/sci/ - Science & Math

No

>>14610414
according to one of the greatest string theorists of all time, it’s not only possible but a direct prediction of string theory

Joel Scherk, an hero

>>14610414
We don't know how gravity even works

>>14610414
nobody believes me when i tell them this, but comic books aren't real, neither are hollywood scifi movies.

>>14610414
>Is antigravity possible?
Sure. Just ditch the gravity theory, and then you don't have to worry about gravity anymore.

>>14610414

>>14610582
Here, I'll help your Bingo-board.

>>14610582
Does picrel still count for your Anti-Matter space?

>>14610593
would be more funny if you had ATLAS and CMS instead of two ATLASes

>>14610585
102% relative c huh

>>14610619
>102% relative c huh
Yeah, why not?
I think it's exponentially harder to go from 90-99%C than it is to go from 1-90%C.
I don't think it's unreasonable for celestial bodies to each be traveling at >50%C moving in opposite directions.

>>14610414
Doesn't the navy have an antigravity patent? Not saying it works or anything, just that a patent exists for it

>>14610414
Instead of distorting space inwards, distort it outwards. Maybe some sort of brief snapback from vanishing a mass.

Maybe you could have some electromagnetic oscillation device that spins super fast and produces an EM field where the higher energy waves are traveling from "top to the bottom" (blue waves), and the lower energy field is running the opposite to create a "gravity gradient".

Gravity is not real.

The earth is flat.

Its magnets all the way down boys.

>>14610701
>The earth is flat.
So the earth is just spinning around like a 2d merry-go-round? Or is that what the sun is doing while we're stationary?

Haha, gee, I never really noticed how the UN flag kind of looks like the Flat Earth symbol...

>>14610707
Don't suppose there's some weird "Blackrock" at the North Pole is there?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupes_Nigra

>>14610716
It's all probably just a coincidence...

>>14610718
There's just no way these things could be related...

>>14610716
>>14610718
>>14610721
tl;dr quick rundown?

>>14610731
>tl;dr quick rundown?
I'm not sure if they're pure evil, or just incompetently ignorant of the world.
I think it's somewhere in between.

>>14610707
>the UN flag kind of looks like the Flat Earth symbol
other way around, flat earthers just took a polar projection map without thinking

>>14610414
Yes, just lift something up.

Gravitys all wrong, if this threads still up in 24hrs I'll check back maybe give more context.

>>14610426
>string theory
>prediction
Oh, do go on. How specifically is this meant to be measured?

>>14610426
meds. now.

>>14610414
Yes, you just need to accelerate faster than the pull of the gravitational field

>>14610414
Planes exist

>>14610660
This has to be bait.

>>14610414
third law of motion say yes.

>>14610426
I read the brief paper. It is really just about semantics, which is why you have to cite a lone paper from 1979 for this.

>and of a massless vector field which we shall call the antigraviton
A massless vector field is just an ordinary gauge field and the repulsion of "antigravity" is just the ordinary repulsion of like charges. The only thing different is that the mass and charge of the particles are tuned so that the two forces precisely cancel each other due to supersymmetry.

In the real non-supersymmetric world, according to this same logic you could say that "antigravity" dominates gravity since the mass of electrons is not large enough to cancel the electromagnetic repulsion.

>>14610576
This.

>>14613080
True if "we" is taken to mean you and the guy you are quoting

>>14610414
yes, read the rig veda, the ancient aryans used some kind of liquid mercury gyro to do it and the Nazis reproduced it in their foo fighters. Look up the battle over LA and the white house UFO incident and think about the description the WWII airmen had of foo fighters as "glowing orbs"

newton's third law:
for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. if gravity is real, then antigravity is also real.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ning_Li_(physicist)

>>14610707
Gravity is special electromagnetic effect, charges are biased towards attraction

>>14610619
What's the relative speed particles collide in CERN hardon collider if they accelerate them up to 98%?
196% c?

>>14610576
but we do tho.

>>14614714
β2=2β1+β2≈1−(1−β)22≈1−5.4×10−17
3 m/s shy of light speed
https://www.quora.com/When-protons-collide-in-LHC-what-is-the-speed-of-one-proton-beam-relative-to-the-opposite-beam

>>14610414
oc, you should see my auntie

>>14611152
https://youtu.be/19Rv-pG_wvk?t=3m

>>14610414
Nope, but Blender and AfterEffects are