/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9345063
Actually, Jim Hansen's models from 1988 were pretty spot on, enough to convince some conservative climate deniers to switch positions to the sane side. For context, deniers like to point to scenario A, which assumed exponential greenhouse emissions, as an example of climate alarmism, however as you can see the other two models fit observed warming trends pretty closely. Scenario C assumed a slowing of greenhouse emissions toward the 2000s, which actually happened, and it fits observations the closest.