lower bound. However that would still be 1 in 8 over 65's using an app for some lemon party action. Nah.

>> No.10589076

>>10589073
>Nah.
Why not? And what app do you think the 7/8 people aged 65+ using dating apps use?

>> No.10589093

>>10589076
The company that owns Match.com, OkCupid and Tinder has many more users on its websites than it's apps. Tinders own numbers say it has 10 million daily users and 4 million subscribers. That's a tiny fraction of the available dating population.

>> No.10589106

>>10589093
Those 7/8 people aged 65+ using dating apps must use dating apps, not just exclusively websites. Because otherwise, that chart would say 100% of people aged 65+ using dating apps use Tinder or Bumble. But it does not, so according to you that large majority of people aged 65+ using dating apps but not Tinder or Bumble are still using some other dating app.

>> No.10589120

>>10588916
>85% of people aged 18-24 use Tinder
This is complete bullshit and marketing by Tinder. Not even 80% of people aged 18-24 use social media. So are they telling me there are more people using Tinder than social media in that demographic? What a bunch of bullshit.

>> No.10589815

>>10589120
>Not even 80% of people aged 18-24 use social media.
A simple Google search suggests otherwise

>> No.10589895

>>10588725
>>10588997
This. You seem like a judgemental asshole.

>> No.10589908

>>10589120
>>10588916
Kek.
I hope you don't work in anything that requires you to get near statistics.
>>10588885
This. Sampling bias is a real thing. There is a huge population of women who are serial monogamous or waiting for a good husband. None of these people get on, or stay on dating websites. In fact, I would imagine the number of men and number of women who are like this is at least somewhat proportional, since we know many men want to fuck around these days as well.

>> No.10589939
File: 327 KB, 959x999, 7aW6GgD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10589939

>>10589908
>There is a huge population of women who are serial monogamous
Most women have fucked at least 2 guys, especially the younger generation. They only become monogamous after they're past their prime and.
>we know many men want to fuck around these days as well.
That doesn't mean they get to. Male celibacy rate is rising, while female celibacy rate is dropping. Women are becoming less monogamous.

>> No.10589962

>>10588725
you don't look Aryan or tall in that pic
more like a brown mutt

>> No.10590186

>>10588725
First of all, she's average at best. Second of all, you must be either a sperg or a complete idiot who fell for the "women like bad boys" meme.

>> No.10590499

>>10589962
That's the fucking spic

>> No.10590521

>>10589939
>Literally 0% of women 22-35 are virgins

Don't be a retard who repeats anything a twitter incel posts

>> No.10590527

>>10588717
high birth rate

>> No.10592036

>>10588833
>>10588885
Have sex.

>> No.10592042

>>10588721
Thanks for the 21.
>>10588784
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Thanks for the 4.
>>10588813
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
>>10588874
Thanks for the 4.
>>10588894
Thanks for the 4.
>>10588964
Thanks for the 4.
>>10588997
Thanks for the 97.
>>10589058
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
>>10590521
Thanks for the 21.

>> No.10592046
File: 275 KB, 720x540, mayan-spaceship-palenque-mexico-the-lid-of-pakals-tomb-showing-him-flying-a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10592046

>>10588813
Nothing more disgusting to me than someone who hates their own race and culture. I'm white btw

>> No.10592049

>>10592042
Thanks for the 10592042.

>> No.10592054

>>10592042
Where is this shit meme from?

>> No.10592062

>>10592054
Thanks for the 4.

>> No.10592065

>>10592042
What's a timestamp 4?

>> No.10592068

>>10592065
When the last digit of the time of your post (the seconds) ends in 4.

>> No.10592080

>>10592042
The number is 420 not 421 you absolute mongol