/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15840200
>what is the solution of this
Antinatalism.

>>15766110
So you go from a "circle" with area 0 to something with no area at all? Cool. I don't get it.

>>15691994
What's the point of your rulers cultivating and funding a new priest class if the priests won't lie?

>>15687267
>I can just divide x by y to find out the ratio. and multiply y by that ratio.
>divide x by y to find out the ratio. and multiply y by that ratio.
>(x/y)*y
>it was actually pretty easy
Nice science board.

>>15677099
>I fucked a pillow with a belt around it
Funny. I was going to rub it in wrt. to your sad virginity next, but you decided to coalesce two pathetic aspects of your subhuman life into one.

Why isn't there any Olympic style math competition? I'm not talking IMO, that's just autistic puzzles for children. Why isn't there like a math decathlon where contestants have to prove their knowledge of a dozen different branches of math on graduate level? This would expose those who only specialize in one field, and reward the true math polymaths.

What causes pandemics that people thought were caused by viruses if not by viruses?

>>15535021
>I decided to look up one of his favorite buzzwords on the archive and tally up all of the posts in june by hour
>It's literally just one obsessed sperg

>>15278816
>expecting the government to abandon its indoctrination center
>expecting the victims of such indotrination to concede that they've been victimized
Never gonna happen. What's gonna happen instead is that they'll arrest you and take away your children if you try to shield them from this abuse.

Was the sun discovered on invented, /sci/?

>>15250893
>baitcastermaster
>reddit

>>15214924
>But by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic q divides p
>proof: it's trivial

>>15213260
What if his real business strategy was to appeal to intellectually insecure midwits by giving them a "smart" brand to posture with and compensate for their lack of real intellectual accomplishments? :^)

>>15181585
>dummit & foote
Mhh. I don't think so.

>>15172171
How come soience fans lambast people for picking up on patterns intuitively and relying on them when they're unable to provide solid logical or scientific grounds for it, but idolize and applaud researchers who use ANN black boxes to solve otherwise intractable problems?

>>15160130
You:
>private transport and air conditioning bad

Also you:
>no, my masters aren't trying nerf my quality of life

>>15130651
Literally who? If she was relevant, would she have to display her pig body in a bikini and beg for my attention?

>>15110520
>In the past, this event might not have even made the local paper and been a footnote
You mean like a certain "deadly" pandemic?

>>15106136
>I have irrefutable proof that determinism is logically incoherent.
You have plausible proof that determinism doesn't play well with moral prescriptivism, which is a surprise to no one.
>inb4 you accuse me of being a determinitard
I hate them more than you do.

>>15101676
You can use this hiring practice to gauge the actual relevance and importance of a position. Protip: the vast majority of "science" wagies are irrelevant and the vast majority of "research" is garbage.

>>15087821
>it DOES sound more likely than global warming being true
Yes, it really does sound more likely than current century's doomsday prophecy being true this time around.

>You're a qualialess drone

Why is it biologically impossible for a (cis) woman to simultaneously hot and smart?

In other words, why did we evolve to rate low IQ phenotypes more attractive than high IQ phenotypes?

>>14991667
Your pseud trash got deleted and you're mad about it. LOL