[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 76 KB, 419x449, cat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11175440 No.11175440[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Science is objective guise and not at all political and (((controlled)))

University dumps professor who found polar bears thriving despite (((climate change)))
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/20/susan-crockford-fired-after-finding-polar-bears-th/

>> No.11175443

>>11175440
>>>/x/
>>>/pol/

>> No.11175462

>>11175443
>>>/lgbt/

>> No.11175466

>>11175443

not an argument

>> No.11175491

Laws of physics
Mathematics
Chemistry

All of the above are objective and completely testable. It's impossible for them to become political. Climate Change is a cross section of physics, mathematics (statistics) and chemistry. Therefor the predictions made with the models are easily testable and falsifiable to the point where it can't be politicized.

The only argument you can make is that the people make false poltical conclusions based on real science. Not that the science in itself is political since it's based on the objective measurements and underlying physical qualities of the universe.

>> No.11175501

>>11175491
contemporary climate science is based on a load of bunk premises

>> No.11175549
File: 1.16 MB, 316x200, joker2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11175549

>>11175491
>All of the above are objective and completely testable. It's impossible for them to become political

>> No.11175668

>>11175549
Go ahead and elaborate your bait

>> No.11175670

>>11175501
Such as?

>> No.11175671

>>11175440
She wasn't fired from her job, she lost an unpaid affiliation with the University of Victoria. Also her opinion about polar bears is worthless.

https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/financial-post-publishes-misleading-opinion-misrepresents-science-polar-bears-peril-susan-crockford/

>> No.11175747

>>11175466
What fucking argument is there?
>hehe da Jews control science
Jesus... one day you’ll learn that not every fucking pathetic excuse of a question deserves a formulated response?
This is like someone saying the earth of flat. Why should people engage in their discussions with the intention to argue the correct shape of the earth when the only reason the person believes the earth is flat is because they are inherently ignorant. If you WANT an argument - great, but you need to put in the same amount of quality you expect; when engaging in the argument. You say “>>>/pol/“ (etc.) is not an argument but ignorance isn’t one either.

>> No.11175762
File: 99 KB, 566x943, pol card.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11175762

>this thread

>> No.11175771

>>11175668
That wan't the question or the point first off it is about the fact that what is being presented to people through "publications" and textbooks as truth is well known not to be true and anyone that bucks the dogma is buried.

Second off things that appear to be true due to dressing up a pile of turds like climate change and space time/dark matter etc are indeed testable and objective yet people still believe in complete and total nonsense which is promoted via the above method I already mentioned.

>> No.11175772
File: 26 KB, 287x431, hoesmad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11175772

>>11175747
>>11175762
not an argument

>> No.11175775

>>11175671
>https://climatefeedback.org
Ahh yes this sounds like a highly reputable objective source you found there anon, great investigate work and semantics

>> No.11175778

>>11175671
ROFL at this website HAHAHAHA.

>> No.11175790

>>11175775
>attacks source
>doesn't even explain how the source is bad
Not an argument. So I guess you agree Crockford is full of shit.

>> No.11175809

>>11175772
Interesting