/sci/ - Science & Math

>scientists still don't understand how these work
What's the point of these guys?

Because I'm trying my best and it's just insanity because it's almost a self evidentiary thing.
All I can say to have accomplished is either hallucination of no response.
Or have kicked Neil Turok in the ego, because I've pinpointed his bias as admitting failed investment to a thing that had issues on parer as a concept at this point in the game is so embarrassing that a logic falicay quip that means if better shows. say it's proporter is irrational by extension if current ability to test it is unfound.
Not flawd in any other way. Just because it's conundrum to relative measures.

That dark matter is still likely. Because you can test it vicariously with a balloon simulator.

Logic need not apply.

>>10831582
yes we do. it’s just that showing brainlets quantum mechanical ising models doesn’t help them and they blame it on us instead of their low IQ

>>10831569
>It's not magic, it's magnetic
What do you think "magnet" was named after?

>>10831612
Explain how and why magnets do what they do.

>>10831701
internal interactions between atoms in certain materials lead to an alignment of the atoms' intrinsic magnetic moments that come from spin. the ising model is a simple example of this. so they basically naturally form something resembling a solenoid electromagnet in classical electromagnetism. solenoid electromagnets in classical E&M are undergrad tier to understand, so hopefully that answers it. if not i can post some photos of my griffiths textbook.

>>10831713
>internal interactions between atoms in certain materials
Last time I checked, magnetism has an effect on every single material in existence.

>lead to an alignment of the atoms' intrinsic magnetic moments that come from spin
So spin causes magnetism is what you're saying? Or is it geomancy?

>ising model
description

>naturally form something resembling a solenoid electromagnet in classical electromagnetism
"Magnetism is magnetism".

>solenoid electromagnets in classical E&M are undergrad tier to understand.
Yet you can't even explain how and why a magnet works.

>if not i can post some photos of my griffiths textbook.
No, I want an explanation.

>>10831762
Look up a "core memory" It's a early data storage for computers.
It operates much the same way as magnets. Bit simplyed as

If we know arrangement. We can pass another magnetism though with a predictable outcome.
Even if you pass more than one. And they cross pathings.

It's basically digital Velcro.

>>10831770
>Look up a "core memory" It's a early data storage for computers.
>It operates much the same way as magnets

I mean, it magnetizes ferrite cores I get that. In many ways it's like RAM today.

>It's basically digital Velcro.
It basically doesn't explain what causes magnetism.

>>10831783
A cataclysmic certainty derriered form nonexistent?
That's as core explination We've got afaik.

But it's a sin imparted from that event that caused Pi to be and for interlacing as a binder agent to be logical. As action of a "On or Droop" based system

It's like Halbach array are born with causality just happenstance they cluster with Planck qbits at differential volume/size/arrangement

A event horizon is a weak side out array that is so dence the strengt of it;s good side interlases so well it max foces matter to a pont, and restively is stable to have the array. exist ququial to the matter it contains as qbits to it's edge.

A Halbach array in black hole term mde of magnets. Would have such sporadic pole splitting. It's logical to assume quantum.
https://pastebin.com/P52F4zm2

>>10831783
Oh. and the fist three fames the quantum stack mmust pass though to a more inactive place.
It implodes to cause more action.Snale eating itself.

>>10831597
what in the stupid fucking garbage are you talking about? what in the actual stupid fuck

>>10831822
Well give premise that needs better definition. And I'll see if I can satiate that.

Ironically that;s literally the whole point. As why it became.
Why it's enacted as it was. And why it continues.

>>10831814
>A cataclysmic certainty derriered form nonexistent?
From nothing come nothing though so that's obviously not the answer. I'm gonna assume that the rest of your words equate to "geomancy", right?

>>10831817
>It implodes to cause more action.Snale eating itself.
Infinite regress? But why? Why would a snale(snake) eat itself?

>>10831833
Logically someingdoes come form nothing.
As Zero has no time for inaction.
action only ever results. And its because action is at a minimum to situate satisfaction to logic that it imparts a Magnitude of greater potential if new ways, that resolves to a finite move possible.

This isn't like I've invented a new math function that's a generator of particular results fitting a postulation in observed rational conceived.

>>10831833
>to "geomancy", right?

No... Cant have it be ridiculed as Kinematics

>Infinite regress? But why? Why would a snale(snake) eat itself?
because literally lack of frames of reference. Does a vector result. A straight line can't know existence in a zero bound object.
And deviance when potential is unknown.I cohabitant with reality as known.

