[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14869849 [View]
File: 16 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14869849

>>14863333
These race scientists get some things right but some things very wrong.
They're right about the fact that people like myself (pic related) will never have what it takes to advance science for some reason.

But they're dead wrong about the utility of the SAT, GRE. Despite being a dumbshit I can just walk in with zero prep and get top scores. In the end, the scores don't matter; I'm still just a nignog, and I will never finish my PhD.

First thing's first, if you really want to contribute in science or math, the #1 most important thing is to be a conscientious, hard worker who finishes what he starts.

Second, there is a deeper quality to thought that can't be inferred by hamfisted measures like the breadth of your vocabulary, high school math problems with a tiny bit of reasoning mixed in, or pattern recognition matrices.

These tests only measure how adept you are at shallow thinking, i.e. how quick can you answer these questions?

They don't measure your ability to dig deep into the heart of a complex problem over the course of weeks, to keep your thoughts organized while you gather insight, and then articulate an elegant proof that others can learn from.

There's plenty of people at my uni that I outscored on the GRE, and they can do these things. I can't. Standardized tests are a meme.

>>14869834
I never thought I was "hot shit", trust me. I didn't ask the test to give me a good score, and would never have taken it if they didn't force me.

>> No.14572696 [View]
File: 16 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14572696

>>14572650
>tfw 9x6 bbc
>tfw incel
don't worry about it OP, more important is the question of whether or not anyone will ever see it

>> No.11762631 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11762631

>>11762576
I got a 143 on this test. Pic related: my ethnicity.

What's more likely?
a) I'm 3SD above the average black IQ of 85
b) Online IQ tests dramatically overestimate IQ

(a) has a probability of <0.0001% by the way

>> No.11158433 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11158433

>>11158039
>How do you deal with the racism
by not being a snowflake.
the racism on 4chan is actually refreshing because it's overt and unabashed.
real-world racism is much harder to deal with, because the perpetrators, some of whom have actual power over your life, often act where they can't be seen and always have plausible deniability ready. hence why suburbanite and rural whites can treat patterns of racial prejudice as if they're paranormal activity or UFO sightings.

>> No.11158413 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11158413

>>11158039
>How do you deal with the racism
by not being a snowflake.
the racism on 4chan is actually refreshing because it's overt and unabashed.
real-world racism, which is much harder to deal with because the perpetrators, some of whom have actual power over your life, often act where they can't be seen, and always have plausible deniability. hence why suburbanite and rural whites treat patterns of racial prejudice as if they're paranormal activity or UFO sightings.

>> No.10871629 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10871629

>>10869384
Most likely these tests are inaccurate.

Pic related is my ethnicity. According to the first-rate work of science known as "The Bell Curve," my average group IQ is 85, but I scored a whopping 143. This puts me 4SD above my racial average (i.e. the top 0.006%) and even 3SD above the white average (smarter than 99.7% of whites).

We can therefore conclude it's far more likely that those tests have a lot of error than that I'm some kind of elite genius.

>> No.10537198 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10537198

>>10534412
meme test
i got a 143 on it, pic related my ethnicity.
average black iq is scientifically proven to be 85, so which is more likely?
(1) i'm a 4sd outlier
(2) the test is a meme
chance of (1) is <0.0001%, so i'm gonna go with (2)

>> No.10520242 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520242

>>10518233
test.mensa.no is invalid, i'm black (pic related) and i got 143, the chance that the test is invalid is far higher than the chance that i'm a 4SD outlier from the 85 average iq of a black.
i'll get back to you after i take the other one.

>> No.10499810 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10499810

>>10497091
>>10499775
>>10498767
>>10498614
>>10497948
this test is inaccurate. i scored 143. pic related: my ethnicity.
the likelihood that the test is inaccurate is higher than the chance that i'm actually a 3SD outlier from the rest of my race (avg IQ: 85).

>> No.10441700 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10441700

>>10441279
30/30.
Not a valid IQ test and a waste of time.
Intelligence is mostly heritable, so someone with my genetic background should score probably a 15 at best. Either I am a 0.0001% outlier or this test is not a valid IQ test. The latter is far more likely.

>> No.10355529 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10355529

>>10355506
>>10353257
>>10353232
>>10353149
>>10354902
>high IQ
This can't be right. Pic related is my ethnicity, based on DNA.
I got 166V/170Q, which is 97th and 94th percentile, respectively, and corresponds to an IQ of 141 +/- 5.
However, the average IQ of people with my ethnicity is 85. This means I would be a 3SD outlier if GRE score could be mapped to IQ.
3SD is by definition extremely unlikely. Thus, we should instead question whether the GRE properly measures intelligence.

