/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16134502
He's just a moron that doesn't know how to raise chickens properly. Flock integration is an important skill that he doesn't have. Even when you integrate two flocks of the same breed the newcomers will be picked on if you immediately put the birds together, possibly resulting in injury or death, especially if the flocks are different ages. Flocks have to be acclimatize to each other gradually.

There is no such thing as "racism". It is a made up jewish word. There is only "realism" and in reality, the races of men are different from one another on a general basis.

>my group has to live
>any other group has to die
yep, as primitive as it gets

>>16134502
"Racism" properly defined, as "race realism," is rational and natural. But it even goes further than that, it's more tribal and ethnic, obviously.

Do animals adopt?, of course, and they kill outsiders, too. Can advanced animals like humans bring different people together? of course, at a societal cost.
The lie is there is a net benefit to forced integration.

>>16134550
Trvth

>>16134550
I should add, "animal domestication" is a form of forced integration AND segregation, depending on the case.

>>16134550
>The lie is there is a net benefit to forced integration.
longer term, and not for your happiness but for business, society is a business anon.
also inbred groups eventually wipe

>>16134560
Right, a net benefit for who/whom.
Which is why "tinfoil hatters" use the farm analogy for human control, because it's legit.

>>16134502
>Is racism a fundamental part of existence
Only for the people who classify themselves as white.
Racism is the only strategy found so far that can prevent white recessive genes from being bred out.

>>16134550
>"Racism" properly defined
>Gives a retarded definition

>it's more tribal and ethnic, obviously
It should be obvious with even a few minutes of serious thought that racism is the polar opposite of tribalism.

>>16134568
I am not disagreeing that we are being farmed.

>>16134560
>also inbred groups eventually wipe
>this is why you must marry a nigger
I'm sure a population of several million people has an inbreeding problem

>>16134502
>Is racism a fundamental part of existence for all animals? is it programmed into our DNA?
It's kind of hard for your genes to compete if they program for behaviours that favour entirely different genes.

>>16134572
Your the unserious one here:

In normal usage, calling someone a "Racist" is not some sort of neutral adjective, but an equivalent to "he is full of hatred and unclean."

Idk man. Kanye spends money out of pocket to help poor people. But people donate millions to charities that don't spend 50,000 to help. And people donate millions to artists who promote their acts for charity.

Taylor Swift should be president.. because she convinces people to donate money. Kanye should be avoided at all costs even though he pays out of pocket and doesn't ask for help.

no one should stomach a person who does things one their own. People need to praise those who can convince the majority waste their money. #FUCKKANYE#DEVOURTAYLOT

>>16134583
>Your the unserious one here:
No, my the serious one. Everyone else is basically repeating memes.

>In normal usage, calling someone a "Racist" is not some sort of neutral adjective, but an equivalent to "he is full of hatred and unclean."
Indeed, such is the deep confusion the white supremacists have sown, particular among the victims of racism, who mistakenly define racism as "hate", "ignorance", and other retarded fallacies.

>>16134592
Who cares, the memes are true, doesn't matter if they are "memes."

You're the one who brought up "white supremacists" like it's the devil and original sin.

>>16134592
"Race realism" is NOT the opposite to tribalism/nationalism, but degree, if you look into it.

individual>family>extendedfamily>tribe>nation>race

>>16134560
Inbreeding is only an issue for small, isolated communities (physically or socially) with cousin marriage over several generations. For the scale in which 99%+ of humanity lives, inbreeding is a non-issue because the population of each group is so large, the amount of incidental inbreeding is a minor rounding error.
But if there's an asteroid that wipes out all of humanity but a dozen people of diverse racial groups, in that contrived situation you might be right. For the reality of contemporary society however, it's not at issue.

>>16134602
>Inbreeding is only an issue for small,
it kind of is a spectrum tho. you get statistics for certain issues. the less it happens the more healthy the population, the less inbreeding related issues.
I also don't really care that much about it. in 2-3 generations we start merging with machines/artificial or synthetic bodies or something of that nature. and not "we" rather (them). "we" are on our way out in the grand scheme of things

>>16134502
>racism
Describe what you mean with more words. "Racism" is a toxic word used only by naive people or those who seek to delude and confuse people.

Research on 'implicit bias' belong on the psychology side of the humanities studies. Of course /his/ is to low functioning to have catched up on this topic.

Preference for one's own offspring, family and pack has been evolutionary beneficial.
In a human context: try to find the benefits of integrating with a dysfunctional culture and you might not need to think more about this question. Culture and genetics goes hand in hand.
While group genetics is a big numbers game and an overlap on the individual level exists it's just easier to go with what have been proved to work rather than to be an opposing force to biology and society.