>>10831822
i posted that post about how the using model is a basic way to understand why certain materials form things like classical solenoid electromagnets. the other posters here are schizos and electric universetards who have deluded views on magnetism (they think it’s like some mystical qi that rules the universe ) so just ignore them. it’s a problem here on /sci/ because of popular fringe pseudoscience memes that dupe normies and schizos into new age psedoscience that makes no sense

>>10831847
*ising model not “using model”

>>10831839
>Logically someingdoes come form nothing.
Put a 0 in a ratio and watch what happens. Hence the term "rational"; to be in accordance with reason or logic

>As Zero has no time for inaction.
Zero has no basis in reality. If anything it would be inaction itself. What an absurd statement.

>action only ever results. And its because action is at a minimum to situate satisfaction to logic that it imparts a Magnitude of greater potential if new ways, that resolves to a finite move possible.

Which doesn't just come from nothing.

>This isn't like I've invented a new math function that's a generator of particular results fitting a postulation in observed rational conceived.
Personally, I don't believe math can even answer my question.

>>10831847
I give a motion and not a problem is found.
>ERROR 500,
You're not giving any reason. as why toy object with a tangible thing that disproves possibility of potential.

Literally you're name calling. As method of self preservation of an ideal.
That's not logical. You are at critical error.

>>10831847
read
>>10831762
You never explained a goddamn thing nor followed up to the questions I brought up.

>>10831865
here, young anon, is an example of a schizo post. ignore

>>10831569
>If you cant explain it to a five year old, you cant understand it

>>10831869
okay, well you are an electric universe idiot shilling nothing but nonsense word salad. how about you read a textbook on classical EM and then read something about the using model and then come back with specific questions.

oh wait, you failed calculus and aren’t able to do that. well sorry anon, i have no time for pseudoscience electric universe retards since you guys are insufferable with your endless meaningless rhetorical questions and inability to recognize the difference between clear mathematical models vs. word salad nonsense

>>10831883
goddamn. i meant “ising” not “using”. again. stupid phone

>>10831860
When I use zero point. I mean totality broken as it;s not denotative of anything. even zero.
Like insane zero. It done not have a correlation that's conceptual.
So either it's presence with destroy or create. Any in-between is a definable object.

No I think that it's a constant collapse birthing matter. As pi inciting itself is forever adding length in all axis's.

>>10831869
Self evidently rational whilst maintain irrationality. You're welcome.

>>10831883
Because mechanism is not known to equate a thing. The thing doesn't exist?
You can't see what you're saying can you?

>>10831910
not the anon i was replying to. you get an ignore since you’re a schizo

btw i was that anon who said thanks for you out schizo-ing the newage clamp schizo in one of the latest clamp threads. we can form an alliance, as long as you do the schizo stuff in schizo threads while i do science stuff in science threads

>>10831889
>When I use zero point. I mean totality broken as it;s not denotative of anything. even zero.
Fair enough

>No I think that it's a constant collapse birthing matter. As pi inciting itself is forever adding length in all axis's.
>constant collapse birthing matter.
Okay I think I see where you're going with this. I once heard an analogy involving octaves. "do re mi fa so la ti" is still "do re mi etc." even in a lower octave. No change is inherent and the scaling is the same.

>>10831904
>Self evidently rational whilst maintain irrationality.
Self evidently rational? Want to explain that some more?

>>10831569
ok

>>10831920
It's not irrational because a fuck nuance for he sale of it complex.

It's fucking stacked with rational explanation.
>alliance
Well so long as you act with purpose. It's with rationality.
And there' a subset here that uses anything they can to protect a ideal they cant define other than by
...
citation.

If it's a new concept that wasn't used in some QM thought game. Then it's not a real thing to them.

I've clipped Neil Turok from Perimeter Institute saying directly.can measure something as of this instant. It's more likely that the postulator is incorrect
*ahem*

Pi foundation/institute
Synonymous with metaphysics being further defined to grant first measurement,
A Poster boy of Nerdic aspiration because proximity to hawking.

Came out and said that.
Right after he rationalized with mental acrobatics why dark matter may still be measurable afer all this effort.
Something on paper to exist with and as a abhorrent & inconstant to logic and universal norms.
Is more tenable to a sane person. Than something that conforms to all possibility.

You can almost see the self preservation ooze out of hm as if the aether is a thing.

https://youtu.be/f1x9lgX8GaE?t=5254

>>10831951
Sci achieve first xxXSuiseisekiXxx usage. And sluice out my prior posts in that thread.
This was doomed to happen. Exponentially as is continued to inure.

