[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 17 KB, 284x177, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5867452 No.5867452[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What is 1/3 in decimal ?

>> No.5867480

>>5867452
1,3

>> No.5867508

Its precise value cannot be presented in decimals, only an arbitarily good approximation. Decimals are inconvenient. Avoid them.

>> No.5867513

>>5867508
show me pi as a fraction.
everything is fucking inconvenient in math.

>> No.5867514

>>5867513
>show me pi as a fraction.

2pi/2

>> No.5867515

It's .25 in dozenal.

>> No.5867516

>>5867513
Show me pi in decimals. Not an approximation but the precise value. Do it.

>> No.5867518

SAGE GOES IN ALL FIELDS

>> No.5867519

>>5867516
Do you have some problem with irrational numbers?

>> No.5867959

>>5867519
Yes, they are not rational. I prefer rationality.

>> No.5867971 [DELETED] 

>>5867452

>> No.5868512

>>5867518
Sage is not a downvote.

>> No.5868599

>>5868512
Do you even know how 4chan works?
Fucking newfags everywhere... read the rules, dude

>> No.5868669

>>5867516
is this what you are looking for?

http://jqmgrdyk.home.xs4all.nl/pie/

>> No.5869145

It is 0.3334.

>> No.5869148

>>5869145
>lel, battle royale?

>> No.5869168

>>5867452
0.3.3

then 0.3.3'43234
0.3.3'24975
then 0.3.3'68101

and voila you have 1...1

>> No.5869621

4, dozenal master race

>> No.5869685

>>5867959
Ancient Greek philosopher detected.

>> No.5870633

>>5869148
Is this a movie reference?

>> No.5871409 [DELETED] 
File: 435 KB, 757x740, quantumcatlady.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5871409

>>5869148
It is a good thing I woke up early yesterday.

>> No.5873172

>>5869685
Rationalism was invented in the 17th century, not by the ancient greeks.

>> No.5873636

>>5873172
yeah they fucking knew better

>> No.5873761

>>5873636
Clearly not. For example they assumed the existence of magical souls.

>> No.5875345

>>5873761
Well that's an unjustified assumption.

>> No.5875366

>simple question
>over 20 replies without any real answer

It's 0.3...

>> No.5875368

>>5875366

LOL LOOK AT THIS FAG

>> No.5875552

>>5875366
>Not seeing a .999... topic incoming

>> No.5875683

>>5867514
I lold

>> No.5876206

>>5875366
It must not be simple for you, as you are wrong.

>> No.5876643
File: 93 KB, 533x700, 4057958+_27368e8b70e9ba47c38204c2e424ef0b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5876643

>>5875683

>> No.5876664

>>5876206
>as you are wrong.

Well, let's hear it then. This ought to be good.

>> No.5876685
File: 587 KB, 1920x1080, grimes inc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5876685

>>5876643
>autism intensifies

>> No.5877646

>>5876664
Do you understand how the decimals are constructed?

>> No.5878855

>>5869168
What the fuck is a number with TWO decimal points?

>> No.5880014

>>5867515
That's not how "dozenal" works.

>> No.5880017

.333333333333... (infinity of 3's)
proof :
.333333333333...=sum from n=1 to +infinity of 3/(10^n)=3/10*(sum from n=0 to+infinity of (1/10)^n=3/10*(1-lim n->+inf of (1/10)^n)/(1-1/10)=3/10*10/9=3/9=1/3
im a 200-iq genius

>> No.5880672

>>5880017
>im a 200-iq genius
Clearly not, if you honestly believe that nonsense is a "proof" despite the trivial errors it contains.

>> No.5881995

>>5880017
This is very hard to understand. Could you post it in jsmath?

>> No.5882731

>>5875552
This thread is about 0.3334. Please discuss that number somewhere else.

