/sci/ - Science & Math

>no audio
>literally a black curtain surrounding a car and cardboard cutout of a """spherical""" Earth
Who do they think they're fooling?

>>8872723
>0 means woman

>>8820206
>Chemistry
>Biology
>memorization


Once again, mathfag ignores the fact that humans are more than just brains floating in the ether. You're wrong, dolt. Biology and chemistry involve DOING THINGS in the REAL WORLD, not flipping around numbers in your head and calling it "research" or whatever. If you mathematicians are so smart, how come you spend your days scribbling Greek letters on a chalk board instead of extending lives and making billions of dollars by curing cancer or Alzheimer's. The truly intelligent people are those who can devise models with accurate predictive power, based on empirical observations of the natural world. Mathematics is simply a tool to be used by real scientists in order to model the real world which makes mathematicians little more than hammer-makers.


Here's the ACTUAL list in terms of difficulty:

1a. Particle Physicists. Creating a mathematical model that describes the elements of the universe has always been the ultimate goal for natural philosophers.

1b. Neuroscientists. Understanding how macromolecules can be arranged so as to create consciousness is the other question of the universe.

2a. Computer scientists and programmers.
2b. Molecular biology and chemistry.
All of these people have to create models and devise experiments to test their models in order to learn more about whatever system they are studying.

10000. Mathematicians.
Bottom of the barrel, hardly even qualify as scientists. A bunch of oafs who would probably poison or maim themselves if placed in an actual laboratory. Confined to computer labs and desks where they can study things that no one cares about without hurting themselves or anyone else.

>>8818431
>tenth year of grad school

well, at least you took the hint

>>8808939
>"we're gonna talk about this for like two minutes, okay?"

>>8800966
>not a lot of resources for learning about cancer

There is a journal for just about every type of cancer that we know about.

> use some molecular

>>8775144

> We all know that climate change is happening.
> Which is why we have six million different climate models

>>8767020
>using university admission as a proxy for a measure of intelligence

>>8744220
>There would just be a quantum wave function that would precisely describe the path taken by any molecule in any environment.

But people don't describe living organisms in terms wave functions because that would be absurd. The lowest-level that we describe organisms at is the level of the molecule.

>>8744182
He is arguing that DNA is predisposed to generate certain organisms (in particular, man), because this is an inherent property of DNA, and that DNA will only make these particular life forms. Even if it were physically possible for DNA to evolve itself into a more fit lifeforms, he argues, DNA might have some sort of "will" in that it refuses these mutations because it "wants" to be some other ideal form that it perhaps not the most "fit" that it could be. Or something like that.

Regardless, even if DNA has its own mysterious free will, if the environment kills off the things that can't live in the environment, then the will of the DNA will be at least guided by nature into one particular path of evolution.

>>8733500
>with no contracts

>>8730990
If there are no limits, then how do you explain continuity?

>high crash rates are ok because we have airbags

>is a tautology

>>8068042
>SuperDracos
>proven

>dark energy

>be me
>be 17
>have a shitty math teacher
>study a worthless math book
>almost failin math

>>6328907
>>6328908
>>6328918
>>6329208
Oh look

/lit/ here

Sci seems to still circle-jerk that Philosophy isn't a Science

>>5550327

>f(x) = sin(x), no limit