/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10232250
Lax for Fun Anal.
Anything for Real Anal.
Lipman Bers for Complex Anal.
Optimization and PDEs can go fuck themselves.

>>10232250

You'll never learn. Sexual is opposed to intellect.

>>10232268
I'm actually into applied math, the analysis is just necessary for beefing up my math ability- undergraduate level analysis/ measure theory turned out to be useful in that regard. I have yet to steer it in an engineering/compsci/finance direction, but that shouldn't take more than a few certs.

>>10232250
>Functional Analysis
Brezis
>Real/Complex Analysis
Rudin

>>10232250
>wearing a bra with that dress

Idiot, OP.

>>10232250
>Functional
Brezis is an absolute joy to read. He has solutions to problems if you're into that. However, it doesn't go as deep as something like Reed and Simon or Lax. I've also heard good things about Conway. Brezis focuses more (especially the second half) on applications to PDEs. If you want a very comprehensive tome, look at よしだ.

>Complex
Ahlfors is the classic text for this, but I dislike his style. He often hides definitions and proofs inside text, so it can be a pain to locate things.
I would suggest Stein and Shikarchi or Conway. Rudin has a somewhat odd presentation of complex analysis, but I enjoy it.

>Real
Folland is my favorite text for real analysis. Rudin is great as well. I'd look for something that speeds through measure theory as most people effectively use it as a black box. Most measure theoretic arguments aren't that useful in PDEs or numerical analysis. I like to refer to the construction of Lebesgue measure as something you see once and then never again (unless you teach it). You should avoid something that does not treat measures in the abstract setting first as it's a waste of time otherwise.

(For functional, real, and complex, some good online notes can be found on Paul Garrett's webpage http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~garrett/ )

I'm not a numerical analyst, so I can't say much for your last two requests. My officemate does finite element methods, and he swears upon Atkin as a great introduction to numerical analysis through a functional analysis perspective. The book covers the functional analysis necessary as well.

>>10232250
is that a boy
asking for a friend

is Kreyszig any good for functional analysis? its in my courses recommended reading and i see it rec'd everywhere

>>10232616
its pretty elementary but highly readible

>>10232602
Swears upon Atkinson*.

anyone know about or recommend evans? He's used in my school for PDEs and such.

>>10232250
>Real/Complex Analysis
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Mathematics#Complex_Analysis
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Mathematics#Graduate_Real_Analysis
>Functional Analysis
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Mathematics#Functional_Analysis
>Optimization
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering#Advanced_Algorithms_and_Mathematical_Optimization
>Numerical Methods for PDEs
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering#Numerical_Partial_Differential_Equations

>>10232783
It's the standard textbook.

What's the verdict on this book? the wiki says it's overpriced

>>10233271
I used this book for one of my linear algebra courses though it mainly involved ch. 7 - 10. Chapter 9/10 are an online extension of the book covering game theory and finite markov chains, respectively.

>>10232478
maybe her tits look bad without it

>>10232268
Gay

>>10232478
Most women without implants need it to not look flat.

>>10232785
>http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering#Advanced_Algorithms_and_Mathematical_Optimization
These ones suck for anyone outside of applied CS. Extremely limited in scope.

>>10233283
do you have links for ch 9 and 10?

>>10233482
What kind of Optimization are you looking for?

>>10233505
I'm not the OP, but an introduction to optimization should contain an overview of the whole field, not just discrete/combinatorial and convex.

These are the most relevant to CS because the algorithmic complexity is well defined.

>>10233483
It’s on TPB

Anyone get any recommendations for lowel level maths? I want to review up to algerba and learn up to calculus.

just donwload a bunch and solve the problems, no need to follow strictly only one book

ignore every other advice that was given here, they are all retarded autists with no achievements

>>10233479
i'd rather they just look flat, it's cuter

>>10235277
It's good to have a primary textbook though. Plus I want to order a print copy so I don't have browse the internets only to get distracted by porn or shitposting.

>>10235470

>>10232250
How much do I have to pay for an hour with this woman?

>>10236787

Liking flat boobs ≠ Liking Lolis
Liking flat boobs ≠ Liking Males

>>10236820
>denial
what was the next stage?

bump

>>10236820
Agree.

>>10236820
It does whether you recognize it or not. Your intention has nothing to do with the biological or social processes underlying your behavior. If more people realized this they would understand why people seem, and are, so cruel to one another.

>>10232301
I can't think if I haven't taken the sexual tension off me.

>>10232268
>Not liking optimization and PDEs
You must be bitter that your research is never funded

>>10238306
>tfw no money to fuck bitches and access paywalled papers with

>>10232250
Braess is good for finite element. I've been reading Brezis for a nice intro to functional analysis that leads into applications to PDEs. What sorta work are you planning on doing?

>>10232301
Fuck off to reddit.