/sci/ - Science & Math

Walk to the rover cam and just talk with fellow tankwatchers. They won't bite.

https://www.unep.org/unep-50-leaders-through-years/maurice-strong

>Maurice Strong played a unique and critical role in globalizing the environmental movement. He led the historic United Nations Conference on the Human Environment
>it resulted in the founding of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
>Six months later, he was elected by the UN General Assembly to become UNEP’s first Executive Director
>In June 1992, he led another landmark meeting: the UN Conference on Environment and Development
>The conference addressed climate change and underscored the right to sustainable development

>Mr. Strong’s other notable appointments included:
>Under-Secretary-General and Special Advisor to the UN Secretary-General,
>Senior Advisor to the President of the World Bank
>Foundation Board member of the World Economic Forum
>He also had an expansive career in the private sector, where he led some of Canada’s most prestigious energy companies.

According to the UN green shill department, greentard ideology was established and globalized by a literal oil executive/bankster/WEF founder. What gives?

"IQ"/"g"/"general intelligence" is one of the crudest, most laughable lies of modern science. How can you claim that some mental capability represents "general intelligence" when the overwhelming majority of those who exhibit it are never able to apply it outside of a few narrow contexts?

>>15685848
Greentards measure temperature by how red they make the background color for the weather report and how many alarms "they" raise.

>>15674512
>Why are more software and engineering companies prioritizing hiring mathematicians and physicists?
Why are the same companies prioritizing hiring women and brown people? Where did people get this idea that corporations do things that make objective sense as opposed to things that management psychopaths get memed into?

>>15258063
If you buy into materialtard dogma, you can believe in anything since you've forfeited any notion of logical consistency and intellectual honesty.

>>15221958
> the New York Times has now turned on the scientists
No, it hasn't. It's simple damage control. The new narrative is going to be (already is, actually) that government bureaucrats were cherrypicking studies and taking them out of context, and now the real scientists are blowing the whistle, so we need more actual scientists in the government to manage the next pandemic (and you will note that these types always talk about the "next" pandemic as a given). Nothing is shifting with establishment mouthpieces. They're just shoehorn any outcome back into the template of their original agenda.

>>15119682
>They can also turn off your electricity with the push of a button or the click of a mouse
Of course. That's one of the things implied by "control". They can do anything from making electricity prohibitively expensive, to selectively cutting your power, to driving your electric clown cart into a concrete wall at 200 mph and saying you killed yourself if you're a whistleblower. Imagine allowing such a thing to happen. Maybe golems deserve this.

>>15093800
Our lord and savior, the sun, dies a little every day for your low-entropy biological sins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kc-d0uT6YJE

>>15085663
AI doesn't exist so I'm not sure what the premise of your thread is all about. How should anyone know what will happen with an unspecified and hypothetical future technology that has been coming in two more weeks for the last 60 years?

>>15064566
>People are literally collapsing in the streets and the hospitals are filled to capacity with sick patients. Morgues and crematoriums can't even keep up the massive number of deaths coming in
It's totally that deadly COVID again, not vaxx depopulation, fucking schizo.

Ship 26 gijinka

>>15047334
>muh AI will replace artists in two more weeks!!
Do AI schizophrenics and human replacement fetishists ever try playing with these toys? It's impossible to get them to comply with a nontrivial prompt and the results are always full of artefacts. I have tried DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion and Midjourney. None of them are usable for anything serious. They can handle generic kindergarten prompts, but as soon as you start trying to nail down specific details the "AI" has no clue what you're asking from it.

>>14853903
Human replacement fantasies are a symptom of mental illness.

>>14840248
>Is it incompatible with science?
Depends on what kind of science you want to do and what kind of god you believe in. You won't do a very good job researching the origins of life if you believe it's the result of divine intervention rather than a natural process, but if you do inorganic chemistry or rocketry or something, such beliefs don't really come into play and you can do that just fine. On the other hand, if you believe in a god that just set the universe in motion and let everything play out without intervention, you could do better science than the atheistic midwits who constantly inject their human ideologies and political views into everything they do, since you'd have more respect for what you're researching (it is all divine creation, after all) and a sense of purpose that lies in uncovering divine truth rather than promoting some mundane sociopolitical cause.

>>14810407
Decent pharma corporations usually have enforce strict segregation between the blood-drinking Jewish vampire teams working on stuff like Rofecoxib or Baycol, and the good, decent normal guy scientists working on safe and effective miracle drugs.

>>14787266
The underlying relationships are directly observable in reality in many different forms. Logic simply abstracts and formalizes them. There's no sense asking for proof. These logical statements are true by definition when they are applicable and they are applicable when a structure in reality is isomorphic to the abstract structure of the logic.

>>14747766
There is no way objective, empirical way to test for consciousness, so there is no objective answer to this. The opinions people spout on it are always just reflections of their own gut feelings, and if your gut feeling tells you that you are essentially the same thing as a program emulating symptoms of consciousness, you deserve to be treated like an object by the rest of humanity.

>>14731538
>realistic scenario
>superintelligent artificial machine
>>>/lgbt/

>>14669945
You can't fix a problem that doesn't exist. You have "low motivation" because you're trying to force yourself to do something you know is absurd, worthless and meaningless in your very core. Modernity is a disease.

>>14636963
I will not eat ze bogs. I will not eat ze poop. I will not eat ze algea. Hopefully the food shortages they're intentionally causing will end up with them and their entire ilk getting brutally tortured and lynched by angry mobs.

>>14545874
>train a mindless machine with the products of a culture you condemn
>the machine predictably emulates its inputs
>condemn the machine
>wait for [controlled opposition that every goylem hates] to show up and embrace the machine as a vindicator of [boogeyman ideology]
>demand the power to "regulate" machine learning, so that it perpetuates the "correct" biases

>>14505484
No takers?

>>14478267
Cool. Now pass laws forcing private companies to open-source all such projects and forbidding them from doing any kind of closed-source AI development.