/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12523997
Something psychological, like a placebo effect, perhaps?

>previously believed race doesn't exist and everyone was equal
>infographs posted here changed my mind
>people who have always believed that race doesn't exist and everyone is equal tell me im just listening to research that supports my opinions

>>11509771
Arbitrarily finite is the measure that can be applied to infinite. It's not that they're not the same and yet permiss the same function. Its that arbitrary finite is the ruler and infinite is the stick. Arbitrary finite is what you can measure and infinite is the thinf you're measuring.
They're not the same cause they're not the same function.

refer back to
>>b: you will count finite numbers forever and never stop
if during this process, someone else asked you what number you were on, you would tell them what number you're on and it would be an arbitrary finite number.
To take a measurement is essential to solving something.
If instead you didn't say which number you were on cause you're intent on "reaching infinity", then whatever value's you're enumerating through will never be useful for anything and your non-response is no better or worse than shrugging or replying with "???".

>how many 3's do we need to calculate on 0.333...?
>"???"
>aight thanks bud

>>11058946
I'm 26 now, and only just started by BSc... although, I'm at ETH Zurich.

if global warming is real why don't we just induce a nuclear winter?

is always replying to questions where one is required to recognize a general pattern, or at least provide an upper and lower bound for the variation, with "it depends, every case is different", the most surefire way to tell if somebody is a brainlet?

>>10627768
Muh sociology teacher said it had to do with a fear-factor or some shit. Said it was easier to call it fake and deny it than admitting to it.

>>10342327
Venus flytraps are hermaphroditic.

>>10331847
Oh, for fucks sake, what is actually wrong with you?
I'm not having this argument, there is absolutely no need. Until you're as impactual as research institution, I don't give a shit what you think, my random 4chan anon.
It's a useful tool, with powerful predictive powers. You're opinion is literally worth piss in comparison.

Okay, so is that it? It arrived on Mars, and no other plans for today?

>>10048500
I'm a fucking postdoc researcher, you salty honky.
The difference between me and you? I didn't do it for the money, I did it for the intellectual challenge.
I grew up getting in fights, flipping rock and nearly get shot at on a daily basis. I wanted something better than that, not in money, I was flush from pushing. I mean, an intellectual change.
In other words, I'm not greedy like you pallid parlor monkeys.

>>10034739
Why would I attempt to validate stupid brainlet shit for dumb niggers.

>>9973801 see >>9973790.
The chart has been thus accurate. And if you were 'joekin fer teh lelz?' Well, get fucked.

>>9969895
Why're you trying to murder someone with wasps/hornets? This seems like a very niché, and possibly inefficient method?

>>9969847
Why does everything with you have to be a contrarian comment, or a snide remark? Is that the "auteurial" aspect of your "Aristotelian autodidactism?"

[math] 0.3 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.33 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.333 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.3333 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.33333 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.333333 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.3333333 < \frac{1}{3} \\ 0.\bar{3} < \frac{1}{3} [/math]
deal w/ it.

>>9878884
Probably with machine learning/AI.

>>9821220
Something you've never attended, or touched.

>>9820023
Yeah, but I did. This disinformation bullshit about IQ needs to stop, it isn't okay to lie to dumb people and tell them they're "capable of anything".
It's cruel.

>>9755469
>And no counter points were made.
Why do I even bother to argue on 4chan? I win within the first 5 minutes anyway.

>>9733647
You don't reach infinity though.

>>9684311
>Bussard Ramjets aren't actually practical. They have to be unfeasible large.
Also the density of interstellar hydrogen is lower than the assumption made back when the concept was first proposed, I know.

>Why don't you calculate what size of rocket you would need to accelerate constantly at 10 G for 35 days?
True, you'd still need a shitload of individual "devices" even if you didn't go with a singular rocket.

>Solar sails produce minuscule amounts of thrust. They won't be accelerating a spacecraft at 1 G.
I didn't mean you complete the whole journey with one.
Conventional rocket into orbit.
Then you would need some form of massive propulsion, perhaps slingshot it around Sol, or a planet and then you activate the solar/magnetic sail.
Although, I'm not sure if that would be enough to maintain C after X amount of light-years.