[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9751126 [View]
File: 42 KB, 669x773, bq9euhkfc6y01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9751126

>>9750792
How exactly is the atmosphere attached to the surface of the planet? and how does it not leak out into space?
How does spinning a bucket compare to a spinning globe, where instead of the water being inside the enclosed shape(leaving only the opening pointing 'up") its on the outer surface of a round ball? Not a good comparison.

What I mean by curvature sorry, is what is the expected drop below the horizon over a particular distance. All the numbers provided by globe science DO NOT work, where you can see objects and buildings that should be hidden by hundreds of feet of curvature. I believe the longest photo capture was over 200 miles but i'll have to double check.

If there are plenty then it should be easy to give me a couple real world examples of mass attracting mass, don't dance around.

Look up Boyd Bushman On The Hutchison Effect in regards to the magnestism thing, i'm just a layman.

It can and HAS happened. Do research. It is explained away as atmospheric refraction but this is another globe-lie. There have been several recorded all through history, even in the last 5 years.

Listen I know exactly how you feel I believed in NONE of this about 1 year ago, I infact argued the same points you did because i never actually allowed myself to even ponder what flat earth people were saying. There are laser light tests showing no curvature over distances 10-20miles where there should be a considerable dip but there isn't. Look up ships going over the horizon, then being brought back into sight with a more powerful zoom. Things simply don't add up. >>9750807

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]