/sci/ - Science & Math

define "reddit"

define /sci/

>>11079378
Pro feminism,has normie speech patterns and intolerant to non conformist ideas such as race realism.

All of 4chan is now reddit, retard.

>>11079387
>why isnt everyone on /sci/ a braindead racist like me??!! reeeeeee

go back to /pol/

>>11079387
>has normie speech patterns
>normie
You have to go back

/sci/ in particular is the board where authority is taken as a valid source of information, which is the most reddit thing there is.
Even /pol/tards make fewer appeals to authority than /sci/
Established dogma is extremely important in the "scientific community"

>>11079399
NOOOOO
YOU CAN"T TALK ABOUT ANYTHING RELATED TO METAPHYSICAL REALISM
IT'S PSEUDOSCIENCE!!

>>11079359
Any response I make may be construed as reddit, best not to respond

>>11079408
If you are incapable of deviating from your NPC dialogue routine, then yes, normalfag. Also please fuck off my board and REEEEEEE

>>11079412

>>11079387
>non conformist ideas

fucking lmao

>>11079412
This but unironically

>>11079387
>non conformist ideas such as race realism

>>11079432
High IQ smuggie. These same people who are currently "race realists" would oppose it if the scientific consensus was supporting it instead.

>>11079359
90% of the shit here is either schizophrenia or elaborate trolling. Yes, even pretending to care about muh nature to trigger /pol/ is actually just trolling. The people who unironically care and think that they're in good company are dumb redditors

>>11079406
metaphysics is by definition not a scientific discipline but philosophy instead.

It is offtopic for /sci/ because it isn't science just like gender studies and art aren't science.

>>11079359
>>11079387
probably because /sci/ is by far the most educated board.
>inb4 /lit/
bunch of humanities BA’s who read fiction after they’re done teaching middle school english

>>11079545
Right, I forgot that the the only scientific approach to quantum mechanics is to refuse to interpret it. Sorry, I feel so btfo I'll just go blog about it on /r9k/

>>11079412
This but applying to to you too

>>11079556
>muh interpretations of QM
robots and their memes, every single time

>>11079406
Retard lmao

>>11079387
>and intolerant to non conformist ideas such as race realism.
It's because race realism isn't a real scientific idea. It goes against almost everything we know about genetics, epigenetics and basic evolutionary concepts. Anyone that actually looked at the numbers and read the papers about this topic know that race realism is just pseudoscience based upon misinterpertation of a very low sample set of data. It's the anti-vax equivalent of racial studies.

If the actual numbers and studies said something else than I would've personally promoted the lynching of niggers. However that isn't the case and since I and most of /sci/ is the type of person that base their worldview on raw data and change it accordingly it's only rational that most of /sci/ would shun race realism as the pseudo-bullshit it is.

/sci/ is apolitical we hold the view that the data suggests is closest to actual reality. No one gives a fuck about politics.

/sci/ is just as likely to say political incorrect stuff if the science determines that to be the case. For example /sci/ doesn't support transgender trash because it's unscientific.

Therefor /sci/ isn't "reddit" since reddit is mostly preoccupied with certain political views. People like you are as well just in the opposite way to reddit. /sci/ just acts based on what the numbers and models tell us about reality no matter what the political opinions about those things are.

If anything both "your type" and "reddit" are faggots. Leave /sci/ alone with your bullshit.

>>11079560
>>11079561
>>11079562
Lots of (you)s tonight. Makes my dick hard to see you normies take the bait. So fucking predictable.

>>11079567
>tonight
ah okay, from the poor side of the globe, makes sense

>>11079387
Race realism is stupid but I still hate niggers.
I legitimately dont think anyone likes niggers, most people who claim to like them are either virtue signalling or pushing some sort of agenda.
Niggers cause a shit ton of crime, smell bad, are loud and annoying, everywhere they live is a fucking dump, they're also very fucking ugly and generally have no sense of fashion or Style.
They're most definitely the cockroach of mankind.

>>11079580
This. Just because I don't like niggers doesn't mean I'm suddenly going to delude myself in believing bullshit like race realism.

Believing in things because you like the idea of it is some of the most retarded things you can do. Also there is a difference between your rational view of the world and your emotional wants and needs.

>>11079399
thanks for proving op's point

>>11079545
Your reddit is showing fren.

>>11079566
>If the actual numbers and studies said something else than I would've personally promoted the lynching of niggers.
That's the problem right there. You start off by assuming that race realism is about lynching niggers, so then when the science doesn't tell us to lynch niggers you take that to mean that race realism is not scientific.

>>11079567
three one line (You)s is commendable but unspectacular. getting niggers like the one above you to write posts visible from outer space is the holy grail

>>11079587
What I said was a purely factual statement. If that is "reddit" then sure /sci/ is the epitome of reddit.

>>11079378
>>11079386
Define "define"

>>11079588
He said that he'd lynch niggers IF race realism was scientific to begin with.

Also, most people who describe themselves as "race realist" wanted to lynch niggers even before they realised that it was a thing (which is why it's more of a political than scientific ideology).
You might say that YOU don't want to. But an exception is not the rule.

*ahem

fuck Redditors

>>11079566
could you be anymore dishonest? you have no real arguments here whatsoever as to why the topic shouldn't be discussed much less as to why it isn't scientific

>It's because race realism isn't a real scientific idea. It goes against almost everything we know about genetics, epigenetics and basic evolutionary concepts
no it does not, the only way it does this is if you use the boring semantic argument against race, it's technical definition and then get into the whole 'race doesn't exist' red herring territory
>Anyone that actually looked at the numbers and read the papers about this topic know that race realism is just pseudoscience based upon misinterpertation of a very low sample set of data
what numbers and what papers specifically? is your knowledge on the topic so great that you can speak on everyone else's behalf when it comes to interrupting statistics and data?
>If the actual numbers and studies said something else than I would've personally promoted the lynching of niggers
how honorable of you, but to imply that is the only reason why people would be interested in finding the truth less so
>However that isn't the case and since I and most of /sci/ is the type of person that base their worldview on raw data and change it accordingly it's only rational that most of /sci/ would shun race realism as the pseudo-bullshit it is.
but the numbers do indeed suggest differences that perhaps can't be easily explained away by social-economic differences hence the controversy on the subject. the issue at hand is we currently have no way of proving it one way or the other or deciding what would be done if anything once proven

>>11079599
>He said that he'd lynch niggers IF race realism was scientific to begin with.
Yeah, because he thinks it's about lynching niggers. Why would he lynch niggers if it wasn't about lynching niggers ?

>>11079406
get help

>>11079624

>>11079612
/sci/ never spoke against these numbers. The only sticking point is "race-realism" which isn't supported by the actual studies out there and is just delusional wishful thinking by racists.

>>11079624
Socio-economic factors do not exist because sociology and economics are made up. Literally all behaviors are learned behaviors. It's purely biological factors or head on back.

>>11079630
>>11079627
Hey Reddit, what's wrong?

>>11079627
Help with what?

>>11079387
>>11079624
>>11079634
Here's some race realism for you schizos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence