[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 26 KB, 478x483, 1458433232266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9822303 No.9822303 [Reply] [Original]

Why do women select for traits that aren't actually good for the development of the human race? Why do they select for violent barbarians?
People are getting cucked right now because the intellectual/hardworking society building beta male who takes care of kids isn't usually the father these days.
The good genes are disappearing because the impulsive short-term thinking bastards are more attractive to women.
We are heading towards an idiocracy and it's all because of mostly women.
Autists are a blessing to human race but they won't reproduce because women are selecting for normies.

>> No.9822306

lol women still fuck chad over monkeys bro

>> No.9822317

>>9822306
Women choose to have fun with idiots before settling down with a hard-working man. Then she cheats on the side with idiots that have society destroying genes and so the kids don't inherit society maintaining genes. Eventually only society destroying genes will be left.

>> No.9823339

Don't worry, artificial wombs and genetic engineering will be reality by the end of this century. Our species will conquer the stars and inherit the universe.

>> No.9823344

>>9822303
>traits that aren't actually good for the development of the human race

This is a meaningless statement. Biologically, all an organism cares about is reproducing with another member of the species generally free of defects and diseases - nothing more. Women don't seek out geniuses to exclusively fuck because one, they don't care enough, and two, women are attracted to physically strong/socially outgoing men capable of protecting them and making their lives fun.

>Why do they select for violent barbarians?

The fuck are you talking about?

>People are getting cucked right now because the intellectual/hardworking society building beta male who takes care of kids isn't usually the father these days.

Yes, because most intellectual beta males are skinnyfat basedboys who couldn't win a fight if it was against a fucking housefly.

>The good genes are disappearing because the impulsive short-term thinking bastards are more attractive to women.

Women don't care about "genes" beyond basic levels of physical attractiveness and not being a total retard.

>Autists are a blessing to human race but they won't reproduce because women are selecting for normies.

Jesus Christ, man.

>> No.9823350

They don't select for violent barbarians. there are two things at play here:

1. You are not as smart as you think
2. Other people are not as dumb as you think

Successful people are almost exclusively chads and they are exclusively much sharper than you. Just because someone has bad hearing doesn't mean they have extraordinary eyesight.

The truth is that smart people don't fall into one personality type or social role, even if it is comforting to believe that you inherently have some advantage over chads (just because you don't succeed socially like they do)

>> No.9823356

>>9822303
>Why do women select for traits that aren't actually good for the development of the human race?
Because for the last 3 billion years or so, brawn is what mattered most. The biggest decider in whether you would survive to mate was how strong and fast you were. It's only the last few hundred thousand years that intellect has really become very important. For most of history, you only had to be smart enough to not get eaten. Being smart enough to build a society did not pay the calorie bills. Women have ~3 billion years worth of instinct telling them to fuck the strongest and fastest, but only a million or so telling them to fuck nerds. Less even because it's only the last 3000 or so years that you didn't also have to be physically fit to take advantage of that intelligence.

>> No.9823364
File: 8 KB, 312x268, fuck_off_brandon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823364

>>9823344
Fuck off Brandon.

>> No.9823377

>>9822303
They've always been attracted to fit and fun men, but intellect was favorized when there were advantages of a better life. Nowadays women have safety due to welfare, are self-suficient and there's just no difference in life standard whenever you fuck chad or brian

>> No.9823402

>>9823364
Now that's a comprehensive post

>> No.9823661

>>9823350
>Successful people are exclusively much sharper than you.
Let's be honest, there must be a lot of 115 IQ chads with amazing charisma, looks, and height, who are super successful in the business world despite not being intellectually impressive.

>> No.9823662

>>9822303
not sci

actually chads are better for the human race than sickly nerds

get fucked bitch

>> No.9823715

>>9823364
he's right though. it is quite plausible that intelligence within certain ranges hurts fitness.

>> No.9823737

>>9823661
the real problem you have is believing that iq matters for anything substantive. it's like black people insisting people hate their skin color and not their retarded behavior in society. perpetual victim, meanwhile successful people will always be positive beacons of social and physical stability, health and prosperity. and maladjusted weirdos will always pen their phamplets about utopias in which their rule as defacto gods through the instantiation of their ideas, a purer more moral and ethical type of dictator, one who sets the game in motion and pre-determines the rules and outcomes. there's lots of parables that deal with this type of person, eyes too big for your mouth, bit off more than you can chew etc.


when it comes down to it, you are shorter and uglier and fatter or skinnier than average. and a split second look at you is sufficient to tell what you can offer, both financially, sexually and intellectually. a strong, fit, confident person is someone you like and want to spend time around just because it opens doors to more people like that. a sad weak lonely person is someone you want to avoid, because you might catch their disease and become even more miserable.

be honest- did you have your pick of hundreds of people to be friends with and you selected your current group out of pure aesthetic and intellectual rigor, or were you stuck with dregs.

>> No.9823792

This thread is perhaps the least scientific, but most woke thread I've seen on /sci/ in quite some time.

>>9823737
>>9823350
>>9823344
>>(you)

>> No.9823794

>why do women like men who put all there focus in being preferred sexual partners by being fit and social?
>why do beta males just accept taking kids who aren't theirs instead making their own kids?
>why are the good genes so shit at making women wet?
>why is it all womens fault for preferring the fit and social?
>why are autists so shit at socializing with women so they can have kids?

>> No.9823796

>>9823794
Pretty much incel central.

>> No.9823808
File: 32 KB, 400x382, smug edward witten.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823808

>>9822303
Jewish women are the only people that select for intelligence
Jewish women crave for the Big brain Phenotype.
Jews praise genius intellect above brainlet muscles.

