/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12151325
>go to the link if you wanna keep reading
Nah but this sounds like something /x/ would eat right up.

>>12151325
The absolute state of academia lmao

>>12151325
why is this in ncbi? lmao
>>12151334
this

They let schizo publish nowadays?

>>12151325
wait this can't be official isn't it

>Another puzzle in science is the ability of molecules of water for exchanging information with DNAs and storing their information [16], [17], [18]. The chemical structure of water (H2O) is very simple and has no ability to store information. Thus, how these molecules communicate with other molecules and DNAs. Also, it seems that there is a relation between molecules of water, earth and DNA. Because the water of rain has a better effect on the plants and their growth.

>To respond to all of these questions, we should design a model which explains the relationship between earth, water and life. To this aim, we can use ideas of scientists for the existence of a black hole at the centre of the earth. This black hole may be constructed from a DNA black brane with 109 times longer than the core of the earth which is compacted interior of the core. The number of excited states of this object is similar to the number of microstates of a black hole. However, its material is similar to the material of a DNA. This structure produces a temperature around 6000 K which is in agreement with the predicted temperature of the core. Also, this structure is the main cause of the emergence of the magnetic field around the earth and gravitational waves for moving around the sun. We show that DNA black brane of the earth is the biggest system of telecommunications which exchange waves with all DNAs and molecules of water. Also, we introduce a new type of DNAs called dark DNAs on the eleven-dimensional manifold. In fact, on the four-dimensional manifold, DNAs are contracted at least four times around various axes and waves of earth couldn’t read their information. However, by adding extra dimensions, the separation distance between particles increases and all of the information could be recovered by waves.
based

>>12151325
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910787/

Recovery of Brain in Chick Embryos by Growing Second Heart and Brain

>>12151391
Reads like it was generated with AI.

>>12151325
Is this the next Sokal hoax? It's sad because the Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences is one of my favorite publications. Now I'll have to cancel my subscription.

>>12151325

>>12151325
This feels like that Russian fraud who claimed chicken eggs are capable of “biological alchemy” and “organic transmutation”. Reads like a postmodern pseudoscientific art piece a la Spinal Catastrophism.

>>12151325
Sounds like a tight cosmic horror sci-fi writing prompt

>>12151325
yet I can't get published

>>12151358
Author information includes
>Clinic for Psychiatric Disorders "Dr. Laza Lazarevic", Belgrade, Serbia.
So, literally yes.
The authors on this journal volume are mostly dermatologists, with a vast amount of overlap between articles, except for one author affiliated with a nuclear physics department, and one author affiliated with a psychiatric clinic.

>>12152162
Have you tried submitting to the Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences?

>>12151325
M E D S
E
D
S

And bump

>>12152183
That is, if you are willing to pay the publication fee.

>>12152180
Though further research shows that the lead author, Massimo Fioranelli, has published other such innovative papers, including one on how 5G technology induces cornavirus.

>>12151325
Gee, I wonder (((who))) could be behind this post

>>12151325
>109 times

>>12152370
Sloppy job mossad

>>12151325
>109 times

>>12152370
For real what's up with these strange ads? I usually never get ads on mobile, these came out of nowhere today?

What the fuck is brain berries?

>>12152366
Unbelievably based

>>12151325
More evidence that open access journals are hot garbage

>>12152370
>Dead battery
>Catalog mode
Kys zoomer

>>12152439
this nigga doesnt browse in catalog mode lmao

>>12152439
>browsing chans without catalog mode
OH NO NONO NO

BRO THEY PUT THAT OPTION IN AS A JOKE

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Are you the type to click on those 78 slide news stories with 4 words per ad?

>>12152492
kwab

>>12151358
Yes theres a publication about how coronahoax was a from meteorite

>>12152439
>using internet like It's an TV program.
You're fucking tv boomer.

>>12152439
>he doesn't use the catalog
Anon, I...

>>12151325
This has got to be some sort of campaign to make people spout schizo stuff.
This is completely gibberish.

>>12151325
Oh man /x/ is gonna love this shit

The state of Trump's management....

>>12154763
I wanted to see if they would like it. I posted it to /x/ and no one liked it. Sad.

>>12151391
was this parsed through 7 languages in google translate?

What's dark dna

Welcome to trumps America and neo nazi sciences. This is more schizo than trannies and their genders because at least trannies exist

>>12155370
Take a guess.

>>12152449
>>12152452
>>12153799
>>12153822
zoomzoom

>>12151325
lmao these authors are nuts
.RETRACTED: 5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/
>DNA Waves and Their Applications in Biology
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910796/

>>12156078
Formation of Neural Circuits in an Expanded Version of Darwin's Theory: Effects of DNAs in Extra Dimensions and within the Earth's Core on Neural Networks
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31850135/
omg this is great I love this shit

>>12151346
>why is this in ncbi? lmao
that's the real question
It's got the shittiest ranking of any journal I've ever seen on NCBI, I have no idea how it made it past the predatory-schizo-journal status

>>12152180
>Dr. Laza Lazarevic
Kino name

>>12155370
its got a couple of different meanings; the first tongue-in-cheek meaning was conserved non-coding DNA that across mammals (humans, mice chickens) that, when deleted, did nothing to hurt the animals; they bred normally, looked okay, so no known function but yet was still highly conserved. So "dark DNA"; how is it conserved if it doesn't do anything when deleted?
They found out in 2018 that at least some of these ultra-conserved regions actually were gene expression modifiers that led to severe brain development problems, which I guess a retarded mouse acts the same as a normal mouse, so they didn't pick it up right away
the other definition in this paper is in relation to a newscientist article where some dude sequenced a desert rat and couldn't find genes that are required for creation of insulin and yet the rat had insulin. Instead of thinking "I wonder how thi Turns out, there are parts of the genome that sequencers have trouble dealing with and they don't get sequenced, particularly in birds and rodents, and so they dubbed those part of the genomes "dark dna" because they don't show up when you do a full coverage sequencing of the genome.
This paper someone takes dark dna from this second definition to mean "they didn't find the genes, so therefore park of the DNA must exist in another dimension". I have no idea how they decided that.

