/sci/ - Science & Math

underage b@n

Boltzmann distribution comes pretty close

>>10202018
Nah

yeah I had it written down somewhere let me see if I can find it hold up

>>10202018
The simple arithmetic equation.

Define any problem as "the roots to a 2nd degree polynomial function."
Apply OP's pic related.

[math] e + i + \pi = -1[/math]

horseshoe mathematics seems pretty close

Here you go OP

>>10202102
can this formula tell me whether or not traps are gay?

>>10202018
No finite equation.
Let's say you have an equation with n independent variable. You can always have a system with n+x independent variables.

>>10202102
What the fuck...

>>10202081
hurr most beautiful equation hurr

>>10202102
>tfw this equation still can't solve a point particle falling to the ground

>>10202018
t = tg(x/2)

>>10202018
No. Not only that, but any finite list of axioms that aren't contradictory are necessarily incomplete.

>>10202102
Wow, the universe is so elegant

>>10202081
e^i

x+1=2

>>10202338
This was the most effective explanation I've ever heard, but maybe that's just because of where I 'am' right now

1=1 multiply and add everything you want both sides

>>10202339
Obviously they ran its physical laws through a code obfuscator before they released it, to make it harder to break the copy protection

>>10202081
um no

>>10202567
>t. brainlet

>>10202570
seriously explain it
a complex number has the form a +bi.
both i and pi are elements of real numbers while i is a element of complex numbers
two real numbers added together will never make a complex number.
real number + complex number /= real number
a = pi + e, b = i
pi + e + 1*i /= -1

>>10202564
>t. brainlet

>>10202577
You said bs that was BTFO hundreds of years ago, so I'll say it again
>t. brainlet

>>10202586
Lol mixing up your threads. Just more evidence that you are a >brainlet

>>10202589
>t. brainlet

>>10202586

>>10202602
>t. brainlet

>>10202602
It's a little known result in complex analysis that i = -6.85987448

>>10202600
You literally thought >>10202577 was me and tried to use what i said in the other thread "against" me
absolute moron lmao
>t. brianlet

>>10202611
>t. brainlet

>>10202619
>t. brainlet

>>10202611
>>10202619
>>10202609
>>10202610
>t. brainlet

>>10202622
>>10202624
>t. brainlet

>>10202570
>>10202585
>>10202586
>>10202600
>>10202609
>>10202611
>>10202619
>>10202622
>>10202624
STOP

you're all fucking brainlets
I bet you all study med and pretend to know maths

>>10202632
>t. brainlet

>>10202635
let's fucking go then
https://lichess.org/89dBTot4

>>10202629
>t. brainlet

>>10202018
>pic related

>>10202018
0.9999... = 1

>>10202646
That's not math

>>10202641
https://lichess.org/MreqhQku

>>10202663
>That's not math

>>10202688
>t. brainlet

>>10202688
Why do I get the impression this board has exactly one wojak poster?
You, did you ever see a wojak here that you didn't post?

neural networks are "Universal Function Approximators", so in a way they can solve any problem theoretically.

>>10202121
The answer is invariably yes, this is not a problem

>>10202018
Viola
x = ans

>>10202102
what a retarded piece of hodge podge garbage
that thing cant solve shit

you cant use numbers to explain it (yet) but here it is (the general algorythm)

solution to problem = use_logic(problem paramaters, desired information, calculation fidelity)

CS fags without strong math skills are literally the worst kind of brainlet

>>10202018
Is there an Original Poster who can suck all the cocks?

>>10202018
a = b
Just plug in the appropriate a for your problem

>>10202018
Not an equation, but this comes closest to what you're looking for

>>10203308
>can't solve the continuum hypothesis
lmao

>>10202102
i can see clearly now, the rain is gone

>>10203308
well theres a load of DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH with a little DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOY sprinkled on it

>>10203324
I'm sorry it doesn't massage your back too, but it's still some good shit

>>10202018
1+1+1+1+1 etc

>>10202018
>He hasn't heard of universal function approximators
theoretically yes...in practice, maybe

>>10202018
no, the halting problem is a thing.

((p·q)·r)·(p·((p·r)·p))==r

Ur welcom OP

>>10202018
[math]f(x)=0[/math]

>>10202490
only true answer itt

>>10202102
Top Kek