/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12161867

I am a curvature denier, and I fully support the thesis that because space is empty then it can't have any structure.

If light (((bends))) then clearly it implies that you are wrong. Light can't bend. Because if it follows geodesics, then geodesics are always straight, because curvature doesn't real.

Therefore I conclude that (((Jews!!!!))) cooked it up and astronomy is all a huge conspiracy. Nothing is curved, not even the Earth. Coperinicus was just eating too much 15th century (((onions))).

So I conclude that science is all wrong, global warming is false, vaccines are bad, and Trump should be reelected for sure. Kek wills it all.

>>10828613
>clamped, vaccinated, circumcised, based, redpilled, and (((o n i o n s)))

>>10815622
scientifically speaking, what’s the evolutionary purpose of High-IQ scientists debunking god. also, NSFW off topic clamped 5G jew conspiracy racist pony pic related, onnions

>>10780221
sure, there are plenty of dumb posters, but plenty of the time they are harmless. OTOH the /pol/ trollers here are trying to be edgy and "triger people, kek" and "oh seethe harder" and they have a whole stockpile of memes to use for every possibly political topic. it's beyond just stupid/uneducated (that's fine, some of us like to be "teachers" or "popularizers"), but rather it is an intentional attempt to derail reasonable dialogue. /pol/ trolls practice their ability at screwing with people, ever since the whole gamergate stuff

pic sort of unrelated but not really

>>10506249
>>10506255
KEK u guize r so 2011, le dawkinsfags so last season
>ebin_fedora_maymay.png (2.94 MB)
jesus god best god, that's kewl again guise only chads go to church and bang no-premaritalsex-stacies all day kek 6000 years old fossils are cgi, fuck science kek praise Jesus

>>10505603

>>10463946
i will not allow anyone to post OP’s meme without also posting this versh

>>10460575

[eqn]\boxed{ ~\\\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\mathbb{WARNING} \\\ ~ \\\
~~~~~~~\mathfrak{This \ \ \ meme \ \ \ contains \ \ \ content \\\
~~~~~~~~~~that \ \ \ may \ \ \ trigger \ \ \ autists. \\\ ~ \\\ }
~~~~\mathcal{MATURE \ \ AUDIENCES \ \ ONLY ~~~~~ \\\ }
}[/eqn]

thoughts on this, /sci/?