>>10831974
Inquire*

>>10831967
>trash talking

Nope I've quantified the problem.

You'll fuckers afraid to be worng. Even if it was because an old man lead you astray with citation trendies and literal mental exercises to conform to a position.

Because no one else has noticed how much rape is happening.
Therefore it's imagined. Or would it be as it is now.

In doing so, you're expressing a genetic rape,
Because it's a change in improvement as a result of ancestral actions.

>>10832003
Why are you arguing with a litteral retard. Your opponent has the mental capacity of Insane Clown Posse, who gives a shit if your right or smarter when compared to someone of the likes of him.

>>10832009
No, you're missing the blatant point.
There's think that think dismissal of of a thing. It a greater way to attain what ever it is, relative to a better intellect outcome.

Literally dismissing a potential, for want off knowledge, as a method of attaining intellectualism.

And those who are trained the same way. To conform to rote and rules that came from people so far remove from conceptual origins of thought and implied fallacy. That something that wasn't told when created. that it's to be put to effect century's after the fact.

You see the recursive oops happening?

>>10832032
I am not even sure what your trying to say. Your dropping words from your sentances.

Intentionally taking bait to try to educate some dipshit who only wants to waste your time is not going to accomplish anything of value.

>>10832035
And that's a result blind allegiance to something fitting relative framework that requited a hot fix.
With a something from nothing action.

>>10831974
>>10831975
>>10832032
Okay well whatever point you made was completely lost to your infuriatingly pointless shorthand.
Back on topic: What fucking causes magnetism?

>>10832041
Okay schitzo

>>10832043
The spin of an electron. It gives it a weak charge that when aligned that weak force can be strong enough to be considerable beyond the atomic level.

>>10832035
Oh and if toy actually thought beyond this dielectric fags being Buddhist and or stoners.

My cascade is just a obfuscated singularity with a bit per bit reason to detonation having imbalance,

So ther's more to read between the lines. Then the confines of just a few minds.

>>10832043
Well it's a inertia of points causing friction as an action in 3d space so that it's easier to pull inwards then clash. If it exists in a spherical arrangement.
As 'crystalline' lattices forms of magnetic are more prone to arrangement of Halbach arrays that don't interact with weak forms of Halbach array. Because of the arrangement of qbuits to make it between zones have a differential, due to Pi giving more room from a center axiom in relation to distance.

>>10832047
>The spin of an electron
So it's "spin" then? Spin is magnetism? Only of an electron? What is spinning in a magnet? It's a stagnant object.
>It gives it a weak charge
How does it "give" it? Where did it get it from? "Charge" of what?

>>10832063

>Well it's a inertia of points causing friction as an action in 3d space so that it's easier to pull inwards >inertia of points causing friction

Two point of inertia that are fighting each other you mean? Acceleration?

>As 'crystalline' lattices forms of magnetic are more prone to arrangement of Halbach arrays that don't interact with weak forms of Halbach array. Because of the arrangement of qbuits to make it between zones have a differential, due to Pi giving more room from a center axiom in relation to distance.

But what causes magnetism though?

>>10832066
It's not insane that action acts upon action.

>How does it "give" it? Where did it get it from? "Charge" of what?
My Quantum stacking, That because of abhorrent inaction m ust have caused action. That to sustain action. Action much act in case of inaction.

At I've said exorbitance to three fames. 1, ^3, 2.
Where would least action logically be?
Some where 'left and down' yet canted off the horizon of 1.
This would cause a Quantuim stack to /pass/ though matter. Giving somehting irrational like a reversal of acceleration at perceived velocity gain.

>>10832079
>But what causes magnetism though
Shear incoherence..

And it's crazy enough it just might works. As irrationally is inherent to determine a rationalization of matter. As we already know it,.

There''s nothing /new/.. Just it's explained differently.
Not taking place holder measurement and tarding about, espousing it as anything other than Kinematics.

>>10832081
>It's not insane that action acts upon action.
No, I never said it was.

>My Quantum stacking, That because of abhorrent inaction m ust have caused action. That to sustain action. Action much act in case of inaction.
Does not follow, action is not a quantity.

>>10832094

Shear incoherence..
Of what? Or it doesn't matter what?

>There''s nothing /new/.. Just it's explained differently.
But you haven't explained anything at all. Quantum, but what is the quantity of this action you refer to? Again it's just half hearted shorthand.

>Not taking place holder measurement and tarding about, espousing it as anything other than Kinematics.
So it's motion/action or the loss of motion then?

