/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15674083

>Mid-September

There should be just a rule that anybody who makes *predictions that fail to occur should be stoned. Like, literally throwing rocks at them until they die. I know it won't stop you guys just making shit up and falling for made-up shit, but it would at least give the illusion of consequence and provide some satisfaction.
Because you guys have been doing this shit for 3 fucking years now and it's just your Climate Change. It's your global warming. You're already living in pods, you're already eating bugs, because somebody *else* told you it was the meta to avoiding covid vaccines or whatever.

*Granted, I understand we'd run out of Climate Scientists and Economists within maybe a year, maybe less, but even then it'd be interesting to see that race to the bottom play out.

Its finally happening

Aren't the vaxxies supposed to be dead by now? What happened?

>>15410089
No, elaborate on your point. You schizos go on and on about how the vaccinated have made some grave mistake and that they will all suffer for it, so the least you can do is defend your stance. We've been waiting like 2 years now, when will the vaxxed start dropping like flies and face these terrible repercussions from getting the jab?
>>15410098
I dont know what you're talking about, I was never against the vaccine

>>15402253
Yeah bro /pol/ users are so intelligent