[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9421114 [View]
File: 409 KB, 1157x772, HAHAHAHHAHA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9421114

>>9421103
>good woman
oh to be young again

>> No.8456199 [View]
File: 409 KB, 1157x772, 1464730113262.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8456199

>>8452892

>I don't know much about Leibeniz

Newton wins again

>> No.8012974 [View]
File: 409 KB, 1157x772, 1460543783656.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8012974

>>8012941
>I tend to consider division in OP's case as multiplication of fractions

[math]4*\frac{3}{2}[/math]

>Woah I must have divided 4 by 3 halves because 3 halves is a fraction!
You mean multiplication of the inverse, right?
In which case, you're still wrong:

Let [math]a \circ b = a * \frac{1}{b}=a * b^{-1}[/math]

[math]a\circ(b\circ c)[/math]
[math]=a\circ(b*\frac{1}{c})[/math]
[math]=a\circ(\frac{b}{c})[/math]
[math]=a*(\frac{c}{b})[/math]
[math]=\frac{ac}{b}[/math]

[math](a\circ b)\circ c[/math]
[math]=(a*\frac{1}{b})\circ c[/math]
[math]=(\frac{a}{b})\circ c[/math]
[math]=(\frac{a}{b})*(\frac{1}{c})[/math]
[math]=\frac{a}{cb}[/math]

(LaTeX might be fucked, don't often do it)

>>8012950
Still not commutative.

>> No.8001056 [View]
File: 409 KB, 1157x772, 1445255970531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8001056

>>7995364

>don't insult computer science. look at what you're sitting in front of.

Yeah, nah. I think I'll thank the electrical engineers for that.

As for this site, I'll thank the 15 year old who copy pasted the code onto a server. That's pretty much all computer science is

>>7995379

>The actual math and concept behind a computer is fucking complex as shit
>complex as shit
>discrete """"""""""math""""""""""
>complex as shit

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]