/sci/ - Science & Math

Energy like electrons is the opposite of "matter." Energy as in movement is an expression of time. thats my theory.

>>11237865
The correct reasoning. :^)

OK, I'll actually answer you. Tiny males do not negatively affect reproduction, while at the same time they save resources for the species as a whole. In systems of no effective scarcity for a species, females are almost always larger than males.
Less than 2% of all animal species have male larger dimorphism, because it's overall a significantly less optimized design. Male larger dimorphism tends to only exist in tournament species, where males physically compete for mating rights.

Once direct male on male competition no longer applies for reproduction (which is the case for humans now, and will only become more solidified as we advance in automation) making males large is not effective as it just wastes resources, because males are not more effective at their reproductive role by being larger (whereas females are more effective when they're larger). A male of comparable size to a female is just a waste of resources, he is not any better than a pocket sized male at propagating his genes and continuing his species.

Giantess fetishism is the most high IQ fetish there is, as it is the only fetish that is undeniable and truly optimized given biological reproduction constraints. There is a reason the majority of people don't like it - the vast majority of people are too low IQ to understand it.

A tiny male world like how I described is essentially the final stage of evolution and proof that the human species has reached it's pinnacle biologically form.

>>10538261
Some madlad used excel to discover a unifying model of physics, and he needs our help verifying it with computational power. Evil redditors and academia are after him for his secrets.

>>10490190
>implying clothes matter when girls only look at your brain anyway

Is it possible to conceptually understand any model without learning how to do the math?

>>10385030
Punch her in the fucking mouth and call her a "cunting whore!", as she looks up at you from the floor in horror proceed to stomp her cranium, the class should be hollering, fighting one another, and throwing fecal matter at this point.

R-tards.
Out of 100 couples we expect ~ 50 BG, ~ 25 BB and 25 GG.
If we remove those 25 GG we are left with 25/75 or 1/3.
Clearly would tend to 1/3 with bigger numbers.
Alternatively you just picture the tree.
It's really trivial.

Forgive me, holy Father:

The set of all square primes = \varnothing
The set of all quadrilateral triangles = \varnothing
The set of sets that contain their selves = \varnothing

If any set A that contains itself (A) = \varnothing
then A = \varnothing and A \in A

If A \in A, and A = \varnothing
then \varnothing \in \varnothing

If \varnothing \in \varnothing
then {\varnothing} = {\varnothing , {varnothing}}

If {\varnothing} = 0 = {\varnothing , {varnothing}}
and {\varnothing , {varnothing}} = 1
then 0 = 1

If {\varnothing} = 0 = 1 = \varnothing
and {\varnothing , {varnothing}} = 1
and {\varnothing , {varnothing} . {\varnothing , {varnothing}}} = 2
then 1 = 2

>mfw all numbers are equal

What if i tell you that exist a software that can solve anything, from genetic problems to distribution of eletric towers, would you believe me?

>>10082473
Dont be naive. Economics plays a large role in the debate for energy sources.

>>9955835
Yeah dude, what do we need any sort of arguments about what's possible unless we can actually do it LMAO.

>We don't have the technology to make a car, so why should we ever even consider how it could be possible or work towards it?

>We don't have the technology to go to the moon, so why should we ever even consider how it could be possible or work towards it?

>We don't have the technology to visit other stars, so why should we ever even consider how it could be possible or work towards it?

>We don't have the technology to cure X disease so why should we even consider how it could be possible or work towards it?

>We don't have the technology to completely abandon fossil fuels so why should we even consider how it could be possible or work towards it?

Man I wish more people in history would have your approach. Just stop thinking about all of this and CALCULATE.

>Pluto is not a planet
>Pluto is a dwarf planet
>Dwarf planet is a class of planet
>Pluto is a planet

Prove you're not a brainlet right now

>>9563047
It’s 36

Fuck those IQ improvement (which is impossible) threads.. I mean, memory should actually be improvable, r..right guys?

Methods that may work to start:
>memorising useless stuff just for training
>trying to understand the overall context of stuff more before memorising details (e.g. learn some basic chemistry before learning the periodic table)
>not concentrating on memory itself but improving one's focus (focusing fully plays an important role in remembering stuff) -e.g. regular meditation or something

What do you think are the best ways? Stuff from personal experience is valued most..

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg.2017.104
Scientists are finally figuring out which specific genes code for intelligence. What are the implications of this? Will we be able to genetically determine the intelligence of different populations/individuals? Will we be able to use this to engineer smarter people?

And ended up scoring higher than 95+% of the class; who here /meticulous/

>>9354336
We're reaching levels of retardation that no one thought possible!

>>9328551

Do they have weed out classes in the Humanities and Liberal Arts? I was just thinking about it and it seems like any retard can go all the way in those majors.

>Hiking in the forests of Québec with my uni's outdoors club
>Only 1 other guy and 7 grills
>No one talking to me for half of the hike
>Happen to be majoring in forestry
>Notice a beech with beech bark disease on our trail
>Start explaining to the group what it is and how it occurs
>2 minutes later, the 2 hottest grills come talking to me
>"Wow anon you're so smart, you notice things we're not even aware of. You're a forestry major? You must know so much about nature"
>Both bombarding me with questions for 10 minutes, asking me things about my major, what I study and eventually more personnal stuff about me

Who could've thought this would help me with females

>>9176719
You realize creating another habitable earth-like planet would be literally the most lucrative investment that any human could ever venture to do, right. If there was one man who funded the entire project, he would be a demigod to the patrons of the planet.

>build your own printing press with a shitty car jack
>torrent book
>make your own binding and covers
>spend 50$ on 5000 sheets of copy paper
>roughly 15-35 physical textbooks for less than the price of one

>>9136675
im talking out of my ass here but i intuitively understand the dynamics of complex systems very well. In the atmosphere i imagine boundaries emerging from the interactions of gases exposed to entropy creating pressure gradients, currents keeping the gases mixed. Like upwelling and downwelling. synergy enslaves entropy.