>>16134620
Describe to me what you think the mode is of what I do?

>>16134622
Describe to me how that was your IQ and not mine. You are truly stupid

>>16134620
It's treated as synonymous with hatred, in any academic setting with consequence, like "evil" in Catholic Theology - an eternal problem..

>>16134620
"implicit bias" is pseudoscientific garbage

>>16134625
Your whole population will be hell'd any moment now and you're the idiot at the forefront of it making stupid statements.

>>16134550
cheesed to meet you

>>16134631
It's accurate, and I agree, it's stupid for a scientific mindset. Again I tried to word it carefully,

"academic setting with consequence."

What really happens is publishers either retract, or act dumb on the implications of their findings.

>>16134625
As an -ism I think of racism as political philosophy which in practice is seen in apartheid and war propaganda.
When populations' environmental and cultural selection pressures has made them different enough there's no responsibility for one culture to accommodate a dysfunctional one.

>>16134595
>the memes are true
No, they are not. Racism is not "hate", "integration", "segregation", or any of these other vague, meaningless meme terms being spammed in the thread.

>like it's the devil and original sin
But did I do that? Come on. I'd say to stop with the straw men, but of course your aim is to confuse and derail accurate thought with stupid bullshit, so instead I'll just say I respect the attempt.

>>16134601
In the moment that people decide to classify themselves based on skin color, tribalism and ethnicity has been set aside.
Perhaps "opposite" (in the geometric sense) was the wrong term, but it is simply a contradiction to describe racism as "tribal" or "ethnic".

Racism is a superior organizing principle. The people who classify themselves as white are the most capable people on the planet, and the white supremacists are the most capable white people.

>>16134654
I get it, I know, but in "normie use," it's just not that way, "racism" synonymous with "hatred."

It goes beyond race, IMO, I unironically tell people, "I'm not a racist, I'm a geneticist."

>>16134502
this thread belongs on /pol/, not here.

>I unironically tell people, "I'm not a racist, I'm a geneticist."
— Anonymous, >>16134657

>>16134660
>personal is political
>ok
>politics invades EVERY PART OF LIFE
>no, not like that!

>>16134643
>When populations' environmental and cultural selection pressures has made them different enough there's no responsibility for one culture to accommodate a dysfunctional one.
This is a distortion. Most dysfunction everywhere on the planet is the work of Europeans who intelligently set aside ethnicity and classified themselves as white, for the purpose of mistreating and subjugating all those not classified as white, for the purposes of genetic survival and self-enrichment.

Tribes and nations around the world engaged in infighting even in the face of invasion by Europeans. Not understanding what would happen to them once the fighting was over, for they are nonwhite, and threaten white genetic survival merely by existing.

The only nations on the planet that haven't had their ass kicked by white power are the ones white power didn't care about. And no, none of this implies they have any "responsibilities." That would be like saying a mugger has a responsibility to make sure his victim is okay. Childish at best, disingenuous at worst.

>>16134691
HOSPITAL, now

>>16134657
>it's just not that way, "racism" synonymous with "hatred."
There are people who love their dogs, and dress them up in clothes, feed them the finest food, and spend huge amounts of money supporting them. And yet they know that a dog is still a dog, and it is not hatred to think so.
If your slave lives and eats better than your dogs, and you don't hate your dogs, then you obviously don't hate your slave either.
Should we pretend to be retarded just because normies are saying dumb things?

If it helps, we can make up a new word for you. How about "racecode"? Meaning the system of behaviors of a group of people who set aside ethnicity and classify themselves as "white" on the basis of skin color.
One of the potential by-products of our new racecode concept might be hatred, especially in the low level racecoders with lesser IQs.
But the master racecoders of the 20th century don't work by hatred; they operate calmly, and according to logic.

>>16134709
Sure, if you can name a single country in existence today that does not answer to white power, then I will accept that I am delusional and will go seek psychiatric help.
If you can't, however, then consider that perhaps it is you in need of help.

>>16134625
Catholicism is evil fyi. Be a baptist

>>16134691
>for the purpose of mistreating and subjugating
This is a bit unfair. Of course in one sense it is true but only by a handful of Europeans, e the "capitalist class," whom did the same thing to other Europeans as well btw, consisting of plantation owners, aristocracy, conquistadors and the like. I am not even a commie cuck but "capitalist class" is an apt description, the "moneyed interests."

The vast majority of Europeans, ie settlers, have always been kind to the other races (starting schools, integration programs, missionaries etc). A lot kinder than any other conquering force they had ever known by a long shot. I would say the rest of your post is more or less correct however.

>>16134720
>posts a pic disproving his own premise
US working for Israel isnt an example of "white power," it is an example of white subservience to Jewish power.