/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9345955
>explaining the errors in methodology

- let's cherrypick studies with low climate sensitivity

- let's cite one paper (Hargreaves et al. 2012, Annan and Hargreaves 2011, van Hateren 2012 ) several times each to pad out space in our figure because there aren't enough studies to back up my number

- let's misquote Andreas Schmittner's transient climate sensitivity from the LGM studies and call it equilibrium climate sensitivity

See this review in 2017 of the latest state of science climate sensitivity estimate from meta study compilation by actual scientist
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3017.pdf..

3 degrees per doubling of CO2 are still the stone cold averages of all studies.

for Patrick Michaels, a 60 years old grown ass man to misrepresent the state of science in sad sad poster hall, a venue designed for undergrads to show their babby research because he couldn't get a talk slot in AGU is really really pathetic

gg EZ denier