/sci/ - Science & Math

You have to go back.

>>11465895
/sci/ Race & IQ
literally kill yourself

>>11465898
>go back to epic reddit
le no loser

>>11465903

>>11465898
Where? /pol/?
/sci/ is a race realist board, faggot

>>11465895
>racism can cause race gaps
>environmental factors can be somewhat responsible for race gaps
But yes, race is genetic and there can be genetic factors that lead to one group outperforming others in specific areas e.g. sports, literature/language etc.

>>11465895
>race realism
>but arabs aren't white
you literally have to pick one or gb2p

>>11465908
Back to r*ddit, retard.

>>11465921
>schizo tier reading comprehension

>>11465895
>admitting you come from reddit
You must return!

>>11465942
>>admitting you come from reddit
Where did i admit that? I went there to see what they say about race realism, knowing that reddit has a leftist bias. I had a debate, posted evidence for the existence of race, got banned.

>>11465946
> I went there
Go back and don't return here.

>>11465946
>I went there to see what they say about race realism, knowing that reddit has a leftist bias. I had a debate, posted evidence for the existence of race, got banned
Are you 15 years old?

>>11465895
Those are the realities of race though anon, sounds like they are the race realists

Remember to sage and report all r*ddit threads. It seems like we are being raided right now.

>>11465951
No.

>>11465954
Yet the humans have sufficient heterozygosity to determine sub-speciation based on other species with similar levels of heterozygosity.
The more SNPs considered, the easier it is to differentiate population groups with self-identified race matching almost perfectly.
There's the existence of racial gaps in the Minnesota transracial adoption study, there's gaps when controlling for school and familial income.
You have US black scoring below eastern European whites and east asians despite the obvious environmental advantage.
You have the gaps correled with test g loading.
Blacks have higher self-confidence and self perceived intelligence

So tell me where it's wrong?

>>11465961
Cope harder

>>11465974
I literally don't fucking care about race&IQ. I just don't want redditors on my board. They ruin everything they touch.

Imagine if you had an interest in science that wasn't politically motivated

>>11465895
They want you back.

>>11465908
why is /sci/ a race realist sub? how do you know?

>>11465914
Don't forget street shitting

>>11466009
because its everything realist because science is about realism and race is a subset of everything

>>11465903
based

>>11465895
>reddit

>>11466080
nigger, reddit is awesome 4cuck user

>>11465895
218. Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy. His beliefs are not easily modified by logic or facts. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a capital R, and that he has not only a right but a duty to impose leftist morality on everyone. (However, many of the people we are referring to as “leftists” do not think of themselves as leftists and would not describe their system of beliefs as leftism. We use the term “leftism” because we don’t know of any better words to designate the spectrum of related creeds that includes the feminist, gay rights, political correctness, etc., movements, and because these movements have a strong affinity with the old left. See paragraphs 227-230.)

>>11466098
always based

>>11465895
Because like most of /sci/ they're of temperament that only respects that which they associate with information that can be proven explicitly, they're socially primed to reject the recognition of racial differences in cognition because they have strongly associated it, based on their encounters, with the fact that most people know this by instinct and are satisfied with that, not requiring a scientific description of why it's correct. Only in the West is this instinct beaten out of you.
An unbiased look at the science (biologically, not statistically) actually supports the instinctual view that human races are subspecies, but to accept it means also accepting that your instinct was right before you knew it was right in any way that you could articulate. It would require a difficult change in their conscious philosophy.

Consider that /sci/ is one of the major containment boards for schoolies, and it shouldn't surprise you that only a small fraction are old enough to have matured past this. Your reddit board is the same. Except for the subsection of them who are by their nature very conformant to their peer group in academia beyond youth, they'll mostly outgrow it in a few years.