/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12050922
Drop coords and I'll drop you.

>>11590491
No, Coronaviridae is literally in a different order to Orthomyxoviridae (in which you find influenza viruses). Coronaviridae is in Nidovirales, and Orthomyxoviridae is in Articulavirales. I wish you retards would stop saying:
>Coronavirus is just a bad flu!
No, they aren't even related, you fucking moron. You /pol/tards really need to go home, you've been here since 2015, and you're unwanted pests. You've overstayed your welcome by 5 years now! Go home, you don't know shit about science, in fact, you know less about science than you do about politics, and you're practically illiterate on that.

>>10751074
That's funny, considering they were offering a decent amount of money to disprove it, and yet, no one could. The only arguments were:
>But we cantz do it yets?!
Of course we can't do it yet, just like we couldn't build flying machines, or go into space, but... oh look! We did those things, once we had the technology! It's almost like you have to do research and development or something. :^)
Don't bother replying, I'll just choke you out again.

>>10368326
>*pins against wall*
Listen here, kid, you're going to watch those videos, or you're not going to pos-... Hey, don't look away from me, you piece of shit!
>*jabs in the vagus nerve, you go into syncope*
>*drag you over to the chair*
>*ties you to the chair with clothes, puts a sock in your mouth as a gag*
>*puts on the videos for you, then splashes a bucket of iced water over you to wake you up*]
WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEOS, BEFORE YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT POSTING AGAIN, LITTLE BITCH!

>>10368597
But that doesn't actually work, as they get ignored, slide the bottom and then someone posts another "IQ BRAAAAP" thread and you get slid off into the archive. This kind of advice is what got us in this mess back in 2015:
>Lmao, just ignore it and post good threads. Mod will delete the bad ones!
And now in 2019, we're absolutely fucked. More bad threads than good, and if you mention how 4chan wasn't just only shitposting back in the day, and it wasn't you get:
>Lmao, newfag!
Then, you show them the archives and they go:
>Lmao, boomer!
Just shut up, you fuckhead, people like you are complicit!

>>10366561
Listen here, faggot, you're a useless waste of space with nothing of interest to say. Your perception, and thoughts are as mundane as your IQ.
You don't belong here, and deep down you're aware of this gawning feeling of emptiness.
Now, stare into the abyss and I'll stare back.

>>10352674
A diagnostic criteria for AS/HFA is an average to above-average IQ, my ignorant friend.
You know nothing about ASD, and haven't posted any evidence in refutation only opinion.
That means I've won.
You can struggle, and bitch, but that doesn't diminish the fact that I've just metaphorically shattered your cranium and crushed your windpipe.
You're my bitch. My toy. My plaything. And, as such, are totally insignificant and baseless.
Oh, and that's right, you just got DUNKED and SERVED all in one.

>>10344432
>Muh semantic argument
Fuck off, moron. I crushed your windpipe, and not you're bitching about it, sad.

>>10134556
>>10134564
>>10134571
>>10134610
>>10134611
>>10134630
>>10134824
>>10134827
>>10134836
>>10134930
>>10135054
>>10135059
>>10135062
>>10135096
>>10135261
>>10135270
>>10135271
>>10135272
>>10135275
>>10135280
>>10135282
>>10135285
>>10135286
>>10135293
>>10135296
>>10135360
>>10135883
Because they're still only running clinical tests on mice. As, if any of you frauds actually knew, it takes a massive leap between lab trials, clinical tests on humans and then finally making it into pharma or medical science.
But nah, you lot of pseuds keep denigrating someone trying to move humanity into a new era. That's perfectly shallow of all of you, seeing as most (if not all you) will amount to jackshit.
Gosh, I knew /sci/ was dead by now, but not that it was quite this flooded with morons.

>>10048383
Whoa, nice non-argument.
Fun fact, I would destroy you in an actual fistfight, being a street kid who got educated. Sad.

>>9878813
>He doesn't realise just how fucking massive the Solar System (alone) is, let alone the whole universe.
Fuck off, the only one baby tier here is you.

>>9657692
>It's not an ad hominem, which apparently you can't spell, because I've provided 6 lines of counter-argument and only 1 line of insult.
What is a contraction? Oh dear, your super IQ already failing you?

>I've provided 6 lines of counter-argument and only 1 line of insult.
>Having no defects.
I elucidated (made clear) in my previous argument what the defect was, you're just too slow to notice it.
Although, it isn't that surprising, I was already two posts ahead of you by that point. :'D
>It looks like you're the one whose BTFO.
This is actually part of the argumentum ad hominem (which is actually the full term for *ad hom, *ad hominem - I guess that super IQ still hasn't kicked in.)
I'm guessing when you say:
>not-even-close-to-perfect ingellience
You're clearly subconsciously invoking yourself, that's amusing.
Oh, and that's some hilarious hypocrisy:
>which apparently you can't spell
>ingellience
I think you mean "intelligence"; something you're lacking. :'D
>It's not special.
But it is, as the context of what implies perfection would change with the required task of the AI, however, if it was fully generalizing, then the context/definition wouldn't be special.
But as previous discussed (see: >>9657561) it never will be.
>You've directed all the attention at the insult because you feel like you're losing and think the best strategy is to save face on an anonymous image board.
More hypocrisy, clearly you've never heard about stones and glass houses, have you?
To parrot a 'dear compatriot' of mine:
>you're a lamer who can't defend his stupid talk. ;^)
Now, why don't you pick your teeth up and try again. ;)