[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 42 KB, 892x1355, pythag proof.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10623478 No.10623478 [Reply] [Original]

Is the Pythagorean Theorem the most beautiful theorem of all?

>> No.10623846

>>10623478
Everything happening in reality is beautiful anon.

>> No.10623849

Absolute shit, and the author is probably homosexual

>> No.10624142
File: 9 KB, 333x151, RearrangementProof.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10624142

>>10623478
You're right OP.

>> No.10625254
File: 67 KB, 1024x962, a38.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10625254

>>10623846
even me?

>> No.10625262

>>10625254
especially you :)

>> No.10625269
File: 32 KB, 1600x1000, euler-identity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10625269

>>10623478
nah

>> No.10625276
File: 15 KB, 400x266, eipi10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10625276

>>10625269
reddit tier

>> No.10625304

>>10625254
you most of all

>> No.10625338

I quite like that
[math]\oint_{c}f(z)\ \text{d}z=0[/math]
Green's theorem is nice too.
[math]\oint_{\partial R}P\ \text{d}x+Q\ \text{d}y=\iint_R\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\ \text{d}A[/math]
>>10625269
>>10625276
>not writing the full identity
[math]\exp(j\theta)=\cos\theta+j\sin\theta[/math]

>> No.10625366

oh god no, now the fucking euler brainlets will come post their braindead formula

>> No.10625367

>>10625338
>exp
>j

Found the engineer

>> No.10625371

>>10625269
>if you turn 180 degrees you'll be facing the opposite way

Ooo! Ahh! So deep and profound!

>> No.10625375

>>10625371
>degrees
>opposite way

>> No.10625381

>>10625371
lol if you turned 180 degrees you'd be facing the same way idiot

>> No.10625383

>>10623478
Poincare’s better.

It’s the Pythagorean of the 21st century.

Thank god for mr Russia guy being so dedicated to it. I miss him. I guess he’s still alive? I want to hug him and am crying right now.

>> No.10626570

>>10625276
Oh, God. I know him (or someone who looks a lot like him and has the exact same tattoo in the exact same spot).

>> No.10626629

>>10623478
The early proof that A=pi r^2 given that O = 2 pi r is more elegant.

>> No.10626633

>>10625367
>hating superior notation

>> No.10627970

>>10625383
I'm crying too anon (or I wish I was for a lil bit)

>> No.10627984

>>10623478
geometry is gay and ugly
its just obtuse shit that algebra couldnt even save

>> No.10628002

>>10627984
>its just obtuse shit
wrong
geometry a cute

>> No.10628014

>>10623478
No, it's extension in higher dimensions is.

(Try to figure it out for n=3, then n=4 before looking it up.)

>> No.10628024

>>10623478
You can’t prove two lines are perpendicular.

>> No.10628070

>>10628024
wa wa wee wuh

>> No.10628499

Most elegant is fundamental thm of Galois thy

>> No.10628549

>>10625381
What a fucking brainlet

>> No.10628558

Why do people write 1.0x10^n when 1.0En is easier to read (unless typeset), write, and less error prone?

>> No.10628634
File: 6 KB, 225x130, point 9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10628634

>> No.10628884
File: 1.14 MB, 1920x1080, 1548968872622.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10628884

>>10625269
>>10625276
>>10625338
>>10625371
>whoa, [math]\operatorname{cis}{\left(x\right)} = \exp{\left(ix\right)}[/math] satisfies [math]\operatorname{cis}' = i\cdot\operatorname{cis}[/math], [math]\operatorname{cis}'' = -\operatorname{cis}[/math], and [math] \operatorname{cis}{\left(0\right)} = 1[/math], so deep, such beauty, God exists
Christ. I'll suck Euler's dick all day, but I can't take seriously anyone who thinks something so mundane, especially something as Frankensteined together as that equation, is "beautiful".

>> No.10629626

>>10626633
I don't think anything that's dumbed down to be digestible to Engineer monkeys could be considered superior

>> No.10629641

>>10628884
I don't see how the pythagorean theorem or cauchy inequality or traingle inequality are any less "mundane" that euler's formula. shit bait.

>> No.10629748
File: 44 KB, 1280x659, pythagoras.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10629748

>>10623478

>> No.10630116

>>10623478
I'd go for the fundamental theorem of arithmetic

>> No.10630597

>>10629641
They're literally not, but nobody says the Pythagorean Theorem is profound. Shit bait.

>> No.10630788

>>10630597
so whats a profound theorem?

>> No.10630795

>>10630788
Stokes

>> No.10630813

>>10630795
How arbitrary

>> No.10631499

>>10630788
No such thing. Every theorem is a tautology.

>> No.10631588

>>10623478
someone explain to me the first step of the algebra here?

>> No.10631610

>>10628634
That's surprisingly controversial on this board.

>> No.10631617

>>10631588

It's a joke. The diagram is meant to approximate the happy merchant, a /pol/ meme. This is why the "k" (for kike) is mysteriously introduced.