/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12487012
>>12487015
Yeah, if you forget about the energy loss from the miles of cables due to the distance of the solar farm to the city
And the energy leakage from batteries
And the fact that it loses efficiency past 25C
kek
The final price would always be massively more expensive.

>>12487018
That's not the efficiency of the powerplant
That's the efficiency of the nuclear process itself which is universal

Solar energy is just the cucked out version of nuclear energy. Once it reaches 35% (currently at 25%), it's gameover. Reaching further makes it too sensitive for common use and limited to some cold wastelands

>>12341616
Tell me more
Tell me more of how a device that can perfectly mimic the neurons and fool the brain, would totally not be used for drugging the brain into orgasmic sensations, resulting into massive adverse effects

>>12125406
It does not matter
You did not make those augmentations - the government did.
As such
>speak against the government
>they shut down your heart

And no lol
Body purist aren't going to be replaced at all because there is something that is even better than cyborgs and they are a little something called a ROBOT.

It's either you are an actual human or a robot
Cyborgs do not have the same secured system as a human and does not have the same productivity of a robot. It's a failure of a design

>>12125407
That's great if it would only rewrite hereditary disease but where do we draw the line?
People would want to design their children the way they want.
The government don't want any liabilities and would weed out people with bad genes
And of course, they do not want substandard cititzens

>>11795977
The game host wanted you to lose
He did that so you would doubt your decision.

The odds are 50/50
However, it's either you win with a smug against his trickery
Or lose just as any other contestant