/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9121598
>Consider e^x over R. Not bijective, but it has an inverse - namely, ln(x).

>>9102412
>I don't know dude. I'm just guessing. You got me there!
So why state the claim as if it's a fact?

>>9097901
>Tai sequence

>>9055570
>Shut up NIGGER
Is the racism really necessary?

>>9050192
>african colonies were a loss of money pal

>>9046512
>Because stupid bitch ass Canadians just estimate 2 lbs per kilo, causing a systematic error.
what

Do you happen to be monolingual? It's really not hard to go back and forth between two ways of thinking about something

>>9039133
> This classical IQ test measures several factors of intelligence, namely logical reasoning, math skills, language abilities, spatial relations skills, knowledge retained and the ability to solve novel problems. (Please note that it doesn't take into consideration emotional intelligence).

>she's a psychometrician who believes in emotional intelligence

>>9038661
>This made me suspect there was some affirmative action involved.
Did you say the same thing when Perelman said
>I'm not a hero of mathematics. I'm not even that successful

>>9038184
>Theres no significant different between the countries in the list outside of poverty and criminality.
>homogeneity

>I also showed that your causation for the difference wasnt true, look at the USA.

>Japanese society is linguistically, ethnically and culturally homogeneous,[234][235] composed of 98.5% ethnic Japanese
>IQ: 105

>America
>the furthest thing from homogeneous
>IQ: 98

>>9024020
>generalizations of Sato-Tate imply analogues of RH for elliptic curves
I only spent 5 seconds googling but I hope I'm missing something, I was expecting something a little more direct based on your posts

>tfw mom believes in acupuncture and "qi wind energy" or some shit

>>9012278
How much does Barry pay you to post this everyday shill?

>>9008724
>indeed

>>9004751
>Except you haven't. Galois recognition as being a great mathematician has nothing to with any prizes he received. More to the point, it favours what I'm saying, what with Galois theory getting the spotlight it deserves only decades after Galois died. You're an affirmative action recipient I imagine.
You're still strawmanning. Galois was unrecognized before his death, so how could the award be redundant?

>It is much, much less likely that good mathematical work will be lost or forgotten because mathematicians will take greater care in preserving it compared to random mediocre stuff. I'm not surprised this point is lost on your dumb nigger brain.
Why the racism? And 'less likely' is not an argument. If the work is not recognized in the first place (say by an award...) that's less incentive for that work to be preserved. Plenty of math has been 'nearly lost', Mohr's theorem was buried for 250 years, and even important work of already recognized mathematicians (i.e. Ramanujan's lost notebook)

>Euler would have published regardless of Frederick the II support.
I'm not going to speculate on alternate timelines.

>No.
I'll wait for an argument that somehow backs up this claim.

>>9003913
>You people are so fucking obnoxious, just because something is a fallacy doesn't mean it's incorrect (I believe that's called argument from fallacy). Address the argument.
You fell into a fallacy precisely because you provided no argument. Do you not know how these work? At least read the wiki page before you post again

>Or you can just go to math exchange and ask. It doesn't test shit. Exams are objectively the superior way of testing your knowledge.
Yes, you could go on math exchange, similarly you can cheat on an exam. I'm not arguing from the point of view of a school administrator trying to minimize cheating, I'm arguing from the point of view of trying to best evaluate a student's knowledge and abilities.

>Much harder than cheating on coursework.
So?

>>8993970
>Yes it has, it's been conducted right now by SETI, it's been conducted over the past 30 years.
see:
>>8993912
> For SERENDIP and most other SETI projects to detect a signal from an extraterrestrial civilization, the civilization would have to be beaming a powerful signal directly at us. It also means that Earth civilization will only be detectable within a distance of 100 light-years.[95]
>100 light-years

You realize the distinction between 'life outside Earth' and 'life within 100 light-years of Earth' I hope? Or do you believe the universe is only 100-light years long?