Because that Dumb Goyim is doomed to be Slaves.
Jews are destined to be Master Overlords.

While Female White Shiksas are being Blacked.
Jewish women know how to improve the gene pool
By selecting the Big Jewish Brain over the Big Black Cock


>>9822306 >>9823344 >>9823356
>>9823377 >>9823662 >>9823737

>> No.9823817

>>9823737
>and a split second look at you is sufficient to tell what you can offer
Heh, I think that's true.
I remember a few years ago I went out to a movie in my small town at night, and I was wearing a hoodie with the hood pulled up.
Some girls I was walking by were looking at me and saying something I couldn't discern, but then one of them caught a glimpse of my face, and said "oh, it's just a nerd," and her friends giggled.
Just a look at my face was enough to tell them what kind of person I was, and they probably could have correctly guessed that I was a computer geek or that I was interested in math, and also that I'm unassertive and shy.

>> No.9823831
File: 26 KB, 554x524, high IQ virgins.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823831

>>9822303

>>9818367
>Why are high IQ people more likely to be virgins?

>>9818377
>disdain for plebs

>> No.9823845

>>9822303
Why do men select for traits that aren't actually good for the development of the human race? Why do they select for violent harpies?

>> No.9823852

>>9823845
Beggers can't be choosers. Beta males can't choose because no woman likes them.

>> No.9823853
File: 61 KB, 1161x651, 1529650670037.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823853

>>9822306 >>9823794
128 IQ or above is bad for leadership
>>9823835

http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/why-highly-intelligent-people-make-the-worst-leaders

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/being-too-intelligent-can-make-you-a-less-effective-leader/

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/most-intelligent-people-worse-leaders-study-university-lausanne-iq-a8055846.html

https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/11/13/very-intelligent-people-make-less-effective-leaders-according-to-their-peers-and-subordinates/

https://www.zmescience.com/science/psychology-science/smart-leaders-poor-leaders-0432432/

https://www.inc.com/marcel-schwantes/a-new-study-reveals-1-surprising-fact-about-leaders-with-high-iq.html

>> No.9823869

>>9822303
The people who actually aren't capable of giving a rat's ass about their great great great grandchildren are the ones who are breeding. Caring about that kind of thing is super negative and no fun at all.

It's called an evolutionary trap. Humans are already extinct.

>> No.9823872
File: 471 KB, 500x346, you best start believin in cringe compilations.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823872

>>9822303

>> No.9823880

>>9822303
Sounds like a bunch of INCEL bullshit to me. Go pay a hooker if you cant get yourself laid.

>> No.9823884

>>9823808
Some jewish chicks are very pretty - and I'm not talking about the ones that look like your typical white thot - ones you could tell were definitely jews.

>> No.9823887

>>9823344
Fuck off, Brandon.

Mangy, rabid git. You’re 20 years old, you don’t get to have an opinion on the way society works. If you fool yourself into thinking that’s not true, then go back to

>>>/pol/

>> No.9823892

>>9822303
im pretty smart and a lot of intelligent cute girls want my dick because im also fun, fit and handsome
maybe like on top of being smart stop being ugly, fat and boring

>> No.9823899

>>9822303
Because ooga booga you are not a civilized ape you are supposed to be an ape that hunts animals stupid fuck. Women are still sexually programmed in the stone age and nothing we do will evolve their reproductive programming, might as well exterminate them.

>> No.9823900

>>9823808
I'm sure jews have their fair share of chad/stacy retardedness as well as this:
>>9823869
going on as well. Every race does. It does seem like whites are by far the worst off though.

>> No.9823920

>>9823892
Your post reeks of larp.

>> No.9823928

>>9823817
the way you tend your memes the pretty girl tends to understanding men at a glance. she knows you were not ready yet, an unripe fruit, but maybe in 15-20 years, she can return and you with your fortune 500 startup and her with her tight yoga bod can make a great team for expanding her shoe collection.

>> No.9823936

>>9823928
>but maybe in 15-20 years

he'll be bitter af

>> No.9823947

>>9823928
>a great team for expanding her shoe collection

if this is all she's interested in then she should definitely go with the chad. problem is people who get shit done resent the chad/stacy team and therefore will not sacrifice their own ego to enlarge that of the chad/stacy duo.

>> No.9823955

>>9823947
but the peaches modern vaginoplasties can create my friend. so smooth. so peachy. you cannot resist.

>> No.9823960

>>9823955
>so peachy
i cannot resist.

>> No.9823964

>>9823955
>vaginoplasties
good god. thanks for the nightmares btw.

>> No.9823995

>>9822303
>Why do they select for violent barbarians?
Because for the last few thousand years violent Barabarians were the correct choice.

>> No.9824795

>>9822303
>Why do they select for violent barbarians?
It's a trait of an alpha male, who will violently secure resources for the female and offspring.

>> No.9824833

>>9822303
>intellectual/hardworking society building beta male who takes care of kids isn't usually the father these days
lolwut, beta males didn't built shit. What do beta males do but shitpost on r9k?

WE WUZ ROMAN SCHOLARS N SHIET

nigger tier coping.

>> No.9824858

>>9824833
Beta bux pay the taxes, do the research and spend time with kids. Chads do hedonism.

>> No.9825103

Superior human beings are choosing 2D over 3D

>> No.9825154

>>9823364
who is that guy? i've only started seeing his posts the past couple days

>> No.9825162
File: 251 KB, 1280x1821, g1521745432758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9825162

>>9825103
this :3