/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12715550
>another newfag predicting to be oldfag thread

>>12611830
yeah we can say that Jenson has a definite proof to spearman's correlation and a good proof to spearman's hypothesis (his hypothesis was what Jenson said was confirmed using mcv). there is also the question of weather mcv is a good method, but I didn't really read the full paper, just that using mcv on tests that should not result in Jenson effects did (or something like that).
you wouldn't also happen to be the anon that posted pic related in a thread recently (about a day ago?) that would really be a crazy coincidence.

>>12602896
>he didn't say trump voters are hicks you 0 iq inbred illiterate nigger

Except he did (>>12594718
>>12594776), and then you did. You people claim to be open minded, and you say you support diversity, but you hate white people and the working class. You pretend to care about the working class because it makes you feel like a good person, but as you even say in your post, people who disagree with you are 'illiterate niggers'.

You're not 'open minded' and you're not politically informed, as you would like to think. You are suffering from cognitive bias and your attitudes towards anyone who isn't a corporate democrat/neolib suggest that you lack a theory of mind.

>>12397974
I don't see how OP is pushing anything fringe or pseudoscience. Maybe he does hold those beliefs, but I think he is accurately pointing out that scientific consensus can change.

>>12397974
You are correct, I don't understand your point anon. All of those explanations illustrate examples of the scientific consensus changing. Phlogiston is another good example. So is the aether.

>>12383253
And you are assuming that I am a poltard. Im sure a lot of people in this conversation are poltards, but I am a leftist. I'm a pro free speech and I don't like SJW's but I myself am a leftist and I don't agree with Pol or even the MAGA community. Like I said, I imagine that a lot of the people in this thread are from pol, but I am genuinely a leftist. I'm just not a mainstream/corporate Democrat, but I am on the left. I like stuff like Kyle Kulinski, Rising, and Noam Chomsky.

All I am saying is that it is stupid for SJW types to criticize Whites, but to then simultaneously claim that you can't criticize non-Whites because that is racist and you just don't fully understand the "socioeconomic context" or some shit. If people can criticize socioeconomic circumstances that favor white people, then they should also be able to criticize socioeconomic circumstances that favor non-Whites. If people are allowed to criticize white culture, then people should also be allowed to criticize non-white cultures, including black culture, Jewish culture, etc.

>>12274995
>>12254041
I have also seen low T white liberals like yourself
(1) flip out at a Turkish friend of mine who was also a secular Muslim because he criticized Islam and suggested that it was holding our country back. Once again, this was 'racist' and he had 'internalized islamaphobia' or some stupid shit.
(2) I have seen them talk endlessly about 'tolerance', 'diversity' and 'open mindedness'. At the same time you say that 1/3 of the country (working class republicans) are 'uneducated', racist, inbred, country hicks' who are 'too stupid to vote in their own interests. This makes no sense, and if you were a self-righteous partisan piece of shit, then you would realize that. It can't been in someone's 'nest interest' to vote for some rich corporate Democrat who views you and your entire family as a bunch of 'inbred, cousin-fucking, country hick meth fiends'. It can't be in you own 'best interest' to vote for someone who hates you a thinks of you as an uneducated, working class piece of shit.

You people - and by that I mean woke, anti-free speech, anti-white, corporate leftists - are fucking disgusting, and even as an educated, liberal, non-white, non-Christian, I actually have more in common with a working class white conservative that some low T elitist faggot with a degree in gender studies, like yourself.

>>11870981
Creating another profile is some virgin shit, become a chad and uninstall them desu. But its up to you of course
It normally just depends on class text assigned, but at my university I find myself using Bookshelf and Yuzu for all of them. I think Campbell has their own site for their books, but I can't remember or check what it is since I'm not with my desktop rn.

>>11606685
>>boku no chica
*chika

>11589395
>age
25
>major
PhD student in Geochemistry
>Interests
Outdoor shit, diving, cooking
>IQ
Never took a test, IQ is nonsense
># of friends
5-6 good real friends, many nice people in my cohort
># of sexual partners
12
>age you got into STEM
9 or 10

haha it's extraordinarily difficult for an amateur to synthesize from scratch

What options for a non-degree baka like myself is there to do that engages my brain?

>>10863240
>>10864671
do it faggot

>>10717302
POSTING IN END OF THE WORLD PREDICTION THREAD

>>10685195
The uranium-in-your-water industry.
>>10685202
You must have me confused with someone else. I'm not arguing against 5g, I'm about to put 95% of your jurisdiction's legally allowed uranium into your water and quite possibly into the air as well.

What self-study material should a CS major learn in order to sit for the Putnam competition?

I've taken a decent number of pmath and combinatorics & optimization courses but really am unsure if I have the mathematical maturity for the contest.

I got a headache the other day

It was very annoying

My theory ? Invisible Monsters attack you.

My solution ? DANCE WITH MONSTERS !

Why ?

The invisible monsters need stationary immobile targets, that's the only way they can induce headaches.

You will notice in theory that when you move your head around, bobbing to a beat, or dancing, the occurrence of headaches is greatly minimized, completely eliminated.

In conclusion Invisible Monsters, Ghosts, and Demons try to give human beings headaches, your best bet is to dance with them so you tire them out, and they give up

>>10515461
Yes. This is in fact the basis for the chika dance.

>>10505730
All that proves is that blue-eyed whites are the chosen people and true children of God, which we all knew anyway.

>>10497186
If modern set theory can solve anything at all, it should be able to solve these very simple, basic questions. As it stands, the field concentrates on (a) applying forcing to show more and more of set theory's failures and limitations, and (b) inward-focused navel-gazing not-even-wrong topics such as large cardinals and forcing axioms.
>>10497190
They think they can base all mathematics on sets. That on its own is somewhat reasonable, but then they slip in their own retarded axiom system and rules of inference and everything goes to shit from there.