/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16135901
Democracy(two party system) was a mistake.
just put ai to make laws that seem most reasonable and let referendum people vote on it.
now everything is biometric and with a smartphone in their pocket should be doable and would be better for everyone.

>>16135901
I’m against nuclear power.
I met this greenpeace chick at my university and had her rattle on about how nukes are bad and then told her she was full of bs and that france was right to sink their boat. I think she cursed me, I haven’t talked to a single woman since then.

>>16135920
i believe it , life is like that sometimes.

>>16135922
You'll get your telescope.

>>16135922
Thinking about being completely open handed with you. As long as I find no reason not to it will happen. Gotta be careful. I'm worth lots of money as is.

they'll always use as much carbon fuel as the Earth supports, and when shit starts going bad, they'll inevitably switch to nuclear. it's not like this shit has anything to do with what average folk think of it lol, get real. this whole discussion is political theater, nothing more.
they'll use carbon as much as they can get away with, and then they'll forcefully switch to nuclear. hopefully clean fusion comes along in the meanwhile.

>>16135901
>>old people didn't care and got mad
i fucking hate these people so much

>>16135911
>two party system
3 or more parties don't help much. See : europe.

>>16135901
nuclear power is most support by:
>men
>republicans
>college educated,
>old people
>whites
it was mostly old people at the library because only old people engage in civic democracy outside of george floyd riots.

>>16136011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k12teOokSqM

Bring back an actual monarchy, I want to see politicians heads put on spikes.

>>16136068
the thing with power is you need an even more psycho to take power away from psychos. and then you have to deal with the even bigger psycho. you can't ever stop this game in human form. that's how humans roll

>>16136138
oh ok my mistake let's be powerless then, i love politicians

>>16136229
our only real power is slowly going away with AI replacing humans in various jobs.

>>16135901
CO2 isn't a pollutant and it isn't a toxic

>>16136949
Please breath nothing but CO2 and get back to me with how it goes. Do it.

>>16135901
>Nuclear power debate
>At a library
>On a Friday
>OP wonders why it's filled with old people
This seems like it should have been some Wednesday shit

>>16136955
You would die from asphyxiation. But that doesn't mean CO2 is toxic. Do you know what toxic means?

>>16135901
>poisoned by CO2
Nice try, retard.

>>16136949
>>16137288
>Toxic is an adjective that means containing or being poisonous material, especially when capable of causing death or serious debilitation. It can also mean extremely harsh, malicious, or harmful.
why do fish die if there's too much CO2 in an aquarium?

>>16137355
Why do humans die if you put them underwater?

>>16137355
>why do fish die if there's too much CO2 in an aquarium?
They asphyxiate. Excessively high CO2 levels in the water removes the concentration gradient that would normally exchange cause CO2 to flow out of the creature's gills.
It isn't that the CO2 damages the fish per se, but that the fish can't shed excess CO2 from its own blood and replace it with O2.

>>16135901
Old people are biased by 30+ years of anti-nuclear power propaganda from the fossil fuel industry and the useful idiots it funds through backchannels like Greenpeace. Everything I've ever heard in a debate with them over power always boils down to made up numbers and often overlaps with other conspiracies or complete nonsensical misunderstandings of physics.

>>16137366
>>16137374
>It isn't that the CO2 damages the fish per se,
retards

What causes the co2 oscillation across geological timespans?

>>16137476

>>16137446
He's right. There's a difference between dying of asphyxiation and dying via inhaling chlorine gas or something else that actively kills you.