[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 8 KB, 231x218, 16011601.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10096997 No.10096997 [Reply] [Original]

>let R be a ring, not necessarily with identity

>> No.10097003

>>10096997

lewd

>> No.10097009
File: 173 KB, 446x335, dfrtyuhfyscftysdy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097009

>>10096997
Let A be a commutative ring with unity

>> No.10097068
File: 7 KB, 250x206, 1487194759108s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097068

>Find this limit
>you may NOT use l'hopital's rule

>> No.10097073

>>10096997
>unital associative ring
Just call it a ring like any sane person

>> No.10097080

>>10097068
prove lhopitals rule and then use it

>> No.10097098

>ring
>rng
>rig
>rung
mathematicians will defend this

>> No.10097116
File: 35 KB, 640x684, 827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097116

>let X be a spectral algebraic space which is quasi-compact, locally Noetherian, and of Krull dimension < n.

>> No.10097117

>>10096997
wat

>> No.10097124

>>10097080
>then use it
Then you're still using it, retard

>> No.10097132
File: 24 KB, 400x400, yWRigl6B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097132

>regardless of the name rational function, it is not a well defined function

>> No.10097323

>>10096997
Lie algebras are rings without identity.

>> No.10097327
File: 14 KB, 600x384, 8e5016334f37c81fcb5e1b4d26608b18_enough-angry-pepe-know-pepe-frog-meme-angry_600-384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097327

>Using part (a) or otherwise, prove the result
>you will not earn any points if you use part (a)

>> No.10097333

>let R be a commutative, unital ring

>> No.10097337

>>10096997

Brainlets argue over whether zero is a natural number.

Undergrads who are catching on, argue over whether a ring has unity.

>> No.10097339
File: 12 KB, 300x202, 13858632857272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097339

>let G be an abelian group

>> No.10097341

>>10097339
>Let G be a nontrivial abelian group

>> No.10097348
File: 11 KB, 251x242, 1410826043235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097348

>>10097339
>let G be an abelian group that is not necessarily finitely generated

>> No.10097376
File: 232 KB, 834x769, suicidalpepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097376

> Add these 2 integers

>> No.10097395
File: 32 KB, 680x583, 1424626194222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097395

>show that there are no simple groups of order 427

>> No.10097467

>>10097323
>associative lie algebra

>> No.10097707

>in the neigh- in the neigh- in the neigh- in the neigh-

>> No.10097747
File: 8 KB, 256x206, 1476855200378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097747

>Let X be a vector whose null space spans R4. Determine the span of the inverse.

>> No.10097801
File: 60 KB, 600x849, 1509876828442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097801

>>10096997
>show that there is only one neutral element in a group

>> No.10097808

>>10097801
That's going in my doomer folder

>> No.10097848
File: 42 KB, 499x499, gUkApuk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097848

>let N be a neighbourhood of x (in the sense of Bourbaki, that is, a set containing an open set containing x)

>> No.10097878

>>10097098
>he still calls a cring a "commutative ring with identity"

>> No.10097880

>>10097341
>let H be a nontrivial proper subgroup

>> No.10097908
File: 75 KB, 700x431, 2d5705b4c1ad4562.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097908

>let M be a commutative monoid with monus

>> No.10097924
File: 1.08 MB, 276x260, 1468808815650.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097924

Let A be a local Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension d, and let M be a maximal Cohen-Macaulay module of finite injective dimension

>> No.10097960
File: 150 KB, 1200x800, a_man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10097960

>prove the existence of a real function f with f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) that's not of the form f(x)=c*x without using the axiom of choice

>> No.10098546 [DELETED] 

>>10097960
Tx=x on rationals and 0 everywhere else.

>> No.10098548

>derive Simpson's rule

FUCK

>> No.10099061
File: 39 KB, 420x420, tumblr_noxu6iudy41uwa0t9o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099061

>prove the axiom of choice

>> No.10099077 [DELETED] 
File: 18 KB, 253x229, comfy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099077

>>10099061
>Let X1, X2, .... , Xn be iid absolutely continuous random variables

>> No.10099090

>let 5 = 10

>> No.10100817

>let this post be a post that does not bump the thread