[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12455216 [View]
File: 425 KB, 2460x1340, M&M,R2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12455216

>>12454519
>>12454540
>Sets A_i, element j of A_i is a_ij. Define a map by f(a_ij)=(2^i)*(3^j).
If you read "countable" in the "enumerable" direction A->N, with powers of 2 and 3 (an answer exactly like this is also on the SE thread of the topic) instead of N->A, it might even get a tad more difficult than in the other direction. I think, not sure, that with A in the domain, it might raise questions like whether the procedure being given a [math]a_{ij}[/math] in the union of all [math]A_i[/math]'s automatically means we know which [math]A_i[/math] that [math]a_{ij}[/math] is from.
In any case, almost everybody will take their functions apriori be packed with so much information that the choice involved in the N->A proof goes through.

That said, here's a nice rant against is

http://math.fau.edu/Richman/docs/venice.pdf

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]