>> No.10281351 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, 143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10281351

>>10278632
test is probably deeply flawed
pic related is my ancestry, but i scored a 143 on this test.
based on the widely-accepted average of 85 it's far more likely that the test has given invalid results than that I'm actually 3SD above the average negroid.
this is of course assuming that the specific "average" that I should compare myself to is that of sub-saharan Africans, which imo makes sense since I do have the negro skin color / face structure phenotype

>> No.10164425 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164425

>>10164226
anyone can understand combinatorics m8 it just takes some work.
the key is to keep working problems and thinking about it and your intuition will develop.
my favorite strategy is to study the problem that's giving me trouble until I go to sleep. preferably I fall asleep while still thinking deeply about it. typically I'll have a "eureka" moment the next morning while in the shower or sitting in my car stuck in traffic on the way to school.
and before you say "you just have a high IQ" pic related is my ethnicity. so if I can get it anyone can get it

>>10164285
it's possible he was fucking with you. i say that kind of shit all the time. the more obtuse i find it, the easier i say it is.
kinda like ronnie coleman calling 900lbs a "peanut"

>> No.10128185 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10128185

>>10118422
>IQ 143
I don't know, do you trust it?

>> No.10104443 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10104443

>>10100499
720 math, 720 verbal (97th percentile) with absolutely zero study time
My sister got 720 math, 800 verbal (99th percentile), she put in some study for the math section
It's an easy fucking test, even for us blacks, if you can't score at least 1200 you're just retarded.

>> No.10101882 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10101882

>>10101829
>the person only got the job because...
feels bad man
4.0 gpa 99th percentile gre, got accepted to phd program, have a white guy suggest to my face that i only got the position because of race when in fact i outscored him

>> No.10085960 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10085960

>>10085943
guess that means my online 143 is accurate? i was certain it had to be a mistake

>> No.10078484 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, pure_black_blood_tainted_by_white_rapists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10078484

>>10078180
>tfw i got 1530 on the sat
damn
what a waste. i could have got the same results with a 1220?

>> No.10046259 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, iq143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10046259

>>10045129
>Racism and sexism don't exist
Don't be retarded, obviously they exist. Making a prediction about someone based on race is "racism" by definition.
The question is whether or not racism is a correct and smart attitude to have.
For example, I don't ever let a white person or a woman cut my hair. It's a racist and sexist attitude, pure and simple, but I stand by it because 90% of the time I don't stick to that rule I get my hair butchered. It's not that they can't learn how to do it, but for whatever reason, they don't (perhaps on purpose, to keep the niggers away?), so I have no choice.
Of course this is different from disenfranchising millions of people or denying them access to schools and jobs but the logic is mostly the same

>> No.9823587 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, specific.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9823587

>>9823483
97th percentile 720 math 720 verbal

>> No.9769299 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, specific.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9769299

>>9769238
https://medium.com/@dl1dl1/can-we-predict-intelligence-from-genetic-data-9ab5e5b57d41

>What we found was quite striking. Most individuals received a score of around zero. This means that for most people, these SNPs did not influence their intelligence in any particular direction! In fact, no individual receives a difference of more than 5 IQ points!
>For those of you who got a negative score—this doesn’t mean you are not intelligent. Case in point: Dr. Yaniv Erlich, accomplished geneticist, Columbia University Professor, and creator of DNA.Land, has a negative score:
On top of all that he's Ashkenazi Jew, which is correlated with the highest IQs in the world according to prominent race scientists.
Yet he has a negative score. As they said, it only means anything if you're western european (where they got the data from), and it's of minimal significance.
Sorry to rain on OP's parade though.

>> No.9760338 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, specific.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9760338

>>9760292
tops add up to 11 row and column wise
bottoms add up to 5 row and column wise
1 on the top, 3 on the bottom
saged for being so easy a nigger could spot it instantly

>> No.9746043 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, specific.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9746043

>>9745338
>a quota of 70% white isn't wide enough
>he needs a 100% white quota in order to scrape through as a bottom 1% brainlet
kys faggot you got rejected because you're retarded.

>> No.9743550 [View]
File: 17 KB, 542x457, specific.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9743550

I got 166/164 on GRE and a 3.97 GPA , I have one workshop paper and one transaction, I got accepted into a top 5 grad school
Was it AA?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]