/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12748326
>Should we be worried, then, that the NASA OIG continues to report that the MSFC software team can’t get their act together and that the SLS still doesn’t have either a complete flight software stack or any kind of integrated test environment?
Holy fuck I forgot about this. Artemis I is a ticking bomb.

>>12741196
Oof that hairline

>>12703755
I just got dumped today bro’s. Anyone got any good spaceflight shit to read about/watch?

>27.3% satellites orbiting earth are of SpaceX starlink's mission and still only launched 946 satellites. The plan is to send 40,000 satellites.

Oh no.
The insides of the core stage looks like it came directly from the year 2003

uhhh... is there a particular reason as to why Virgin Galactic stock is up 20% today?

>>12490272
What a wonderful person.
Someone ask her what she thinks of Marx.

>>12450833
I feel like SpaceX is taking Super Heavy development for granted. Like building a giant booster will ever be easy. Makes me think something will go wrong.

>>12350263
UDMH isn't the worse idea in the world compared to the fucking CIF3