/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11878589
>Quantum physics proves that gender is an infinite spectrum, thereby disproving heteronormative physics. Don't believe me?

>Particles
>Gender
>neither has a basis in realty
>yet both are treated as they do have one and are discussed endlessly to no avail

Oh I believe you.

>>11878614
>the left is the party of Science
No

>Science proves
No

>laws of physics
>Laws
>Physical universe
No

>change all the time just like gender does.
>contradicts itself at every turn
Yes

>>11680466
>and here's why you're wrong
Why do people keep forgetting what it means to properly settle a disagreement?

>>11650050
>set a standard of measure for what you believe has no standard of measure
That's been done already, and will continue to be done countless times through history. And for what? To despise intuition?

>All conjecture no math.
So you'd rather do math about conjectures? Cause that's what ERT/SR/QM basically is. Math of that which was never proven to exist.

>If you do math with a model and it matches reality this is a good model
Math has absolutely nothing to do with reality or what takes place in reality. What's measured is what already existed, not the other way around. It does not create, destroy, cause or uncause anything. It quantifies the "thing" being spoken of, which is a fancy way of saying that it describes it in a way that certain people understand. A language basically. It's like saying that you're only allowed to describe something in English or Spanish and that no other language is allowed to make up words for it.

>see he's retarded! Can't even into maths!
Math is used for describing, copying/repetition, equating, limiting, comparing, and standardizing to name a few. Which is very useful when it comes to manipulating and altering the qualities of the real things that actually exist. However, it fails at explaining why or how those things exist in the first place.

>Do some math with your Retarded counter model and see if it matches experiment oh wait you can’t because your theory is just mindless conjecture and you can’t.

Experiment? Oh you mean like a scientific experiment that tests things that empirically exist? Would you care to show me one of these experiments that tested "space" and/or "time"? Oh wait let me guess, I have to "know the math" right? I have to take the time to learn a language because sophisticates don't want to explain it in a way that can be understood by all? "It is" or "it isn't" something to be tested, a yes or no answer basically.

>>11395326
Let's start at the beginning :)
The evidence you have for that is an artist's interpretation of what you are saying.
Can you show me a pic of the real experiment?
Rather than a drawing.

>>11395342
I like your energy.
You understand it's a little difficult for me to condense several hundred years of global scientific history into one 4chan post.

If you devote your time to this. You will look forever and never find what you are looking for.

How about you provide me with a link of the evidence to prove the existence of photons.

I challenge you.
Show me the proof.
Of the thing you are so certain of.

>>11344317
Plenty of people know about it, it's been a controversial debate ever since it's inception, Nikola Tesla said that quantum physicists were just beggars in purple robes whom people mistook for king's.
Einstein wasnt the man you thought he was, he was a dirty old man who was into incest and spousal and child abuse, he published all his work during the media coverup about him because of WW2 because of the political climate surrounding antisemitism, you were not allowed to criticise Einstein or people thought you were a Nazi, so he got away with everything, Einstein was a bad man.

>>11214443
What is your evidence for this though?