[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15669999 [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15669999

>>15669628
It will launch on schedule, but the schedule will change multiple times

>> No.15011157 [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011157

>>15010853
It all depends on which schedule you choose.

>> No.14844779 [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14844779

>>14844489

>> No.12576153 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12576153

>>12575552
>and it seemed like the SLS schedule had stabilized around a 2020 launch
>>12575419
>Japan's Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission officially concluded that the rapid decompression was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians after a tailstrike incident during a landing at Osaka Airport in 1978. The rear bulkhead of the plane had been repaired with an improperly installed doubler plate, compromising the plane's airworthiness.
>>12575510
Every SSME has a documented history of which flights it was on. And now they will start ending with "Atlantic Ocean". Fuck SLS.

>> No.12066845 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12066845

>>12066771
>>12066781
That's a funny way to write 3022.

>> No.11821801 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11821801

>>11821180
>implying it will ever launch

>> No.11785635 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11785635

>>11785526
SLS will never launch

>>11785390
No matter what it *will be* someday, New Glenn is still a paper rocket right now and for at least another year.

>> No.11770300 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11770300

>>11770261
>implying SLS will ever launch

>> No.11705463 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11705463

>> No.11320421 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11320421

>>11320314
It needs to be like this one.
Date as the Y-axis? Oh shit Neptunian what you doing? So what even IS the X-axis?
>>11320317
That's like saying F9 should never had launched until each core was reusable ten times or more. That's an old-space attitude.
Fortunately, SpaceX realized that by first launching it as a "normal" rocket, they had plenty of free cores to develop the landing technique, while still running paying missions.
>>11320348
>a thruster not even firing.
That's okay, what's a thruster or a parachute not working, when they're all redundant! (insert unicorn sparkles here) Boing!
But SpaceX? They have to re-run their parachute tests ten times before NASA is satsified!

>> No.11039521 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, 1561498979919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11039521

>>11039500
>What would such a rocket be capable of?
Launching, one would hope. I don't think even a BFR booster would be able to help the top half do that.

>> No.10756256 [View]
File: 20 KB, 600x371, chart.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10756256

You know, if you graph announced SLS launch dates versus age of announcement, the slope indicates that we're less-than-a-year from initial launch.
If you do that for just the last 1000 days, it's only a little more than a year-and-a-half.
So, statistically, they're likely to make it by 2020-2021. They're not having a JWST situation, where the same method will give you an estimate of 2026.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]