/sci/ - Science & Math

For me its this schizo

Another based schizopost on here that makes me want to keep coming back

Brainlet here, is this true?

>>12016996

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>12016996), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, see the pic for an illustration - it will assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11859627
Has nothing to do with flat earth nonsense, it's just simple physics and fluid dynamics. When you use logic, reason and actual real science, you realize rockets only work (definition: propel themselves forward) inside an atmosphere. This means they don't and can't work in space. Any claims of the contrary is a fraud and a lie.

>inb4 you parrot "newtons 3rd law!" like an NPC without giving the physics any thought

That law /isn't/ in dispute here. Appealing to it to "prove" rockets "work in space" shows you don't grasp the fundamental problem here. The 3rd law is 100% correct. When asteroids floating in the vacuum of space crashes into each other, the 3rd law applies. Likewise, the law applies to objects bouncing into each other on Earth. The 3rd law is 100% real, but it doesn't "do" anything for a rocket when its engine is fired in the vacuum of space. No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

You see, the atmosphere gets thinner at higher elevation until it disappears completely (out in space). That's the issue here. And you can't get around that issue. Parroting "newtons's 3rd law!" doesn't magically make the issue go away. That's just you avoiding to deal with reality.

If you're currently under the "rockets work in space! xd!" spell they cast on you through the entertainment industry and educational system (the indoctrination system), and you want to break free from that spell and shatter the illusion - then see these two educational videos (they play inside your browser):

1st vid: https://files.catbox.moe/dl9ldw.webm
2nd (also important): https://files.catbox.moe/so2rrt.mp4

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted may help you:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4
https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

You can also view pic related for even further assistance in gaining understanding of the physics of rockets.

>>11797335

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11752646), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, see the pic for an illustration - it will assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11776806

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11752646), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11766473

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11752646), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11752646

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11752646), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11747298
No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11747298 ), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

>>11745712

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11745712 ), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

>regarding pic related

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome.

No atmospheric pressure, zero atmospheric density = no thrust. It truly is that simple.

If you don't understand already, then the following videos, in addition to the ones already posted (here >>11730931 ), may help you understand:

https://files.catbox.moe/7e3whr.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/vquxds.mp4

--

For those of you with short attention spans who have difficulty following scientific presentations in video format, here's an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome. You're now ready to take your first steps towards embracing the real world.

>>11689273
And OP, if you have a short attention span and you therefore have difficulty following a scientific presentation in video format, here is an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome. You're now ready to take your first steps towards embracing the real world.

>>11689170
And OP, if you have a short attention span and you therefore have difficulty following a scientific presentation in video format, here is an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome. You're now ready to take your first steps towards embracing the real world.

>>11688876
And OP, if you have a short attention span and you therefore have difficulty following a scientific presentation in video format, here is an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space. You're welcome. You're now ready to take your first steps towards embracing the real world.

>>11669293
For those of you with short attention spans and have difficulty following a scientific presentation in video format, here is an illustration which can assist you in understanding that rockets indeed do not work in space.

>>11593626
See this picture, fren. It might help you.

>>11590116
See this picture, fren. It might help you.

Guys, regarding this >>11580107

For those of you who have difficulty reading and who arrive at totally strange conclusions (after reading that and similar posts) like this anon: >>11580153 and this anon here: >>11580165 (anons who seem to not have understood at all what they read),

I made this picture just for you, so you can see it all clearly instead of trying to comprehend through reading.