>> No.5882745

>>5875552
that number doesn't exist, show me a fraction that produces it, you can't because there isn't one

>> No.5883073

>>5882745
Not that guy, but I think;

99999.../999999....+1
should do the trick?

>> No.5883103

>>5882745
1/1

>> No.5883117
File: 3 KB, 182x224, mathdegreeinphysics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5883117

I'll take my trophy now pls

>> No.5884131

>>5883117
That's a fraction. OP asked for a decimal representation.

>> No.5884813

>>5884131
OP asked for a decimal. There is a decimal inside of that fraction.

>> No.5885380

...

>> No.5886284

>>5884813
Decimals are constructed to represent a number without fractions.

>> No.5886290

>>5886284
It simplifies to .3 anyway

>> No.5886297

>>5886284

A decimal is just a fraction of a power of ten.

>> No.5886300

>>5877646

Do you?

>> No.5886308

.333...

>> No.5887310

>>5886290
Please show me how.

>> No.5888680

>>5886297
No, that's not what a decimal is.

>> No.5888740

>>5867452
.1 in base 3.

>> No.5888743

>>5875366
I feel bad for your autism.

>> No.5889287
File: 49 KB, 1296x720, 5867452.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5889287

Someone has been keeping at least 35 threads alive
by bumping them twice a day. Compare the post times of
>>5867959 >>5869145 >>5870633 >>5873172 >>5875345 >>5876206
>>5877646 >>5878855 >>5880014 >>5880672 >>5881995 >>5882731
>>5884131 >>5884813 >>5886284 >>5887310 >>5888680
to the post times in other threads.
It's clear most of these are the same person.
The threads being bumped:
>>5858447 >>5861383 >>5862983 >>5863249 >>5865823 >>5866853
>>5867452 >>5867640 >>5868097 >>5868460 >>5868538 >>5869504
>>5869595 >>5869759 >>5869946 >>5872951 >>5873166 >>5873829
>>5874378 >>5874727 >>5875025 >>5876410 >>5876819 >>5878449
>>5878607 >>5878684 >>5878722 >>5880041 >>5880453 >>5880775
>>5881738 >>5883998 >>5884116 >>5884625 >>5885545
Write to moot@4chan.org if you want it to stop.

>> No.5889560

>>5886308
You should first read the thread and refrain from posting already debunked answers.

>> No.5890596

>>5888740
Why did you omit the 0? It should be 0.1

>> No.5891315

>>5885380
I have never seen three decimal points alone like that before. What does it mean?

>> No.5892988

>>5891315
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis

It's often used as a rhetorical device.

>> No.5893003 [DELETED] 

>>5892988
16 hour bump difference for idiocy

i love highschool kids

>> No.5893776

>>5892988
This is very helpful, thank you.

>> No.5893804

>>5873172
It was a reference to Pythagoras' absolute rejection of irrational numbers. Pythagoras, who also happens to be listed on the wikipedia page for rationalism along with several other ancient greek philosophers.

>> No.5894892

>>5893804
>Pythagoras' absolute rejection of irrational numbers

Why did he reject them?

>> No.5894895 [DELETED] 
File: 32 KB, 514x352, 1373506916291.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5894895

>>5894892
15 hour bump well i shiggery diggery doo

>> No.5894914

>>5889287
I suspect that this is going on for months now

>> No.5895746

>>5894895
Can you answer the question?

>> No.5895758

>>5881995
>>5880672
It's a simple infinite geometric sum you plebs.

>> No.5896964

>>5895758
It is not a geometric sum.

>> No.5897802

>>5894892
They are not rational.

>> No.5897924

>using decimal instead of p-adics
>...00031023

>> No.5899359

>>5897924
What is p?

>> No.5899831

>>5899359
It is the momentum.

>> No.5901033

>>5899831
How can it be measured?

>> No.5901858

>>5901033
By opening the momentum box.

>> No.5901885

>>5867513
C/2r

>> No.5903301

>>5901858
That sounds dangerous.