>>10832108
>No, I never said it was.
Yet you acted as if you had some reason for that.
You see, the more question why action is. The deeper it is rationally, irrational.

So in any good theory. You should aim for most definitive outcome reasonable.
And reasonable not not exist is logaically what should be correct.

So something corrupt to a absolute truism. Must be at play. And In a way that's close to rational. As it's an escalation of potential. attack. And those are always abusive of the core system.

>But you haven't explained anything at all. Quantum

How can I converse alone? About something I understand?
But wasn't taught of by a universally accepted method?
And also this is something of a curiosity that gained more credibility. the longer it remained without question.
And question as it its,. Is better descriptive words. To quantify /new/ concepts more clearly..

The action is reliant of self evidentiary expression.
Operationalization and Conceptual definition are to have a fight.
And the bookies are to go broke, because someone fucked up what color shorts are whose.

>So it's motion/action or the loss of motion then?
Well first instance would be a gain but it couldn't have know if it was a result of loss.
It's a wonky action because frames of reference are definitive if they are to come not just exist as was.

So basically it's that fucked up at birth it went of to master all. Because it's novelty was such that it was unimpeded.

>>10832108
And yes I''d currently a perpetual singularity reformation and rebirth. But Pi exuberance insists matter is gained.

The view outside says this is far form first rodeo.

>>10831829
nobody is this stupid. It's impossible

>>10832166
Kek

>>10832166
I've learn many things form doing things that aren't really anything structured.
But what comes form it can be very telling.

>>10832166
the real question is, why don't mods ban this guy?

>>10832192
Is this a gay fur thread?
That's all I know that consistently gets me banned.
Rule 1's don't stick. Not because of IP switching ether.

>>10832186
are you constructing sentences with the autocorrect word suggestions?

>>10832230
no, i think he’s either a legit schizo or some autist’s shitposting machine learning project

>>10832230
No this is what happens when the problem is how to infer a logical sequence. That's not verry relative to a object that's known..
So 'm drained.

I'm that hyper-extended that I'm actually half mashing words at the speed of thought.
Because I can't keep up whit ways to not to be able to explain it concisely.

And it's approaching ad infinitum because for relevance to be attained, for a system not defined by the one people believe to be true.
Because they have munted logic as causation to their bias being logical but inequitable and in observable when obvious.

>>10832140
>>10832247
>>10832186
You are almost as infuriating as reading Plotinus, but I'll keep reading what you have to say only because you're literally the type of person that has the predisposition to answer the nature of an equally infuriating and incomprehensible question. A lot of anons are going to give me shit for that but idgaf.
>>10832230
>>10832234
He's using shorthand either because what he talks of "goes without saying" and words cannot express the point he's making
Or you're right and this is drug induced rants. None the less he's right in that the structuring and ordering of words has no meaning when talking about that which is incomprehensible. Or at least seemingly incomprehensible. It would be absolutely no different he spoke purely in internet memes instead of regular memes.

>>10833161
>talking about that which is incomprehensible
its not incomprehensible you stupid fuck its been comprehended by physicists for years you just don't get it you faggot that doesn't make it magic you retard

>>10833161
Another anon. Maybe explaining as simple as possible is going to give an answer? Its a will to exist. Schopenhauer's answer. Everything in this world(except trannies) strives to live. These objects striving to connect to each other which we call magnets are demonstrating their 'will'(not as human 'will') to survive. Hwo they know it will help them to survive? I dunno though.

>>10833223
THEN EXPLAIN IT. Don't keep restating the premise and describing the effects.

>>10833239
If it's the "will to live" then a magnet would be a "source of will". I suppose that's a better explanation than geomancy or "spin". Doesn't go too far in depth, but I guess that's the point.

>>10833265
what's your problem with spin, anon? that's the correct answer tbqh

tesla and ken wheeler schizos should fucking die.

they shit every thread about electromagnetism...

every fucking thread!

and its interesting that when theres an electronics thread they never show up...I mean they KNOW SO MUCH about the EM phenomena... you think they'll understand "real world behaviour" of EM right?

>>10833291
i know, it’s so fucking annoying. pseudoscience should be bannable but unfortunately the only guardian against the EUtard memers are like 3 physics grad student anons that have lost their patience by now

>>10833291
What a waste of copper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coznZbYp190

>>10833297
is not really EU its specifically ken wheelers fans you can inmidiately know who they are because they are so simpleton that they constantly use the same words as the fat fuker

any time you heard this words in EM threads is a ken wheeler fan:

PLOTINUS, CONTRA-SPACE, INCOMMENSURABLE, DIELECTRICITY, INERTIA, ACCELERATION, FORCE-AND-MOTION...

other red flag is they post things like: "what it is not what it does."

this fuckers are so retarded that they uses exactly the same wording as the fat fucker, its pathetic

pic is also related

this fucker claimed an "anti-gravity" device many years ago... of course nothing came out of it.

