/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15157063
>good for him. not sure why you think who i heard it from is even worth your "rofl".
It's to the benefit of the schmuck you posted because some of it's copyrighted lol. How nice of me to point it out before he gets called out by someone notable.

>the info is spreading thats awesome in my book
He wrote a book too.

>im asking what YOU believe.
"Beliefs" are for retarded human beings. Know something for a change.

>all magnetic toxoids have an inertial plane
An incommensurable "bloch" wall. Yes. Do you know what the term "incommensurable" means?

>try to talk normal
Why would you want me to act retarded?

>>14543323
>When OUR GUY (no not Wheel, you know who)
Dude gave the world the formula for a magnetic field for free, what the fuck more can you ask for?

>>12064350
>With the right maffs, you could probably derive the size of the universe with the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields

>>12015277
potential

>>12015601
>apparent zero magnetic/zero electric

>>12015756
>I think this is what youtuber Ken Wheeler means when he says waves aren't actual things
"yes"

>>10874953
basically this is how the "dissidents" operate and this is also true for our host here K.wheeler:

he quotes teslas as a proof to being right but in the interview where that quote came from tesla makes mistakes, exmaple: he tought it was impossible to have nuclear power etc....

tesla never said that there was "free energy" or that there was "radiant free energy" but all the tesla fanboys thinks he did... apparently ALL the tesla fans don't know how to read or haven't even read anything from him (ironically since they love him so much)....

pic related is his claim for the shape of a magnets field "lines" but this is not really what you find in real world behaviour.

and thats the state of the "dissident scientists".

>>10864633
>Waaah he put everything but my stupid rope analogy in his book.

Yeah he also defined magnetism and provided a formula for it. What was Gaede doing? Probably getting free bucks from the FBI to provide disinfo on said analogy.

>>10833297
is not really EU its specifically ken wheelers fans you can inmidiately know who they are because they are so simpleton that they constantly use the same words as the fat fuker

any time you heard this words in EM threads is a ken wheeler fan:

PLOTINUS, CONTRA-SPACE, INCOMMENSURABLE, DIELECTRICITY, INERTIA, ACCELERATION, FORCE-AND-MOTION...

other red flag is they post things like: "what it is not what it does."

this fuckers are so retarded that they uses exactly the same wording as the fat fucker, its pathetic

pic is also related

this fucker claimed an "anti-gravity" device many years ago... of course nothing came out of it.

>>10830675

>>10793367
>Who is this "nobody"?
No one specific. Just like the cause of what you're looking for is "nothing specific".

>Wheeler & Lee understand magnetism perfectly well at the fundamental level, and so can you.

Which is why he (Ken) dubbed it "field incommensurability". He understands it by understanding that it doesn't really exist.

"It is so simple that if you understood it it would be incomprehensible to you" -Ken Wheeler

>We do know what causes magnetism. The perfect fluid only has two abilities, expansion and contraction, and they connect in the simulations. A magnetic is where expansion (positive) flows toward contraction (negative). It's an infinitely cycling non-viscous fluid current.

But that doesn't explain why it does it. You're again describing it.

>>10772873
What is the difference between a magnet and a chunk of material unmagnetized made of the same thing? Obviously nothing quantitative because they have the same quantity. The same mass, the same everything.
One however has a different quality than the other. This is due to the alignment of the atoms that make up the material. This is mistaken as a "force", but it isn't a force at all because nothing has changed. The atoms are all the same individually. The only thing that really occurred is that they all were induced to have "more sameness" if that makes any sense. They are now mutually impelled together rather than opposed to each other chaotically. The self similar parts make a "whole" that work as one and are effected as one and that "whole" is expressed as a "field". "What the whole is" opposed to "what it isn't" (the stuff dissimilar to the coherent material).
And this is the case with any material really. You refine it down enough and they will exhibit different properties. A "crystal" or "aluminum" has a different quality "field" than a magnet. You just notice magnetism more because of the stronger effects of the paramagnetic iron. In super powerful neodymium magnets, a whole host of materials including copper, aluminum as well as ceramics go into making them. Obviously the qualities of those materials alters the quality of a field exhibited by a magnet.

TL;DR: Magnetism is basically subatomic geomancy that can't be reified because it also deals with the absence of the subject matter that is exhibiting magnetism. That absence is referred to as "the bloch wall", "counterspace", "domain wall" and is the disparity that causes "polarity" and the self similar splitting of magnets into other smaller magnets.

>>10772885
Great dude

>>10772928
It's all fun and games until you realize that a bunch of clown makeup wearing rappers posed a legitimate question that nobody really knows the answer to.

