/sci/ - Science & Math

Listen up faggots.

Let's say you have a micro economy consisting 1000 hard working farmers and loggers.

Farmers need fertilizer or the land turns arid.

So a Chemical Engineer comes along and designs and invests in a haber plant. Of course he needs support so he hires labourers, technicians, accountants, secretaries and salesman.

Once the plant is up and running the ChemE will be the richest in this micro economy, but he's also employing a lot of people. On top of that all the farmers are making more money and the total wealth of our micro economy increases. Sure you can put someone else in charge of the plant and hope the entire system doesn't break, but the same guy who built the plant is also likely to build something else to benefit the entire economy.

Now we introduce NEETs and other niggers into the economy who also steals shit from everyone. Everyone knows pays social benefits to these niggers. Supposedly the subsidized education helps the NEETniggers, but studies who they perform poorly relatively to the ChemE and accountant's children.


Now can you honestly tell me it would be objectively better for society to remove the MVP (based Chemical Engineer in case you missed it) instead of the NEET niggers? Everyone would lose out if you killed the ChemE, if you killed the NEETscum the only effect would be greater total averages and society would objectively be better.


Prove me wrong.

>>7158278
The title on this one is shilling for universities so hard though. Oh engineering, look at how many billionaires are engineers. Never mind the larger proportion who never graduated; lets talk about engineers.