>>12156119
Chin up buddy, it's not all bad!

>>12155370
Someone let an astrophysicist into the bio lab and now the damage has been done.

>>12156127
But we call that noncoding DNA

>>12156218
the first definition of dark DNA specifically referred to *conserved* noncoding DNA that had no known function

>>12156102
An actual 19th century Serbian writer, psychiatrist, and neurologist, according to WIkipedia.

>>12156268
Do you think dark DNA has the potential for psychic power awakening?

>>12156293
i think it has the potential for me raping your asshole

Is it time to play the mind game now, bros?

>>12152180
>>12156102

Holy shit hahaha im from belgrade serbia, and Laza Lazarevic is an actual mental health institute here - like a sanctuary for crazy people and a junkie recovery center

>>12151554
This but an air that was trained exclusively a mix of legit physics articles and a lot of timecube/Terry Davis/gary

>>12151325
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910781/
helps water store memory.... wtf homeopaths were right all along !!?

>>12152376
>>12152417
think it's a typo.. everywhere else in the paper they use 10^9

>>12155370
Dna made with dark matter

>>12156915
>unironically associating king terry with eugene ray

fuck you

>>12151325
Sounds like a Kojima video game plot lol

>>12156078
https://web.archive.org/web/20200723024542/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/

this shit is pure gold

>>12151325
Holy shit aahahah

>>12151325
This paper reminds me of the 3rd rock from the sun joke, where dick publishes advanced alien science to try to get recognition but everyone just ignores him as some retarded quack spouting inNe bullshit

>>12157693
Jesus FUCK every sentence made me wheeze harder, then I hit
>These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus.
Fucking christ on crackers I can't fucking breathe, this is AMAZING

>>12151325
lol wtf am I reading

Corona is made of black holes?

>>12151325
This is literally the principle source for them
https://youtu.be/WPKO1qtntGs

This thing wasn't written by a human, its why its like a string of illogical statements. An AI wrote this

>>12152071
>Reads like a postmodern pseudoscientific art piece a la Spinal Catastrophism.
This is what paralysis by analysis did to our minds, it completely fried them

>>12156933
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_teleportation

>>12152376
dare I say we have a guy in nasa that is /our guy/

>>12159344
Womp womp looks like I was right

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/03/more-computer-generated-nonsense-papers-pulled-science-journals/358735/
>More than 120 bogus scientific articles have been published in peer-reviewed publications by Springer and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) from 2008 to 2013, according to computer scientist Cyril Labbé, confirming suspicions that sometimes, papers that read like gibberish are actually gibberish. Again.

>>12159389
? Fironelli is in Italy, and not in NASA. His citation to NASA work is through a popularized science article, and likely misinterprets it
So, no, you daren't.

>>12159391
You can literally generate a bullshit scientific article with a website kek. Someone probably just used this on journals without actual peer-reviews even if they claim to have them
https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/

>>12159391
>>12159412
yes, if it reads like non-sense is probably nonsense. is like the jewish holocoust

>A Guardian investigation, in collaboration with German broadcaster Norddeutscher Rundfunk, reveals the open-access publishers who accept any article submitted for a fee

You literally just pay them and they'll publish any sort of non-sensical gibberish
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/10/predatory-publishers-the-journals-who-churn-out-fake-science

>>12159521
>Open Access Publisher Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/nonsense-for-dollars/

>>12151325
Dark dna

>>12159412
So essentially random anons on /sci/ provide a more effective peer review than actual scientific journals

bump

>Open Access Journal of Science
nothing can go wrong guys, freedom is the most important thing, the free market will ensure only good science gets published, academia is shit these days anyway

>>12161584
This article wasn't "peer reviewed", this is mostly a shit-journal no one reads or knows about
The problem is that literally anyone can slap up a "journal" and accept publications. The concern of course is that this is on pubmed, at least for the public. its all well-known in academic circles which labs/journals/names you can trust, and definitely which ones you can't. If you're anywhere at all well-read on a subject, your bullshit meters go off the moment something even remotely scamy shows up. So this is a non-issue for scientists who work in the subject area.
It's also the biggest reasons I hate non-scientists pulling random studies out their ass to "prove" something. The amount of times I've seen people google "X is true study" and then pull the first link in which the abstract remotely supports their ideas is insane. There is a reason it takes years to become a scientist; part of it is knowing the field so well you can immediately smell bullshit. "A little knowledge is dangerous", and I hate how the public thinks they know shit when just because they read an article and don't actually know anything about it, so just start yelling "WHAT ABOUT THE nnnnnnnnn?!?!"

>>12163836
Some veganazi tried to psy op my friend the other day into giving up eggs, showing him fake studies about how they’re going to kill him or something. No one is coming between me and my caviar.

>>12159412
>pdos at mit
i see u minsky

>>12151325

The NIH is embarrassing.

>>12151325
I sincerely hope an AI wrote this and that it wasn't some completely deranged and shattered human mind.