[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 223 KB, 2000x1333, 1_5kc0npTYt9qbDxwaF1-TyA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11631165 No.11631165 [Reply] [Original]

Existence itself is an abomination. There had to be a start somewhere, but what existed before the "start"? Existence shouldn't have happened. Is the universe a circular rotation? Did we spawn from another universe? Where did that universe come from? Existence itself makes no sense. What happened before existence? I try to imagine what was before the big bang and all I can come up with is that we spawned from somewhere else. Can someone with a better understanding explain with a bit more detail?

>> No.11631221

You'll get a bigger response from here
>>/x/

There's really no telling what happened before the big bang. For all we know the big bang theory is bullshit and we actually live in some kind of cycle or something.

>> No.11631223

>>11631165
because non-existence and discrete "starts" and "stops" aren't actually the status quo. The normal condition is constant and cyclical quantum fluctuations which eventually through enough time lead to a creation of a universe because the universe has a non-zero probability of existence.

>> No.11631228

>>11631165
bb wasn't the beginning, just a phase change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO2vfYNaIbk

>> No.11631229

>>11631165
I know the answer, but you'll say that God isn't real.

>> No.11631233

Most likely explanation: universe in a cycle, beginning with big bang and ending with big crunch. More hopeful than heat death, at least

>> No.11631236

>>11631229
I know the answer, but you'll say that Dewi Ibu Partiwi isn't real.

>> No.11631240

Existence alone isnt the problem, but why counsciouness ? If there was no counsciousness, the universe would still existing?
Maybe life is an innerent quality of the matter.

>> No.11631241

>>11631236
Dewi Ibu Partiwi?

>> No.11631246

>>11631165
It's currently unknown ofc and may remain so forever , but this is a clue:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré_recurrence_theorem

>> No.11631249

>>11631165
Before everything, there was a boundless nothingness. This boundless state of things had the possibility to produce anything bounded because if it didn't have the ability to produce such things then the primal state wouldn't be boundless. Therefore all things came into existence, including realities you can't possibly imagine, each reality exclusive of other realities, because otherwise it wouldn't be boundless. And sure there are too lands of nonexistence.

>> No.11631259

>>11631165
How can something theoretically come from nothing. This makes no sense.

>> No.11631273

>>11631221
/x/ is cringe. They are a bunch of schizos.

> we actually live in some kind of cycle or something.

That's what I mean.

>> No.11631282

>>11631165
if you're really open minded and don't mind taking redpills that are hard to find because of disinformation, you should read the Wes Penre papers. good luck OP