>>10679193
>>10679203

Actually it's perfectly logical.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXYYsOTPifE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjTckApcp_E

>>10493467
>Anon, how do you draw diagrams? Even CAD requires fucking hands
Imagine not understanding what "hand-drawn" means lmao. I mean like pic related.

>Use the coils and post results, or stfu
Use the coils to do what? Break the laws of thermodynamics? Cure cancer?

>>10448406
>not that guy but i consume a lot of this shit as a hobby

Me too, I've known of circular Sudoku man for going on 8 years and I know what the Schick is about. I also know that it hasn't amounted to shit which is why I come and ask the question that pin these fuckers to the wall for believing this nonsense.

>the idea is that energy on some quantum or sub-quantum level flows around with the same patterns that you observe on the number circle

Which is absurd because energy is neither numbers nor circles. You move it from where it is to where it isn't and it will only take the path of least resistance because it basically works off pressure mediation.

>this mostly amounts to people spending dozens of hours making stupidly complex electromagnet windings in their garage and rattling a ball bearing around when they hook it up to AC power.

Exactly. Because they could never explain how it's supposed to work from the beginning.

>>10447570
>magical golden ratio in a torus

Someone beat you and Marko to the punch, sorry. He also took the time and bothered to explain a shitload of other things that circular sudoku man will probably never understand.

>>10414087
>200 replies omitted

>>10390866
>You came here with a video, the fact that you failed to make me want to watch more is your problem.
No "I" didn't. I am someone different than OP telling you that there are literally hundreds of videos he's made. He also has an ENTIRE book for FREE on archive.org

>oh well tubefeed it to me like I'm vegetable incapable of looking it up myself.
Not how it works.

>>10390864
Welcome to the internet newfriend. Here there's this thing called a "keyword". They're used in conjunction with a search engine so you can find the "key" things you're looking for.

>>10390908
>objects remain at rest
>even though they never are at rest
>"when motion ceases in the most absolute sense the apple vanishes"
>"his 3 laws are generally accurate, but they re intrinsically extremely inaccurate because when motion ceases the body also ceases to exist"

Not hard to comprehend.

>>10260948
I agree, both this video and the people you mentioned were stupid enough to reify time without naming an actual property that it has.
Lets take a quick recap at what the eye candy non-scientist has to say in this video.

>crystal power (fucking great start)
>coherent atoms in crystals! We JUST discovered this!
>reifying a shadow/projection
>8 Dimensional, this means something for some reason or other...
>Smallest length that can exist (measured it using something else) has properties.
>measurements have properties.
>nobody actually knows the exact value of the speed of light (oops I accidentally all of QM and Special GR and GR)
>approximating a rate of induction and confusing it for a "speed"
>no matter how precise are machines are we'll never measure the exact value
>without a theory or guess
>continues to use math throughout the video despite stating math doesn't explain shit
>GOLDEN RATIO
>NEVER EXPLAINS WHAT THE FUCKING GOLDEN RATIO IS
>Theory of everything uniting everything
>When it's already unified

Good lord I want to punch my computer screen. If this cunt simply read "allegory of the cave" this movie would have never been made. By the way every device on earth is electrical, even the particle accelerators and "Quantum" computers telling them. Really fucking indicative of something.

>>9948702
>>9949054
Nah, we should take this opportunity to throw more wrenches in his clock cogs.

>>9913643
> jogs THEN walks

>>9904509
>nobel prize

I'm pretty sure he would actually take a nobel prize as an insult.

Hey nerds,
Is this shit legit?

From /pol/ thread about ayys.

>>9831352
Go ask this guy

>>9818148
>>9818170

Oh boy here we go again.

>Is there a possible way to use magnets and electricity to create molecules or even if on a large enough scale, of certain elements?

Well given that every fucking thing in the universe is held together by electricity and magnetism, yes it would.

>I was thinking of somehow discharging charged particles through some form of build up, like maybe a taser, and using the magnets to help induce collision to create a molecule of an element I know that's basically how accelerators work but I think pulling them together is cooler than slamming them into each other.

we aren't there yet, but yes this is how "matter" is made. Tangled light/EM via constructive/destructive interference. Now as to "how do magnets work", pic related is the pressure gradients in a magnet. A magnet is nothing other that a coherent dielectric object. What that means is that there is absolutely no difference between the materials in it as opposed to the materials in the ground other that coherency/alignment of said materials. This means that a magnet is purely distinguished by it's qualitative aspects and not quantitative.

>>9804324
This is how a magnet "works".

>>9802332
>>9802333
working wonderfully.