/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15086710
It was staged to make the public lose interest in space exploration.

>>9751138
You keep presenting the spinning bucket as if it has any bearing on the earth.
Bucket spinning in a circle with fluid inside=/= A ball rotating on its own axis AND orbiting another object with fluid on the OUTSIDE of the surface. I understand how when you throw in the gravity everything magically seams together but you have to realize that it wouldn't be necessarily if you weren't working with such a broken view of the world. I'm not saying your theory doesn't work in computation, which is all you're proving. It DOES. That's the reason why everyone believes it. The problem is that it doesn't work in the real world.
>>9751139
Stop running, or just ignore the questions don't try and flip it on me. Just answer the question if you can.

>>9751143
The way you calculated the numbers are incorrect, you can do a google search to find your error but here's a couple calculators
http://earthcurvature.com/
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=5&h0=6&unit=imperial
>>9751148
I read the abstract, the experiment doesn't at all prove that mass attracts mass. They're spinning up gold balls and creating a AC current.. And then measuring the average signal of the cantilever's displacement.. Again just a layman. Can you explain how this experiment shows MASS simply attracting MASS on its own effort?