/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10116196
“There’s no evidence for 4d space existing”

*gives purist example*

“Well that doesn’t agree with this wiki sentence which specifically defines 3d space instead of general space”

Low quality bait.

>although modern physicists usually consider it, with time, to be part of a boundless four-dimensional continuum known as spacetime.
>Today, our three-dimensional space is viewed as embedded in a four-dimensional spacetime, called Minkowski space (see special relativity). The idea behind space-time is that time is hyperbolic-orthogonal to each of the three spatial dimensions.

If you embed a space in a higher order space, the geometry still has dimensionality of the higher order space, simple man.

Unironically buy the fucking dip.

Loaded up on Amazon calls Friday morning. Biggest e-commerce company in the world trading $200 off its 50 day moving average following solid earnings, leading into holiday season? You don’t need a fucking formula to figure that shit out man. SPY rally to end the month. You’re welcome for the free money.