>>10831569
>It's not magic, it's magnetic
Whats the difference?

>>10833355
Buddy, it's literally ken trying to get people into his cult and to buy his book. He pulls the same shit on /p/

>>10833510
You mean his free book?

>>10833622
it can be downloaded for free but if you read the intro it says it’s 10 USD. because like a true electromagnetic genius he made it a PDF instead of using kindle or something

>>10833265
electrons moving in space? im not a physicist either you worthless faggot

>>10833161
Let's rewind to an old tact.

0 velocity, 0 matter, 0 time, 0 space.
0 = 1 of nothing. Nothing has infinite boundary, infinite measurement, infinite potential.

Boom!

Zero has been defined to exist. 1st dimension born.
What's the next logical course of action?
To go in a random direction till you run into your own ass.
2nd dimension is formed. Well we're still at impossible object meets impossible force,
Something's got to give.
Deviance of course and wait to come back for the 3rd so on and forth.
(I think nothing higher than 4d as it's just non frame data. Like signal clipping.)

Forever plotting infinite courses though a infinite 'super absolute solid'.
With that, all courses are accessible at all times.
But it can never hit a boundary. As the transition to the second dimension created a vector.
Because you can't maintain a straight course without 2 frames of reference,
If you're familiar with pi analytics, you'd be aware of it's irrationality and normality.
I believe this would also apply to the superstructure, because of the vectoring.
Nothing is moving, only plotting can/has happen/d.
Conceptual data is incorporeal because it's defined within a course.

All courses are connected. So irrationality and normality exists by default on any course by extension.
Time is nonexistent. Only where it's been is known. What lays ahead is unwritten, but effected by previous paths it knows it's coming upon.

A collapse witnessing itself.
There's not size or thing. It can never ever have a reference fame that it smaller than a bit.
Or larger than the sum whole of its operation.
It's purely relative to itself. Acts only with it's self. As definitive reactions.

Imagine a random 3d number grid. And computing the total internet as a save to it's composition.
Or 2d images made by vectorization. They as purely math. That if passed though the right decoder.
Can make anything.

>>10835766
>what's decoding it prove god faggot?
Here's why quantum comes into play.
It knows itself after a intercession.

It's default pi. So it's previous values act with rationality.
At what point it knows, I can't say for sure.
Because it's not decided how it's quantum stacking well behave.

I can postulate only so much, as to say it's imbalanced because of the first conundrum.
That's easy enough to /know/ at this early stage.
And it's befitting what I know of current Big bang detonation modeling.
But, Does it stay that way?

I never have I to ever did I. That something so profound, as to were if shortsighted am I.
That thou whatever the measure to whatever if ever, that it must make sense to I.
I can never be sure as to all that is of course.
But if there is course for a horse to trot on before force, then of coarse that's the horse I will ride that's for sure.
As to what not be a faggot as am I.

>>10835766
>>10835809
It was a bad line and a prank call, someone spouting insane babble. I couldn't make sense of it.

>>10835766
>I think nothing higher than 4d as it's just non frame data. Like signal clipping

This is a hard one.
I've all most system hanged myself as to try and visualize it.
It could purely be that Pi's value is the solve. As it's basically reality hacking.

Or there's a more complex notion between vector points.
In my function overview of formulas. There may be a secondary constant to be found.
But as a incredibly high compute value.
I'd like to imagine that it's the antistant.
It can exist on paper. But never actually be run on a device. It's just that insanely consumptive.
I hope to see such a thing.

>>10835825
If you've read that "As to what not be a faggot as am I" and thought it to be a trlololo moment.
You're surly mistaken.

As I don't care if I'm seen to be queer/
I'm placing my chips on a horse that's got insane chance to win.

>>10835840
>if it's just math how is it also matter?
Well it's got to have a value.
A value denotes a action. And as path of cascade sequence.
It will have an adjective value adjacent/s.
This will result in counter directions to be related.
This is what gives a / field/.
As all values have a potential.
This are parts of arrays. Halbach arrays.

