[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 323 KB, 1637x2525, scitroll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1148068 No.1148068 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.1148115

I fucking love you, OP

>> No.1148121

GTFO

>> No.1148130

It's like we're in fucking Trolland.

>> No.1148133

mind: blown

>> No.1148136

>>1148068
TRY HARDER TROLL!

0/100

>> No.1148149

Oh wow. I remember when the first iteration of this troll image was made. I suggested the psychology and Portals references. I like the subsequent additions.

>> No.1148150

>>1148136
0/100 = 0/10

>> No.1148158

>>1148150
Which = 0/1

>> No.1148167

Actually, I've had thoughts about the box of mirrors, but it would be of no use. You would never get to use that light anyway.

>> No.1148169

Question for the math fags. You are constructing a box with infinitely reflective material coating the inside of the box. Can you construct the box and an infinitesimally small hole in the box such that you can shine a laser through the hole and never have the light bounce out?

The box may have as many dimensions as n or as few as three.

>> No.1148208

>>1148150
Not necessarily. x/100 is a finer gradient. 0/100 provides a tighter range of possible values. 0/10 mean be anything from 0/100 to 5/100.

>> No.1148219

>>1148208
Bitch that better be inclusive 0/100 to exclusive 5/100.

>> No.1148234
File: 24 KB, 800x590, 1275966989484.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1148234

>>1148169
>infinitely reflective

>> No.1148242

>>1148169
I want to say theoretically yes. I'm not sure though. There is at most a countably infinite amount of points at which the laser beam could be at any given time.

>> No.1148245

>>1148169
I have a better question. Can you construct a polygonal box such that it is impossible to illuminate the entire interior with one point light source?

2-D original formulation.

>> No.1148247

>>1148068
Fascinating. I had NO IDEA that anyone had so much free time on their hands while simultaneously being so utterly devoid of common sense, that they'd think that this would actually troll anyone effectively. Just. Wow.

>> No.1148268

>>1148219
Depends on rounding practices. I assume that you want 0.5 to round to 1. However, in many contexts, that's a poor practice. It makes the average artificially high. I prefer to round 5 to make the least significant even. That would mean [0,5].

>> No.1148288

>>1148247
are you fucking retarded?

what OP was doing is a parody of the usual retarded troll threads, a compilation

>> No.1149540
File: 434 KB, 2437x4574, HomeworkUpdate5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1149540

Ahh, it's so nice to see people spreading my beautiful work.

I've now made another updated version of the ultimate troll image. I may work on it tomorrow; the car doesn't look that nice yet (doesn't fit the artistic style) and there's lots of other things I can probably include.

Hope you enjoy it!

>> No.1149563

I don't see a guido in the picture.