[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9727452 [View]
File: 1.24 MB, 1282x670, warp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9727452

>>9727383
Notice how the horizon changes shape as the camera moves around? Curved windows + curved lens, or possibly green screen.

>> No.9710641 [View]
File: 1.24 MB, 1282x670, 1525112835002[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9710641

>>9710633
I've watched all of it you lil' space bitch. It's the same clips over and over again, with manipulation on display.

>> No.9706622 [View]
File: 1.24 MB, 1282x670, warp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9706622

>> No.9354903 [View]
File: 1.24 MB, 1282x670, warp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9354903

>>9354590

>Not an argument. I pointed out that you were (hypocritically) basing your views on secondhand information (or no evidence at all, in places) and your response was to repeat those views. Truth by repetition isn't a thing.

I fail to see how that's an equal comparison. An opinion about acquiring a PhD doesn't require scientific evidence. Science is about trying to find the opposite of opinion using the scientific method, which theoretical science doesn't do.

>Limits of ability to do actual work, you pathetic NEET. It takes actual effort to put together a functional methodology and actually do the legwork, to say nothing of the analysis that follows.

It takes a lot of effort swimming in other people's bullshit, as well as creating you're own. I'm not saying people are doing this deliberately, it's just they have no other option.

>I'm an invertebrate paleontologist. I experience my specimens firsthand. The trouble with just making shit up is that it's painfully obvious to the people who actually do research that you're, well, just making shit up.

You experience a physical object first hand, but beyond that it's just using other people's ideas to analyse such things.

>Name a single equation that violates the scientific method.

All of them because they're not physical objects.

>I Don't Understand Basic Geometry: The Post

Not an argument.

>Because the ISS orbits the earth at a height of 254 miles or so. If you do the math (again, this is 8th/9th grade geometry) you find that the Earth spans ~140° from the ISS. To view that, you'd need a super-wide-angle fisheye lens, which would introduce a lot of distortion and make the image look like shit.
>Oh wait, I just used a mathematical equation. That's anti-science, right? :^)

Funny you mention fish eyed lens, pic attached shows deliberate warping to make the earth appear more curved/spherical.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]