A array can exist only so much before a larger array.
The Halbach array are point to radius related in forces.
Forces across arrays are only stable because of the interchange between their /slin/.
A black hole for example would be the sum of matter consumed to qbits as it's event horizion.
This is because, as a weak force. They are extreme in array density to be stable.
And must be exist out side of the singularity.
The force on singularity side of the horizons would be pressure of matter to horizon.
So this would give a relative point to possibly measure.
So that with atom smashing. We might design arrays that are unique for a particle.
And that also arrays can have non uniform fields. This gives a wide variability to inter field action.
>explain light
I'm not that far into certainty.
But I'm amused at torque rifles.
That a flip chain reaction. can happen.
This is a rifled event. That it's a fluted field impaired by coaxial torsion.
>still breaks some law
May not. We haven't ascertained inter array consumption.
That is how much it cost a bit to have a alignment per pattern.
This would also allow for Bohmian state to be c0onsistant.
As it can motion ahead of a photon relative to the fluting.

>>10833510
I'm lost on this. I thought it was a thing with a shitposting thing.
But I think you're actually referring to me.

First I heard of Ken was a Optimum thread a while back.
I thought is was just as part of that sporadic shitpost spree me and another had.

And all the other times he's mention. It's not as in my hand so to speak.
I've not been exposed more to anything other that a few turns of phrases.
Come to think of it. I may be fucked on usage of dielectric.
But I've been using the word wrong?
It just seemed connotative to a 2 sate-ism.

But truth be told I was steered to magnet's via rethink it gave cause for.
Was shitposted at in the big Optimum thread about it while I talking about fields.
I thought I was being put on
Coaxial circuits being all fields?
So I shitposted a light bulb analogy.
.
Only thing other I see of Kens shit is that ??? image of a magnet.
Some how it's exhibiting both flows?

Well I'm struggling to see core parallels here.
My bits as directions with drag.

>>10831762
>hecked, magnetism has an effect on every single material in existence.
what are its effects on piece of paper?

>>10836092
In my versioning. It's relative to total composition.
It will alwas have some action. Like gravity and atomic parts.
But as for /metal.l magnetism. It depends on how fast they are relative to each other.

Look up magnetic brakes. It's a non ferrous iteration.
It;s the fields passing each other causing nonferrous partials to action.
That imparts drag. So it;s not that magnets either work or don't.
It's a conditional force.

Being I'm stipulating all matter is of this thing.
This would mean that it's intersections of patterns emitted.
Those are what causes any thing to have effect.

You can see to the 'end' of the universe.
This is a lot of space.
So it it easily possible that you can have a incredible amount of room in the micro.
So a if existent on the same scale.
You can have many field cross sections exist, with likely hood to impart action.
Or unlikely action. As they are far apart in field pressure spikes.
To be like a photon passing a between galaxy clusters.


I feel like a deserve a cookie for explaining this.
But I'm so abused here I don't know if I even.

>>10836181
>It will alwas have some action. Like gravity and atomic parts.
so you agree with the other poster?
Didn't answer my question though. Everyone knows two objects have an effect on each other due to gravity. What he was saying is that magnetism is an effect between atoms in certain materials not all. Gravity is an effect in all materials.
Also I'm assuming English isn't your first language.

>>10836199
No. I thought it was a simplicity error in why it was asked
It's hard to determine a why inspecificism question.
I should have backtracked the covo.
>english
Oh you you dan't want to know my bias for it.
>magnetism is an effect between atoms in certain materials not all. Gravity is an effect in all materials.
It's a matter of chance.
When it's all the same stuff.there's more then likely interaction to happen.
A photon passing thought galactic voids still has chance to hit something.
And not even directly the magnetic force we assume on our level.

There's all the chance a neutrino from the other side of the observable universe.
Has a pressure point over here even if ever so impossibly feint.
It chances interaction with a magnetic field over here at one of it's own pressure points.
And this tips it just over the threshold, that it either acts upon the magnetic field into the magnetic force.
Or, if the magnetic pressure point was aligned with a magnetizing other it wasn't intending act on because either range or state vale.
I becomes tipped into acting.

As for the differentials. It's a direct value of Halbach arrays.
These arrays are arrangements of magnets, that caused poles to split unevenly.
This drops field down closer to the array if more split.
These are variable in arrangement. both as a common output field value and unequal value across a side.

Hope I got that.

>>10836199
Oh have you meant you cant take the logic step, that these arrays are each partial too?
The skin of it?
And quarks and all the other bits and bobs. until you can't determine new matter?
There's no different thing just arrangements of them causing chance.
But with also predictable chance in meshing fields.