[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 3 KB, 170x297, 987F38CC-3B41-4E91-8A69-8ACB1ECC6A4A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10505730 No.10505730 [Reply] [Original]

Let me start by saying that I don’t really believe in God but I did some math that threw me for a loop.

https://www.businessinsider.com/all-people-blue-eyes-have-common-ancestor-2017-9?utm_content=buffer509d2&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-bi

According to this article, and a lot of other scientific articles upon more research, all blue eyed people have a common ancestor. That would mean that roughly 10% of the planet came from a common ancestor. That means that there are 90% of people with a different eye color that are unaccounted for. Going forward, if we can assume that about 10% of the population came from a single ancestor (meaning at the time that the ancestor was alive), approximately only 10 people could’ve existed, or at least somewhere within a few magnitudes. And the article states the ancestor might’ve lived 6000 years ago. Recently I realized that the Bible claims that creation happened in 4000 BC aka 6000 years ago. You have to wonder how the scientific estimate lines up weirdly within the scope of something that many religions claim is the beginning. Possibly there’s a hole in this somewhere but I don’t know where it is. Either way it was an interesting thing to come up with.

>> No.10505738

>>10505730
That's not really what "mathematically" or "proved" means.

> if we can assume that about 10% of the population came from a single ancestor (meaning at the time that the ancestor was alive), approximately only 10 people could’ve existed, or at least somewhere within a few magnitudes.

That's not a good assumption, especially for a trait like blue eyes.

>> No.10505746

So this is the power of blue eyed intellect

>> No.10505751

>>10505730
youve only proven a distinct lack of genetics knowledge

>> No.10505756

>>10505751
Could you elaborate just to enlighten I’m high as balls rn

>> No.10506302
File: 3.89 MB, 241x328, RKN35tB.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10506302

>>10505730
All that proves is that blue-eyed whites are the chosen people and true children of God, which we all knew anyway.

>> No.10506411

>>10505730
There are multiple genes involved in eye color, which makes it super hard to track. Without knowing your sourced in depth I am very sceptical about it.

What you may interest is mitochondrial DNA. As it is herited only from the mothers side (no mitochondrial DNA in the head capsule of the sperm) there can be made a lineage to a african female humanoid who lived about 200k years ago. She may be the common ancestor from all of us.

>> No.10506414

All people with penis have a common ancestor that had the first penis ever.

>> No.10508489

>>10505730
Common ancestor is not the only ancestor.