/sci/ - Science & Math

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb0EI_rCzT4
19 hours remain

>>14598140

The 1-minute deep breath of SN10

>>11379582

My first subject was on reviewing literature in 1100-1300 C.E. medicine and it's relevant application to real world physical assessments.

2nd subject was on some bullshit feminist propaganda we read in class about how men oppress women in the patriarchy, steal their glory and ideas while they continue to gain more notoriety. This subject was unique to me and I only completed it because people were telling me to "just play the game."

Also my writing isn't perfect I'll admit, but it's better than most others in my cohort. Spending 10h on a paper with no measurable mistakes suggests that as well. Their marking is entirely subjective and at no point is there a correction on: formatting, grammar, sentence structure, or flow.

>>11379575
I'll give you a quick list of the frequent words she uses to mark unfairly:
>word choice??????
>evidence?
>oh really? (while highlighting text)
>This isnt enough!
>how so? (underlining text)
>you must cite sources in intro paragraph
>wordchoice?
> W O R D C H O I C E ? ? ? ?
>Orient your reader!