/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11069235
>pointing out certain observations that upset the feelings of other humans means you have a low IQ
But I didn't say that.
It's the inability to be intellectually honest and to reason cogently that means you have a low IQ.

And those are two things that conservatives and especially racists certainly have proven to be bad at. So it's not a surprise that they score lower on average on IQ tests.
Here are two other observations you might find interesting: academics score well above average on IQ tests, and academia is overwhelmingly liberal.

>>10941339
>Feminazism and LGBTQXYZ is as far from facts and logic as you can get
No one said you had to agree with 100% of what others conclude. That's the point. Make your own decision. You can learn to reason inside the other side's framework while still maintaining your own point of view if you're not a low IQ simp.
And only brainlets view changing their minds as being "corrupted" and think merely being exposed to opposing ideas is like being infected by a disease.

>In mine there's even deliberate Marxist propaganda
And in mine, my macroeconomics professor told us that global warming was a Chinese plot to undermine capitalism, and that filthy diseased Mexicans were pouring across the border to kill us. And that was back in 2012, before they were memes.
The more you learn about the other side's argument, the more precisely you can understand its differences from your own and the less you have to rely on objections like "but Marx said something like that once"

>>10931687
This.

>>10931565
>7,384 liberals, 1,267 conservatives, and 1,070 libertarians
hmmm