/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10727468
again, "iq" itself has serious issues.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/538431/deep-learning-machine-beats-humans-in-iq-test/
https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07909
in this research, a neural network trained on word embeddings (this is a hot topic in natural language processing) is able to compete with humans on a verbal iq test.

https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/articles/2017/01/making-ai-systems-see-the-world-as-humans-do.html
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-60724-002
here, a convolutional neural network (typically used for image processing) scores in the 75th percentile on a raven's progressive matrices visual iq test.

should personal computers be afforded greater access to society than actual human beings, since any of them can be loaded with these python or lisp scripts and then made to pass an iq test?

clearly, the iq metric is not a sufficient basis for discrimination in human societies.

>At what point does it become acceptable to segregate society?
good question. my guess would be never, at least not on broad racial lines. but first you have to figure out: what exactly is the standard for integration in society?

>>10493923
>>10492280
>>10493917
yes, when will we finally cull the unworthy?