[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11271445 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 9 KB, 500x300, 1577628411010.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11271445

What's the evolutionary reason behind this?

>> No.10438739 [View]
File: 9 KB, 500x300, okc_rating_curve1[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10438739

>>10438154
BS. You can't say looks are worth just 20% when women rate 80% of men as BELOW average and don't view them as potential suitors unless they're at least moderately attractive.

Women settle of course, but when you're talking about attraction the evidence says that collectively they're just as shallow as men if not more so. And this makes perfect sense because biologically speaking women should care more about looks than men since reproduction is so costly to them.

https://www.livescience.com/58607-mens-looks-may-matter-more-than-personality.html

>> No.7181230 [View]
File: 9 KB, 500x300, okc_rating_curve1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7181230

How can people consciously choose to do engineering? Who dreams of calculating the composition of shit in pipes? Is working as an engineer an admission of failure at life?

Why would anyone do engineering for the money when all finance / management consulting graduate jobs take students from any major and they pay much more?

Can anybody show me a piece of academic engineering research that couldn't have been done by a physicist?

They need to take this shit out of our universities.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]